When and what was Panhandle Slim's last post?
Ghost of Bisbee said:
Panhandle Slim must be Rojo.
I bet Ben There/R.C. knows Rojo
Of course you know the Starks, RC. I have a picture of you with Homer and his grandson, (PHS) probably taken about the time he was a GA under Tim Cassidy. Perhaps you don't really know PHS's identity. Otherwise, I haven't a clue about your position/motivation.Ben There said:
Still not correct Boerne gator. I know all about the Stark family. Homer Stark (Lutcher's son) '41 brought me to A&M when I was a kid. I once met Panhandle Slim and he is not connected to the Starks in any way. His initials are B.R.
IIIHorn said:Ghost of Bisbee said:
Panhandle Slim must be Rojo.
I bet Ben There/R.C. knows Rojo
No, Sir.
He is not Rojo
BoerneGator said:Of course you know the Starks, RC. I have a picture of you with Homer and his grandson, (PHS) probably taken about the time he was a GA under Tim Cassidy. Perhaps you don't really know PHS's identity. Otherwise, I haven't a clue about your position/motivation.Ben There said:
Still not correct Boerne gator. I know all about the Stark family. Homer Stark (Lutcher's son) '41 brought me to A&M when I was a kid. I once met Panhandle Slim and he is not connected to the Starks in any way. His initials are B.R.
Perhaps you can shed some light on why Slim "disappeared" about ten years ago when he did? He was very active up until the time his identity became known.
I think RC's point is that it would make posting on these forums less vitriolic if we used our real names. Regards, Mark PustkaCowDog said:
I thought I'd seen the last thread on TexAgs where BeorneGator and cecil77 would post. And others here too that remind me of better days. (Read that as YOUNGER days, I guess)
As for anonymous posting, I respectfully disagree with Coach. I think the Founding Fathers understood the need for and importance of anonymous speech.
I submit the this link in case anyone might be interested in reading about anonymous speech. It mentions 'Publius" the pseudonym of several Founding Fathers who wrote the Federalist Papers.
Yes. On the modern internet with its "social" media, anonymous speech is abused and I don't support or condone most of that sort of thing. But I wouldn't throw out the baby with the bathwater on anonymous speech either.
Anyway. Be well, y'all.
85AustinAg said:I think RC's point is that it would make posting on these forums less vitriolic if we used our real names. Regards, Mark PustkaCowDog said:
I thought I'd seen the last thread on TexAgs where BeorneGator and cecil77 would post. And others here too that remind me of better days. (Read that as YOUNGER days, I guess)
As for anonymous posting, I respectfully disagree with Coach. I think the Founding Fathers understood the need for and importance of anonymous speech.
I submit the this link in case anyone might be interested in reading about anonymous speech. It mentions 'Publius" the pseudonym of several Founding Fathers who wrote the Federalist Papers.
Yes. On the modern internet with its "social" media, anonymous speech is abused and I don't support or condone most of that sort of thing. But I wouldn't throw out the baby with the bathwater on anonymous speech either.
Anyway. Be well, y'all.
Facebook has proven that people are vicious on the internet even with their real names.85AustinAg said:I think RC's point is that it would make posting on these forums less vitriolic if we used our real names. Regards, Mark PustkaCowDog said:
I thought I'd seen the last thread on TexAgs where BeorneGator and cecil77 would post. And others here too that remind me of better days. (Read that as YOUNGER days, I guess)
As for anonymous posting, I respectfully disagree with Coach. I think the Founding Fathers understood the need for and importance of anonymous speech.
I submit the this link in case anyone might be interested in reading about anonymous speech. It mentions 'Publius" the pseudonym of several Founding Fathers who wrote the Federalist Papers.
Yes. On the modern internet with its "social" media, anonymous speech is abused and I don't support or condone most of that sort of thing. But I wouldn't throw out the baby with the bathwater on anonymous speech either.
Anyway. Be well, y'all.
Hehateme1 said:Yep, except for PHS part. He did carry water for RC. RC did post here from time to time. Man, Solari... I loved that dude. Hadn't thought of him in a while. Gone too soon.VatoLocoAggie said:Hehateme1 said:
I thought RC was Ben There or something like that
As I recall …
Ranger65 is Gates
PanhandleSlim is RC
JFF is Johnnny Manziel
Solari94 is Solari
Etc …. There are a few others who were posting inburrito but yeah.
Ken Scarborough said:
Facebook has proven that people are vicious on the internet even with their real names.
I think some people are going to be jackwagons, anonymous or not.JBGoode said:Ken Scarborough said:
Facebook has proven that people are vicious on the internet even with their real names.
Sure, but those are jackwagons in real life as well.
Anonymity brings out the worst in normally good people. Sad but true.
BoerneGator said:
Typical response from the peanut gallery. Per usual, you contribute absolutely nothing to the discussion (save your own uninformed bias). You're like those rubber-neckers, gawking at the scene of the wreck, wondering what just happened, but clueless all the same. And you've known my identity since before all this went down, huh?
I starred your post, Pat. Your best, perhaps forever… keep it up!Potcake said:
nm, not worth it