"(((Soros'))) socialist playground"

You forgot these

Pony or kangaroo?

92Ag95 said:

---

WC94 said:

---

Just saw their woke commercial promoting/celebrating competing as a trans woman. One of the most idiotic agendas ever and if left to fester, will ruin womans sports.

Contract is up this June, time to shop around Bjork. How about a brand that just focuses on athletic apparel and not virtue signaling?

---

They're all jumping into the bs game for fear of being ostracized

---

That's what this whole "jump on the woke bandwagon" crap is......a bunch of kids on the playground daring each other to eat dog sh.t.....and you can bet little Timmy is gonna eat it because he doesn't want to be bullied.

Go with Neon Apostle.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/announcing-the-worlds-first-christian-shoe-brand-300496520.html#:~:text=SINGAPORE%2C%20Aug.%201%2C%202017%20%2FPRNewswire%2F%20--%20Launching%20today%2C,of%20cutting%20edge%20graphics%20and%20traditional%20Christian%20motifs.

S.A. Aggie said:

---

Go with Neon Apostle.

---

Well…that's about the worst thing I've ever seen.

Some of you guys with your suggestions of companies that don't even make a football/turf shoe make me laugh.

WC94 said:

---

PacifistAg said:

---

WC94 said:

---

PacifistAg said:

---

Thank you for sharing. Way to go, Adidas!

Oh, and stop pretending that you actually care about women's sports. The ones I see trot out that line also tend to be the ones who mock women's sports the most.

---

Username checks out.

I have a daughter and it would be nice if she grew up not having to compete with guys who want to be girls. I have no problem with if you want to change your gender, just don't normailze it so much you think you have a right to play womans sports.

If so, in time, almost every female olympic record will be replaced by a trans woman.

---

What does being a pacifist have to do with anything? What an absolutely pathetic deflection.

And as a trans woman, I'll absolutely support trans athletes. As does my wife and daughter. But you're free to disagree. And you're free to continue with your tantrum over a commercial.

---

Because pacifists have no balls..

---

Lol right.

Grunt Style

West Point Aggie said:

---

Of all the **** in the world to worry about…

---

It's actually kind of important unless you want your dollars spent on promoting men competing in women's sports.

Strike a deal with Wrangler. Denim pants and western yokes on the jerseys.

I have a solution that should please everyone.....woke, not woke, gay, straight, republican, democrat, male, female, 253 other genders......

Stick with Adidas, but identify as Puma.

alamogeorge said:

---

West Point Aggie said:

---

Of all the **** in the world to worry about…

---

It's actually kind of important unless you want your dollars spent on promoting men competing in women's sports.

---

Good thing that's not what's happening.

STARTER

Sapper Redux said:

---

alamogeorge said:

---

West Point Aggie said:

---

Of all the **** in the world to worry about…

---

It's actually kind of important unless you want your dollars spent on promoting men competing in women's sports.

---

Good thing that's not what's happening.

---

That's right, because they're women*

Long overdue.

"Contract is up this June, time to shop around Bjork. How about a brand that just focuses on athletic apparel and not virtue signaling?"

By God anythin' that don't fit my view oughta be ****canned, NOW!!, Bjork, ya hear me!!

How about Fubu, or Chuck Taylor, Black Hi Tops?

I humbly suggest "British Knights".

Time to call up Big Baller Brand.

No.
Drop them.
A fatty is not an athlete unless it's a buffet.

Gig'em

AggieOO said:

---

UA supports BLM, so most of this board will hate them too.

---

As we should. They're simply evil POS!!

Whispers: "Jumpman is just Nike with a different logo."

all in on New Balance

When did Americans get so fragile? A little bit of resilience goes a long way.

We're a big enough school that we should be negotiating for our own private-label brand. It could be made by someone in China, or another major company, but it shouldn't be Adidas, Nike, etc. It should be US. 12th Man Apparel or something.

Sbisa Chef said:

---

We're a big enough school that we should be negotiating for our own private-label brand. It could be made by someone in China, or another major company, but it shouldn't be Adidas, Nike, etc. It should be US. 12th Man Apparel or something.

---

Are you serious? You think that will really excite the 18yo kids we recruit?

TXAGFAN said:

---

Sbisa Chef said:

---

We're a big enough school that we should be negotiating for our own private-label brand. It could be made by someone in China, or another major company, but it shouldn't be Adidas, Nike, etc. It should be US. 12th Man Apparel or something.

---

Are you serious? You think that will really excite the 18yo kids we recruit?

---

yea this is pretty bad

What about BK Knights? Awesome with the pimp cane!

1. Literally every major sports apparel brand is involved in "woke-ism" of some sort;

2. To the people who point out most National Champions have been Nike schools...that's a correlation/causation issue. Likely, its related to fact Nike has most schools more than anything else, unless you think Nike has some sort of secret innovation that contributes to player performance;

3. The only brands currently involved in major football apparel are Nike, Adidas, Underarmour, and Jumpman (which is Nike). Beyond them, I don't know of any brands that are even interested in a major deal, or have the resources to get involved with one;

4. I do remember some time back, maybe during the Sumlin Adidas era, someone, involved in Cotton industry, trying to make the point that Cotton was better than synthetic material and, as an Ag school, A&M should go back to Cotton...which I though was dumb, then. Kinda like this topic.

Crocs

Can we just go back to the '90s?

Carhartt or GTFO…..oh wait they woke jabbers…..
DULUTH TRADING or GTFO

Champion has a pretty broad line.

aggiewoodie said:

---

1. Literally every major sports apparel brand is involved in "woke-ism" of some sort;

2. To the people who point out most National Champions have been Nike schools...that's a correlation/causation issue. Likely, its related to fact Nike has most schools more than anything else, unless you think Nike has some sort of secret innovation that contributes to player performance;

3. The only brands currently involved in major football apparel are Nike, Adidas, Underarmour, and Jumpman (which is Nike). Beyond them, I don't know of any brands that are even interested in a major deal, or have the resources to get involved with one;

4. I do remember some time back, maybe during the Sumlin Adidas era, someone, involved in Cotton industry, trying to make the point that Cotton was better than synthetic material and, as an Ag school, A&M should go back to Cotton...which I though was dumb, then. Kinda like this topic.

---

New balance for life

larry culpepper said:

---

I definitely roll my eyes at over the top woke s**t, but the fact of the matter is, if being "woke" was unprofitable, companies would not be doing it.

---

Ask Subway how their woke ass is doing…

Dude, it's 2022. Who cares. If it doesn't directly affect you why complain