Pretty weird stuff

The uncanceled stamp makes me think logistics was an afterthought or just-in-case the author couldn't swing by (people were around) and drop it in the mailbox.

Surely the Sumlin's have cameras they could check for leads.

Thought I saw the word "please". I dont think thats a word Id use in a hate letter.

So... somebody faked a IMb?

From the standards...

Quote:

---

NOTE: The STID value is fixed at 009 until all MPE has been modified to distinguish
barcode construct based on Barcode ID field at which time other STID values may be defined.

---

So... we are to believe someone wanted to send an anonymous letter. The placed a stamp and return address.

Why add a barcode? I'm fairly technical and knowledgeable. It would never occur to me to put a barcode on a letter to send. So, this is someone who is familiar with sending mail.

If the STID remained fixed at the default, does that mean someone created the barcode and didn't complete creating it, in order to print?

Would that be an invalid barcode and would it still process? Or did someone want people to believe it was sent by mail, but was hand delivered?

If it was created at 11pm on Tues it wouldn't have been in the USPS possession until Wednesday. When was the letter posted on twitter? 6pm on Thurs.

DallasAg 94 said:

---

So... somebody faked a IMb?

From the standards...

Quote:

---

NOTE: The STID value is fixed at 009 until all MPE has been modified to distinguish
barcode construct based on Barcode ID field at which time other STID values may be defined.

---

So... we are to believe someone wanted to send an anonymous letter. The placed a stamp and return address.

Why add a barcode? I'm fairly technical and knowledgeable. It would never occur to me to put a barcode on a letter to send. So, this is someone who is familiar with sending mail.

If the STID remained fixed at the default, does that mean someone created the barcode and didn't complete creating it, in order to print?

Would that be an invalid barcode and would it still process? Or did someone want people to believe it was sent by mail, but was hand delivered?

If it was created at 11pm on Tues it wouldn't have been in the USPS possession until Wednesday. When was the letter posted on twitter? 6pm on Thurs.

---

We need someone to dumb this down. One thread says nothing to see here and Another says it was hand delivered. Can someone make the "illerate mail understanding " thread for us dumbs?

its was mailed

nai06 said:

---

its was mailed

---

You can't dismiss the possibility of Sumlin having an underground network of postal barcode counterfeiters!

Couldn't you get DNA off of the letter?
Run a cross search for matches, and go from there?

Buford T. Justice said:

---

Couldn't you get DNA off of the letter?
Run a cross search for matches, and go from there?

---

Only if they are already in the system.

riverrataggie said:

---

Buford T. Justice said:

---

Couldn't you get DNA off of the letter?
Run a cross search for matches, and go from there?

---

Only if they are already in the system.

---

Pardon my naivete, but do you mean the criminal system? Or the medical system?

Buford T. Justice said:

---

riverrataggie said:

---

Buford T. Justice said:

---

Couldn't you get DNA off of the letter?
Run a cross search for matches, and go from there?

---

Only if they are already in the system.

---

Pardon my naivete, but do you mean the criminal system? Or the medical system?

---

Criminal. Medical information is a complete different ball game.

People think there's some magical database out there with everyone's DNA in it

/Alex Jones

AGnCS said:

---

People think there's some magical database out there with everyone's DNA in it

/Alex Jones

---

The matrix has it.

nai06 said:

---

its was mailed

---

the correct term is "it was postaled"

referencing mail is sexist and excludes femailed and transmaileds.

You must not know his politics if you think he's serious.

SeattleAgJr said:

---

nai06 said:

---

its was mailed

---

the correct term is "it was postaled"

referencing mail is sexist and excludes femailed and transmaileds.

---

S.A. Aggie said:

---

No excuse for this. Against any and all Aggie code of conduct. No room for this crap. May have not even have been written by an Aggie. If someone can hack a twitter account then they can send letters to stir the pot. IMO, the return address is most likely false. In any case, the author of the letter is a coward in the worst way.

---

You think the return address is most likely false, do ya?

Tripacer said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Question? Who Rachel Joy Baribeau?

---

College sports radio personality (Sirius 84) and longtime friend of the Sumlin family.

---

Aaahh, I was wondering why her twitter feed stated Charlene had called her and cried on the phone about this. Thought she was a reporter of sorts so that seemed odd. And Baribeau's tweet (retweet?) is when it went viral, as far as I can tell. (twitter is still a foreign universe to me and will stay that way.)

Thanks.

I declare: Shenanigans!

aggiehawg said:

---

The post office doesn't cancel stamps anymore?? Or are my eyes really that bad???

---

It's not 1987. They often don't.

I'm just surprised none of these letter threads have been locked.

Talon2DSO said:

---

Just my spitballs here, so take it for what it's worth:

1.) Written by a female older than 40.
2.) This was not a first draft. Try writing something while emotional, in cursive. How many mistakes might you have? Letters running together? Letters not fully formed? Emotional writing is fast and rarely keeps up with your mind. This letter was drafted with some deliberation and may have been the final draft.
3.) Letter does not appear to fit envelope
4.) Language is specific "sucks as a coach" odd caveat to add there.
5.) Stamp isn't cancelled, was this actually mailed?
6.) The "or else" seems added as an after thought
7.) Address is the Country Club. A deliberate and forceful attempt to paint the attacker as a Caucasian member of the one percent.
8.) Smudging on certain letters (a, c, g,) suggest the letter was wiped bottom to top by the left hand. However the 'g' in "get lost" has smudges going both up and down. The word "else" is only smudged down (perhaps it was an afterthought)



These things tell me that we are looking for perhaps a sjw professor or grad student that is a big supporter of BLM or other similar group. She hates sports and the elites that finance it. She saw the tweet by Buzbee as an opportunity to advance the skewed perception that minorities are enslaved by the wealthy for entertainment purposes and discarded when the entertainment value no longer exists.

---

When the letter was folded (yes it's easily seen, ink that was not quite dry, the smooth crease and handwriting, suggest it was from a woman. The type of cursive suggests she was not young, and the notion that the paper wasn't 8/12 x 11 suggests they think themselves refined. It all spells a sip lady doing some trolling..

dcrown said:

---

I declare: Shenanigans!

---

We certainly aren't talking about loses to Maryland, Liberty, or UCLA anymore. Smokescreen objective satisfied, no matter whose fan base sent this.