The fans wanted best four. They rejected conference champions. The result of that is the CFP selection committee essentially picks the best zer-loss teams, seeds them, and occasionally bumps a weaker zero-loss team with a one-loss team with a solid resume against the top teams.

IF we were a two loss team AND played three top 5 teams and beat one AND had a top 10 win as well, we MIGHT have been able to dislodge a one-loss team this year. We have a rare, very difficult schedule. But the loss to Auburn almost certainly eliminates even the slightest possibility of the scenario I described happening.

We shouldn't make any strength of schedule comparisons unless there is a tangible, realizable benefit for comparing.

It's unlikely Baylor or SMU will survive undefeated until the committee picks. But if they do and the selection committee picks either, they likely deserve it.

OutdoorAg said:

---

Dude, leave SMU fans alone. After the hell they have endured the last 25-30 years, let them enjoy their ride. Sure their schedule is a lot weaker than ours, but who cares. They are 7-0 and for SMU, that is amazing. Good luck Ponies.

---

I'm old enough to remember when SMU was good and we actually feared playing them. Before the death penalty they had gotten very good. I was at A&M two years after the pony express but still saw pretty strong team before the death penalty.

SoupNazi2001 said:

---

This is where Aggie fans can be just as insufferable. We aren't very good this year but think we are better than we are because we play in the SEC and would easily beat all teams in the Big 12 except for OU even though we consistently lost to mid level teams when we were in the conference. I'm not confident we would beat K State, OSU and Iowa St. Kansas St won at Miss St. Outside of the top 5 in the SEC, the rest of the conference is very mediocre this year.

---

But...but...but my daddy (Bama) can beat your daddy (OU).

Right now the Ags are only the 4th best team in the state behind Baylor, SMU and Texas. All are in Top 25.
Playing an easy schedule has tremendous benefits as all are ranked and a 4-3 Ag team has disappeared.
But, hey, we are in the SEC where butt kickings are the norm. Again, my humble opinion, Ags are outmatched in the best conference in the country. Maybe LSU will prove it to the doubters.

"Lose"
"Loose"
"Then"
"Than"

Learn the difference asshats.

gopitt said:

---

Right now the Ags are only the 4th best team in the state behind Baylor, SMU and Texas. All are in Top 25.
Playing an easy schedule has tremendous benefits as all are ranked and a 4-3 Ag team has disappeared.
But, hey, we are in the SEC where butt kickings are the norm. Again, my humble opinion, Ags are outmatched in the best conference in the country. Maybe LSU will prove it to the doubters.

---

Lol

Quit worrying about it. I know plenty of Baylor fans and all recognize that they would have multiple losses with our schedule. Most just want to be a power 5 after the next realignment

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

KerrvilleAg said:

---

That's nice that you pick an example of a bad team, and the same bad team making a bad play......yet hold up the overall record of teams (smu, bu) that CLEARLY play overall weaker competition. We'd beat the snot out of both of them.

---

Sagarin has Baylor opponents ranked

-Iowa St (17)
-Okalahoma St (26)
-Kansas St (36)
-Texas Tech (47)

Aggies have played

-Bama (2)
-Clemson (4)
-Auburn (7)
-Ole Miss (57)
-Arkansas (88)

Aggie have had 3 really difficult games so far. Ole Miss and Arkansas suck and are worse than the other teams Baylor has played.

The point is that the SEC West is super top heavy. The bottom teams are bad. Can't just say SEC SEC SEC and change that. Big 12 has pretty good parity this year outside of Kansas.

---

The same Kansas that hung 48 points, 569 yards, and lead the sips in Austin with 4 seconds left in the game?

Keep reaching.

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

KerrvilleAg said:

---

That's nice that you pick an example of a bad team, and the same bad team making a bad play......yet hold up the overall record of teams (smu, bu) that CLEARLY play overall weaker competition. We'd beat the snot out of both of them.

---

Sagarin has Baylor opponents ranked

-Iowa St (17)
-Okalahoma St (26)
-Kansas St (36)
-Texas Tech (47)

Aggies have played

-Bama (2)
-Clemson (4)
-Auburn (7)
-Ole Miss (57)
-Arkansas (88)

Aggie have had 3 really difficult games so far. Ole Miss and Arkansas suck and are worse than the other teams Baylor has played.

The point is that the SEC West is super top heavy. The bottom teams are bad. Can't just say SEC SEC SEC and change that. Big 12 has pretty good parity this year outside of Kansas.

---

https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/

Since you brought up Sagarin, let's take a look at those rankings. Texas, Baylor, and A&M are all almost right next to each other. The sips and baylol would both lost in Oxford.

We would obviously out-athlete SMU to a convincing victory.

I am not sure our offense could score enough points to beat Baylor.

Adorable Mason Reeves said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

KerrvilleAg said:

---

That's nice that you pick an example of a bad team, and the same bad team making a bad play......yet hold up the overall record of teams (smu, bu) that CLEARLY play overall weaker competition. We'd beat the snot out of both of them.

---

Sagarin has Baylor opponents ranked

-Iowa St (17)
-Okalahoma St (26)
-Kansas St (36)
-Texas Tech (47)

Aggies have played

-Bama (2)
-Clemson (4)
-Auburn (7)
-Ole Miss (57)
-Arkansas (88)

Aggie have had 3 really difficult games so far. Ole Miss and Arkansas suck and are worse than the other teams Baylor has played.

The point is that the SEC West is super top heavy. The bottom teams are bad. Can't just say SEC SEC SEC and change that. Big 12 has pretty good parity this year outside of Kansas.

---

The same Kansas that hung 48 points, 569 yards, and lead the sips in Austin with 4 seconds left in the game?

Keep reaching.

---

Like the poster above said, K State went to Starkville and beat Miss St by 7. Baylor won at K State by 19.

A&M gets Miss St at home. Let's put our money where our mouth is. Transitive property is dumb but those results would imply that the Aggies should win by 2 TDs at least.

Adorable Mason Reeves said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

KerrvilleAg said:

---

That's nice that you pick an example of a bad team, and the same bad team making a bad play......yet hold up the overall record of teams (smu, bu) that CLEARLY play overall weaker competition. We'd beat the snot out of both of them.

---

Sagarin has Baylor opponents ranked

-Iowa St (17)
-Okalahoma St (26)
-Kansas St (36)
-Texas Tech (47)

Aggies have played

-Bama (2)
-Clemson (4)
-Auburn (7)
-Ole Miss (57)
-Arkansas (88)

Aggie have had 3 really difficult games so far. Ole Miss and Arkansas suck and are worse than the other teams Baylor has played.

The point is that the SEC West is super top heavy. The bottom teams are bad. Can't just say SEC SEC SEC and change that. Big 12 has pretty good parity this year outside of Kansas.

---

https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/

Since you brought up Sagarin, let's take a look at those rankings. Texas, Baylor, and A&M are all almost right next to each other. The sips and baylol would both lost in Oxford.

---

If by right next to, you mean 3 spots lower than.

Quote:

---

Iowa State is pretty good.

---

Yeah, they played amazing when they beat the University of Northern Iowa by 3 points in triple OT.

*snicker*

Ill be honest, I hate Baylor fans more than any other fan base. And I grew up in Waco. They are insufferable. And their football program should have been shut down after Art Briles. One of the most corrupt athletic programs out there.

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

Adorable Mason Reeves said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

KerrvilleAg said:

---

That's nice that you pick an example of a bad team, and the same bad team making a bad play......yet hold up the overall record of teams (smu, bu) that CLEARLY play overall weaker competition. We'd beat the snot out of both of them.

---

Sagarin has Baylor opponents ranked

-Iowa St (17)
-Okalahoma St (26)
-Kansas St (36)
-Texas Tech (47)

Aggies have played

-Bama (2)
-Clemson (4)
-Auburn (7)
-Ole Miss (57)
-Arkansas (88)

Aggie have had 3 really difficult games so far. Ole Miss and Arkansas suck and are worse than the other teams Baylor has played.

The point is that the SEC West is super top heavy. The bottom teams are bad. Can't just say SEC SEC SEC and change that. Big 12 has pretty good parity this year outside of Kansas.

---

https://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/

Since you brought up Sagarin, let's take a look at those rankings. Texas, Baylor, and A&M are all almost right next to each other. The sips and baylol would both lost in Oxford.

---

If by right next to, you mean 3 spots lower than.

---

A&M has 3 losses, so your t-shirt dumpster fire teams should be ranked much hire, given one is undefeated and the other only has two losses. Must be that the SEC is respected and frankly, that drives you and the other trolls nuts@ (hence you people camping out on the zoo, endlessly and tirelessly crying about A&M and the SEC).

Both have players that could start for us. Plus they both have better quarterbacks than we have. How did that happen?

ashley said:

---

Both have players that could start for us. Plus they both have better quarterbacks than we have. How did that happen?

---

"us"....haha, sure...right buddy. Seriously, how many socks do levypantsEOY, gopitt, and DKR87 have? You guys are truly psychotic. Thousands upon thousands of posts, all under the premise of being and Aggie and all about how much A&M sucks, etc. You guys are the same type of obsessive weirdos that frequent dark websites, pretending to be women.

SMU fan have had nothing to be proud of in a generation so let them enjoy this.

Baylor fans enabled rapists in exchange for wins, so they can all go f*** themselves.

KerrvilleAg said:

---

We would beat the ever lovin snot out of both of them. I don't care what their record is, they best team they've played is barely better than the worse we've played.

---

You can assert this all day long but you can't prove it. We haven't BEATEN a team better than Baylor's best win (Iowa St.) and maybe only slightly better than SMU's best (whoever that may be). Just because we've played and lost to Bama and Clemson doesn't make us any better.

My guess is that yes, we probably would beat both, but don't fall for the nonsense that "you played a tougher schedule so you're better" when you lost the games against the better opponents.

That program is trash, I don't care what little moment of glory they are getting this season.

No need to go psycho on me when I was just pointing out the obvious.

I'd love to see Baylol win it all in the Ole Dumpster Fire.....wouldn't that be great?!? Just when Texas says they're baaaaack, it's Baylol!!!

You do realize that even if Tech would have gotten the recovery didn't mean they win. Baylor most likely would of held them to a field goal attempt and what if they missed it?!? Game would have continued any way. Baylor defense did a good job stopping Tech most of the game.

Let me guess....Baylor Law?

OutdoorAg said:

---

Dude, leave SMU fans alone. After the hell they have endured the last 25-30 years, let them enjoy their ride. Sure their schedule is a lot weaker than ours, but who cares. They are 7-0 and for SMU, that is amazing. Good luck Ponies.

---

Yep, SMU fans are excited but know their place in the bigger picture. Baylolr fans are the most thin-skinned fans that are out there and did not give two ****s when Briles covered up the sexual predators on their team, even defended him publicly, angry at the media for somehow making it all up.

ashley said:

---

No need to go psycho on me when I was just pointing out the obvious.

---

The only thing psychotic is spending the time it takes to post thousands and thousands of posts pretending to be a disgruntled Aggie, while fooling nobody. Seriously, it's lunacy. It's even worse when you compound it across multiple socks. What a wasted life. You might need help.

I haven't followed or thought about Baylor in several years. Can't imagine why anyone would care about such a rotten program and school, regardless of their win/loss record.

Remember 2012? We were just as bad. "Doesn't matter. Beat Bama, won Heisman." "Bama's new rival"

Hell, read through this thread. Most of our fans are still insufferable simply because Alabama wins a lot. Some even think we get something out of Alabama winning.

BayLoL Bold

When it's all said and done, they're still Baylor.

Baylor has minimum three losses left on thier schedule. Maybe 4.

SMU may win out.

The did win in stillwater for first time since.... drumroll please..... oh wait don't care.