Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

The Final Records from the SEC's First Big12 Expansion

6,378 Views | 41 Replies | Last: 11 mo ago by dixichkn
Ugly
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:36a, 1/12/24
AG
With the season finally over, we close the lid on this phase of the SEC. The final records of all teams during this time are:

#1. Alabama (89.9%, 151-17)
#2. Georgia (82.2%, 134-29)
#3. LSU (71.4%, 110-44)
#4. Texas A&M (64.2%, 97-54)
#5. Florida (62.3%, 91-55)
#6. Ole Miss (59.1%, 88-61)
#7. Mississippi State (57.5%, 88-65)
#8. Auburn (57.1%, 88-66)
#9. Missouri (57.0%, 86-65)
#10. Tennessee (55.0%, 82-67)
#11. South Carolina (53.3%, 80-70)
#12. Kentucky (50.0%, 75-75)
#13. Arkansas (40.8%, 60-87)
#14. Vanderbilt (37.2%, 54-91)

While Texas A&M did not hit many of its goals during this time, we finished a respectable fourth place. This is impressive enough given the clear dominance of the SEC during this period.

Other notable results are the dominance of the SEC West, with 6 of the 7 teams in the division finishing in the top 8 of the conference, including both Mississippi schools finishing in the top half.

Newcomers OU and tu are not included for obvious reasons, but strictly by numbers OU (78.3%, 123-34) would place between Georgia and LSU and tu (59.2%, 90-62) would be essentially tied with Ole Miss. I will leave it to the wisdom of the zoo how much any of that matters.
Reply Quote
14
hunter2012
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:51a, 1/12/24
AG
We're the highest place record for a team with no conference or national championships.
Reply Quote
28
CCAD AG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:52a, 1/12/24
Now do conference games only.
Reply Quote
50
StinkyPinky
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CCAD AG • 10:55a, 1/12/24
AG
CCAD AG said:
Now do conference games only.


This. The data can by skewed based on strength of mon-conference schedule. Would be interesting to see impact (perhaps none, but would be an appropriate view).
Reply Quote
3
The Lost
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:00a, 1/12/24
Consistently avg pays off for something like this, and having just 2 head coaches compared to others on this list.

Really good at going 4-4, with just Johnny's year, covid year and 22 as good seasons.

I have a feeling many here would trade with uf/mizzou, who had a few awful years, but also made the conference title games.

Reply Quote
2
Ugly
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to StinkyPinky • 11:17a, 1/12/24
AG
StinkyPinky said:
CCAD AG said:
Now do conference games only.


This. The data can by skewed based on strength of mon-conference schedule. Would be interesting to see impact (perhaps none, but would be an appropriate view).
Honestly, not much changed other than East teams (see Florida, Missouri, and South Carolina) getting more credit for their relatively weaker schedules when you take out non-cons:

#1. Alabama (89.8%, 88-10)
#2. Georgia (81.4%, 79-18)
#3. LSU (65.3%, 64-34)
#4. Florida (58.2%, 57-41)
#5. Texas A&M (53.6%, 52-45)
#T-6. Auburn (48.0%, 47-51)
#T-6. Missouri (48.0%, 47-51)
#8. Ole Miss (46.4%, 45-52)
#T-9. Mississippi State (43.9%, 43-55)
#T-9. South Carolina (43.9%, 43-55)
#11. Tennessee (39.8%, 39-59)
#12. Kentucky (35.7%, 35-63)
#13. Arkansas (24.5%, 24-74)
#14. Vanderbilt (21.6%, 21-76)
Reply Quote
17
2 edits
CCAD AG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:28a, 1/12/24
Thanks. We fared better than I expected.
Reply Quote
21
TexasLeaguer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:28a, 1/12/24
AG
Thanks for doing this! Pretty interesting. I honestly assumed that we would be closer to 6-7 rather than 4-5.
Reply Quote
4
Emilio Fantastico
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:45a, 1/12/24
AG
Arkansas was by far and away the most negatively impacted by SEC expansion.
Well, expansion and a motorcycle accident.
Reply Quote
3
W
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:52a, 1/12/24
AG
interesting data

A&M's dominance over Arkansas (11-1) and South Carolina (9-1) really skews the conference record
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
Guy12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to W • 12:02p, 1/12/24
W said:
interesting data

A&M's dominance over Arkansas (11-1) and South Carolina (9-1) really skews the conference record


Are you saying we skewed our conference record by beating conference teams? You know, the entire West plays Arkansas every year and the entire East plays both South Carolina and Vanderbilt. It sounds like you're looking for a reason to be negative.
Reply Quote
30
GrapevineAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:17p, 1/12/24
AG
53.6% in conference stinks. Wonder what our record was against teams from Mississippi - not good enough for sure.
Reply Quote
2
A. G. Pennypacker
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:20p, 1/12/24
AG
For being 4th on that list it sure seems like we got punked quite often by the 6th and 7th place teams.
Reply Quote
9
2 edits
Fanatic15...Drs2B!
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:20p, 1/12/24
This is excellent information and paints a clearer and better picture than many of the pot bangers would admit to.

Yes. Not what we were and are looking to achieve since we joined the SEC - but does put things in perspective relative to the other teams in the conference.

Would actually be interested in seeing the same data from the SEC (including overall and conference records) from the same number of years leading up to and ending with the first year of Nick Satan's tenure at Alabama - which obviously would NOT include the Ags.

THEN during the exact same period listed for that second SEC analysis - get the same thing for the Big 12 (which WOULD inlcude Texas A&M).

Finally would like the same time chunks for the same number of years for both SEC and Big12 (might go back into SWC) for the years PRECEDING that second time period analysis.

I like this kind of data - but I'm too lazy to out it together myself (and I have a day job).

Hopefully some retiree or independently wealthy poster (on the Zoo? - yeah. Right) with time on their hands can put this together for me.

Thanks in advance!
Reply Quote
2 edits
A. G. Pennypacker
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:41p, 1/12/24
AG
Would also be interesting to see our head-to-head against each SEC team since joining.
Reply Quote
ColtAg21
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:47p, 1/12/24
This really brings me little consolation. we couldn't even win the damn SEC west once!
Reply Quote
3
Emilio Fantastico
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GrapevineAg • 1:33p, 1/12/24
AG
GrapevineAg said:
53.6% in conference stinks. Wonder what our record was against teams from Mississippi - not good enough for sure.
That alone was what really kept us from being a Tier 1 team in the SEC.

We rarely, if ever swept both. So if you added just 1 win a year by beating 1 or both of them each year. the numbers would look so much better.

Taking away 12 losses and adding 12 wins by dominating the Mississippi schools would put us at 64-33 and percentage points ahead of LSU for 3rd.

In all honesty, the record against the Mississippi schools was really both Sumlin's and Jimbo's undoing.
Reply Quote
6
Onionman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:41p, 1/12/24
I've pointed to the records every time 90% of people on here say Missouri had more success than A&M in the SEC.

Not only is A&M's overall and conference record better. They played in the tougher SEC division!
Reply Quote
3
Fins Up!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Emilio Fantastico • 1:41p, 1/12/24
AG
Emilio Fantastico said:
Arkansas was by far and away the most negatively impacted by SEC expansion.
Well, expansion and a motorcycle accident.


Arkansas was most negatively affected by a moped crash.
Reply Quote
1
Onionman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Fins Up! • 1:49p, 1/12/24
The Chicken Ranch said:
Emilio Fantastico said:
Arkansas was by far and away the most negatively impacted by SEC expansion.
Well, expansion and a motorcycle accident.


Arkansas was most negatively affected by a moped crash.
I read your response too quickly...




Reply Quote
2
EliteZags
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CCAD AG • 3:00p, 1/12/24
AG
CCAD AG said:
Now do conference games only.


Do you and your buddies usually compare flaccid?
Reply Quote
AGinHI
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:11p, 1/12/24
AG
Reply Quote
9
EliteZags
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGinHI • 3:14p, 1/12/24
AG
fans should be storming field
Reply Quote
TexasRebel
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGinHI • 3:22p, 1/12/24
AG
AGinHI said:


Gotta learn to spell before you can pass the Turing Test.
Reply Quote
1
Bluecat_Aggie94
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AGinHI • 3:27p, 1/12/24
AG
Did AI do that? If so, AI needs to work on teeth.
Reply Quote
TexasRebel
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bluecat_Aggie94 • 3:34p, 1/12/24
AG
Bluecat_Aggie94 said:
Did AI do that? If so, AI needs to work on teeth.


And gig'ems.
Reply Quote
1
ashley
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:44p, 1/12/24
I guess we get a ribbon.
Reply Quote
1
The Lost
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Onionman • 4:35p, 1/12/24
Onionman said:
I've pointed to the records every time 90% of people on here say Missouri had more success than A&M in the SEC.

Not only is A&M's overall and conference record better. They played in the tougher SEC division!
People like trophies and they have more division ones. They have just been awful instead of mediocre in their bad years. We each have 2 top 10 seasons, and a 2-2 recorded vs each other. Each have a ny6 and pre those cotton bowl wins.
Reply Quote
1 edit
W
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to A. G. Pennypacker • 4:39p, 1/12/24
AG
aglaes said:
For being 4th on that list it sure seems like we got punked quite often by the 6th and 7th place teams.
yes, going a step further...

I believe A&M is a staggering 26-3 against the bottom 5 teams on the list (Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, and Vandy)

which means the Ags are 26-42 vs. the top 9 teams (excluding A&M of course)
Reply Quote
2
Fanatic15...Drs2B!
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to W • 4:46p, 1/12/24
W said:
aglaes said:
For being 4th on that list it sure seems like we got punked quite often by the 6th and 7th place teams.
yes, going a step further...

I believe A&M is a staggering 26-3 against the bottom 5 teams on the list (Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Arkansas, and Vandy)

which means the Ags are 26-42 vs. the top 9 teams (excluding A&M of course)


Awesome! So we OWN the bottom third of conference.

NOW let's own that middle third as well (while maintaining dominance against the bottom third).

THEN at least break 50-50 OR BETTER against the top third (which, for now, i will call Georgia, Bama, LSU, tu and a rotating number 5 - not including us - like Oklahoma, Ol Miss, Mizzou, Florida or Tennessee - depending on the year) - which should mean 10+ win seasons going forward - and competing for a spot in the CFB playoffs every year!
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
87_Was_Long_Ago
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:55p, 1/12/24
AG
quite frankly, it's amazing we finished 5th with an all caucasian team with 17 kickers...
Reply Quote
4
EliteZags
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 87_Was_Long_Ago • 5:58p, 1/12/24
AG
Reply Quote
TexasLeaguer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to W • 7:17p, 1/12/24
AG
W said:
interesting data

A&M's dominance over Arkansas (11-1) and South Carolina (9-1) really skews the conference record


Playing Bama every year really skews the record, too.
Reply Quote
3
94chem
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bluecat_Aggie94 • 7:24p, 1/12/24
Bluecat_Aggie94 said:
Did AI do that? If so, AI needs to work on teeth.


Adolph Rupp would like AI.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Reply Quote
1
TexasRebel
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TexasLeaguer • 8:38p, 1/12/24
AG
TexasLeaguer said:
W said:
interesting data

A&M's dominance over Arkansas (11-1) and South Carolina (9-1) really skews the conference record


Playing Bama every year really skews the record, too.


Uh. We beat them more than most.
Reply Quote
1
Page 1 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.