fightintxaggie10 said:
I forgot about UT getting told no by several people but now I remember that whole thing.
My question is, other than following the Dan Lanning 2.0 logic, which never works, why is Glenn Schumann expected to be able to run an entire program from hiring and managing assistants and position coaches, to managing NIL, and all that? I'm just curious why Dan Lanning was given the job at Oregon, when both he and Schumann were in the same position, Co-DC, at Georgia?
Lanning is about 5 years older and was calling plays at the time. That's probably why he got picked.
He hasn't been given his chance yet because of his age. One thing to keep in mind is that he started assisting on Saban's staff when he was in undergrad, as opposed to playing until he was 22 and then getting a GA job.
I listed the reasons I think he'll be successful in my OP, but once again, he has trained for the last 15 years(way longer than most) under the 2 best coaches in modern college football. They think extremely highly of him, and trust him with a ton of responsibility, in spite of his young age. Kirby says he relies on Schumann for a lot of important "HC" tasks, like recruiting and practice scheduling. He is one of the best statistical recruiters in the history of Football, already being credited with 12 5*s and countless 4*s.
I'd encourage you to listen to an interview where Kirby talks about Schumann. He raves about him more than Kirby or Saban have ever raved about an assistant. His players do the same. From a resume perspective, his is better than most first-time head coaches.
I don't think he's Lanning 2.0. I think there's a 1/3 chance he's Kirby 2.0. He has a lower floor than other guys we are talking about, but a way higher ceiling.