quote:Pretty telling about this board that it took this many posts to correct the OP.
your*
Same crap as Spaz
quote:
...Is this board really that fickle?...
quote:
For most of the game he had an entire offensive line that had never started a college game. Combine that with a QB playing his first game for A&M and I think he did well. I was very happy with the running game. My only "WTF was that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" moment was the play calling on the 2 drives that allowed UCLA to catch up. More runs, run clock. Our defense was dominating them until he gave the ball back to them in 40 second and 20 second consecutive drives.
quote:
Perfect? No. But to call for his head already is just dense.
It's been said. I'll echo it
First game
Ring rusty qb in his first start for us
3 underclassmen on O line
Missing a decent receiver
Freshman running back in the mix
Playing against a veteran loaded defense who spent the last 4 straight years practicing against mazzones offense specifically
It wasn't THAT bad folks. Not predicting a championship year, but for crying out loud look around the rest of the conference this weekend. It could have gone a lot worse. I have just as high of hopes and expectations as anyone, especially based on the amount of funding dumped into this program lately, but we should at least keep this game in perspective. If anyone had a tremendous schematic advantage in this game it was UCLA and we managed to squeak by even with that sizable handicap going in
quote:quote:
For most of the game he had an entire offensive line that had never started a college game. Combine that with a QB playing his first game for A&M and I think he did well. I was very happy with the running game. My only "WTF was that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" moment was the play calling on the 2 drives that allowed UCLA to catch up. More runs, run clock. Our defense was dominating them until he gave the ball back to them in 40 second and 20 second consecutive drives.
quote:
Discombobulated passing game, especially with our talented receivers.
