Jacks Smirking BAS said:
hockeyag said:
I bring up the money aspect because a number of pro game posters believe it brings us more money.
Still waiting for the answer.
Higher ticket prices and resale values, ancillary revenues, merchandise, higher TV ratings that can lead to more lucrative TV contracts, merchandise, ad revenue for game audio streams, local business sales and tax revenues, and did I mention merchandise?
Rivalry games create excitement, excitement creates demand, demand creates potential to make money. Are you truly not able to grasp this or are you trying to keep the hay from falling out of this straw man argument?
We aren't going to charge a higher price for season tickets the years that we play t.u. at home. So, that takes out all but about 10,000 tickets. We already charge a premium for marquee games--this one will not produce noticeably more, and, if it takes the place of our games with schools like Clemson and UCLA, then it will be a wash.
Resale values don't do much for A&M, other than whatever commission they take on Flash seats (pocket change).
This game would be a regional game of interest--the ratings would not be anything special, particularly depending on when it was played. If we screwed over the rest of the SEC by asking them to shuffle the schedule so that we could play this on a more limited window during Thanksgiving weekend, and then play it on Thursday, or worse yet, Friday morning/afternoon, then it might get marginally better ratings, but at the expense of screwing up everyone's Thanksgiving (and with few students in town).
Local businesses would actually fare worse than having someone like Clemson come in.
In the end, it's about nostalgia, and people wanting to have bragging rights at the office water cooler, and that is it.