Legitimate question.
Now I'm not eager to play anyone in the Big12...t.u. included.
Does an institution like t.u., actively coordinating with other regional competitors to exclude A&M from potentially lucrative athletic scheduling opportunities, break any anti-competitive or collusion laws? I know its "just football" but there dollars are material and these institutions of higher learning operate their athletic departments as businesses.
As such it seems to me that Dodds (as the AD of the most powerful member of the Big 12) organized a boycott of A&M athletics among regional competitors. Its seems that might rise to some actionable standard of 'collusion' or anti-competitive behavior. An industry or business with a similar scheme to punish a competitor would be exposed to significant risks.
Now I'm not eager to play anyone in the Big12...t.u. included.
Does an institution like t.u., actively coordinating with other regional competitors to exclude A&M from potentially lucrative athletic scheduling opportunities, break any anti-competitive or collusion laws? I know its "just football" but there dollars are material and these institutions of higher learning operate their athletic departments as businesses.
As such it seems to me that Dodds (as the AD of the most powerful member of the Big 12) organized a boycott of A&M athletics among regional competitors. Its seems that might rise to some actionable standard of 'collusion' or anti-competitive behavior. An industry or business with a similar scheme to punish a competitor would be exposed to significant risks.