ElephantRider said:
Does anyone else ever get the feeling that Pate has literally no clue what he's talking about?
If you think about the overlap b/w the set of coaches he hinted would be in play (unexpectedly) with the caliber of coach we're requiring now, I figure it must mean either:
- just a few P5 HCs: M Stoops, Wilingham, Rhule, Fleck? (anyone else?),
- an absolute slam-dunk OC or DC from someplace where the HC is not on the table (tOSU, UGA, Bama, PSU?), or
- an NFL HC
So in material terms it's only informative IMO if it's one of the P5 HCs above. Which would add support to your point, ElephantRider
What I did like about it is that it -- specifically the 0u->USCw Riley analogy -- likely head-faked a lot of out-of-region cheesed**k listeners into finally grasping that the A&M position would be no less of a draw than any other imaginable CFB HC opening.