Is defenseless receiver not a call anymore?
It's not a call I like, but that was it if it's still a call.
It's not a call I like, but that was it if it's still a call.
## Official Whorns vs. Corndogs Game Thread ##
73,673 Views |
927 Replies |
Last: 5 yr ago by Threadbare
No targeting if it's sip
Forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless receiver.
Anyone have a name for that?
Anyone have a name for that?
No slow replay to see that hit ?
Eff u refs
Eff u refs
That was clear targeting
They own the SEC officials,too.
Garbage. I hate refs
It's why the best coaches have abandoned the hurry up. Even if you score your defense is exhausted.Threadbare said:
Not to be greedy, but LSU needs to give the D a breather before they score...
Aren't these SEC refs?
Looked like a launch to the head to me
SEC refs supposedly
LSU timeout to look at replay?
TRUMP 2020! KEEP AMERICA GREAT!
CNN is very fake news.
I Stand with Sul Ross.
#NotAnotherDime
BLM is a lie.
CNN is very fake news.
I Stand with Sul Ross.
#NotAnotherDime
BLM is a lie.
JMR_2016 said:
Does the game look sepia toned to anyone else?
Yes, WTF?? Is this game being broadcast by Instagram?
No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:
- Launcha player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
- A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
- Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
- Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
Time for an int tigahs !!!!
When in question, it is a foul!!HowdyTAMU said:
No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent (See Note 2 below) with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). (A.R. 9-1-4-I-VI)
Note 1: "Targeting" means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball. Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to:
- Launcha player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area
- A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground
- Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area
- Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet
Isn't there a SEC Twitter thing we can ask?
Maybe Sec refs don't want to seem like they're, "on the payroll".
That was utterly ridiculous.
Except that wasn't. Looked like a body blow to me but I figured with the woosified rules with the blind side block they now have that any shot to a defenseless receiver would be considered targeting.
According to my dvr slo mo that was helmet to face mask/neck area of an airborne receiver.
No replays and no discussion from the crew. It drives me crazy. Why cant people just call it the way they see it instead of protecting the brand.
This is why you don't want to play Texas again.
What a ****e called game
Hit to the body...watch your replay again. Some of y'all are blind.
Sips and the referees that love them. A romance that's as old as football in Texas. It will never change.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Texas has all the momentum this half.
bowhuntr said:
Hit to the body...watch your replay again. Some of y'all are blind.
Defenseless ****ing receiver you dumbass.
bowhuntr said:
Hit to the body...watch your replay again. Some of y'all are blind.
Sure dude
Tackle LSU !!!!
Wow, LSU Defense got soft
LSU is choking
LSU's offense better not have hiccup the rest of the game, because the D looks done...
The vaunted LSU defense can't tackle worth $heet.
Defense is wearing down. The B12 offense is taking a toll
DannyDuberstein
Kyler to Spav.. **** you I don't want play for you.
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
73
aggiegolfer2012
Kyler to Spav.. **** you I don't want play for you.
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
68