If that happens, it would mean that the Big 10, Big 12, ACC and SEC would have schools in Florida.Logos Stick said:
I heard from a reliable source the FSU is going to the big 10. In fact, the announcement is imminent.
If that happens, it would mean that the Big 10, Big 12, ACC and SEC would have schools in Florida.Logos Stick said:
I heard from a reliable source the FSU is going to the big 10. In fact, the announcement is imminent.
McInnis80 said:If that happens, it would mean that the Big 10, Big 12, ACC and SEC would have schools in Florida.Logos Stick said:
I heard from a reliable source the FSU is going to the big 10. In fact, the announcement is imminent.
agnerd said:Was this the one regent that voted against allowing t.u. in? If it wasn't, you should have asked why the regent voted in favor. Don't forget, our leadership voted 8-1 to allow t.u. in!!! We should be mad at our regents more than Sankey for allowing this to happen AND SUPPORTING the decision with their vote. If SC wants Clemson out of the conference and their leadership will vote against allowing Clemson in, they should get a lot more consideration on the decision than what we got. Don't forget: WE VOTED FOR t.u. TO JOIN OUR CONFERENCE!!!Bryanisbest said:
Snakey hid their admittance from the powers that be at Texas A&M. I was told this directly by an A&M Board of Regents member at the time.
Definitely Not A Cop said:McInnis80 said:If that happens, it would mean that the Big 10, Big 12, ACC and SEC would have schools in Florida.Logos Stick said:
I heard from a reliable source the FSU is going to the big 10. In fact, the announcement is imminent.
Actually not that surprising based on the recruiting potential and demographic shifts.
What's more surprising is that the BIG10 isn't trying to do the same to Texas. SEC big12 and ACC are already here.
They were all charter members; they got together and formed the conference.Bryanisbest said:Ag Tag said:
Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee and Vanderbilt don't seem to have any problems with two schools from each state being members of the conference?
All they got in before the agreement if there was an agreement.
Agree to disagree. If we knew we were going to lose the vote, that's even more of a reason to vote against t.u. It wouldn't change the outcome, but it would register our disagreement with how t.u. has treated other members of its conference and that it would hurt A&M athletics. It also warns others that the school with the most history with t.u. has some concerns. If we don't have the balls to do something different than everyone else, we're nothing more than nutless bovines, and we deserve to have other people making decisions for us. Have some principles, stand up for them, and be confident in your beliefs until someone can provide a better opinion or enough evidence for you to change your mind. Sometimes that means having to do something that isn't popular and isn't supported by others. Until then, we are just hypocrites and our opinion doesn't matter.Aginnebraska said:
How our regents voted didn't matter. Regents were voting for how our single SEC representative at would vote. Given the mood of other SEC members on the tu/OU admittance, it was already a 'done deal'. By BoR voting in favor, it simply made A&M look more gracious (like it was our choice) instead of powerless (which was the real situation).
Good. I hope so. We had no say so, no one else should eitherDone7 said:
Clemson and FSU are pretty much a done deal. It's just a matter of when not if.
You cannot rely on any school in the SEC!JJxvi said:
The problem with the gentleman's agreement, is that probably only 5 schools really care. Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, Kentucky, and us. Is Arkansas, LSU, or Missouri scared of anybody actually getting invited from their state? Doubtful. So you got 5 votes out of 14 you could rely on, what good is it?
If so, it means they found a way around the grant-of-rights issue. If that's the case, the ACC becomes Pac12 2.0 as they get picked apart.Done7 said:
Clemson and FSU are pretty much a done deal. It's just a matter of when not if.
merch said:
Not this again. We voted yes to TU. We cannot complain.
agnerd said:Agree to disagree. If we knew we were going to lose the vote, that's even more of a reason to vote against t.u. It wouldn't change the outcome, but it would register our disagreement with how t.u. has treated other members of its conference and that it would hurt A&M athletics. It also warns others that the school with the most history with t.u. has some concerns. If we don't have the balls to do something different than everyone else, we're nothing more than nutless bovines, and we deserve to have other people making decisions for us. Have some principles, stand up for them, and be confident in your beliefs until someone can provide a better opinion or enough evidence for you to change your mind. Sometimes that means having to do something that isn't popular and isn't supported by others. Until then, we are just hypocrites and our opinion doesn't matter.Aginnebraska said:
How our regents voted didn't matter. Regents were voting for how our single SEC representative at would vote. Given the mood of other SEC members on the tu/OU admittance, it was already a 'done deal'. By BoR voting in favor, it simply made A&M look more gracious (like it was our choice) instead of powerless (which was the real situation).
Ag Tag said:They were all charter members; they got together and formed the conference.Bryanisbest said:Ag Tag said:
Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee and Vanderbilt don't seem to have any problems with two schools from each state being members of the conference?
Yes !
All they got in before the agreement if there was an agreement.
BSCE84ag said:
Ate lunch with a friend of mine. tu grad. Polite banter about current season. good luck, you are up finally, big ku game... no matter if you were a no show in the little 12 for the past decade' Him, ku is a ranked team and we gotta take them seriously. Me, ? really?
Then, "Well, wouldn't it be funny if tu wins SEC champ before Ags entered it years ago ..." I just wanted to vomit lunch. I told him I didn't miss the arrogance and harassment for the last 10 years. And here we go again. ( I still dont know why they think they are superior to everyone.)
Ended okay, I just told him it isn't the same in the SEC as Big dumpster fire. All teams are a challenge every week. You learn a new hate for other teams, not just one or two. Welcome to the SEC, but dont think you will just take over.
agnerd said:Agree to disagree. If we knew we were going to lose the vote, that's even more of a reason to vote against t.u. It wouldn't change the outcome, but it would register our disagreement with how t.u. has treated other members of its conference and that it would hurt A&M athletics. It also warns others that the school with the most history with t.u. has some concerns. If we don't have the balls to do something different than everyone else, we're nothing more than nutless bovines, and we deserve to have other people making decisions for us. Have some principles, stand up for them, and be confident in your beliefs until someone can provide a better opinion or enough evidence for you to change your mind. Sometimes that means having to do something that isn't popular and isn't supported by others. Until then, we are just hypocrites and our opinion doesn't matter.Aginnebraska said:
How our regents voted didn't matter. Regents were voting for how our single SEC representative at would vote. Given the mood of other SEC members on the tu/OU admittance, it was already a 'done deal'. By BoR voting in favor, it simply made A&M look more gracious (like it was our choice) instead of powerless (which was the real situation).
Logos Stick said:
I heard from a reliable source the FSU is going to the big 10. In fact, the announcement is imminent.
It's all about the green. That and the BIG wants to tap into the SE for recruiting. Similar to having bases in the West.Stone44 said:Logos Stick said:
I heard from a reliable source the FSU is going to the big 10. In fact, the announcement is imminent.
No way, they don't meet the academic standards of the Big 10.