That's not what I said at all. In fact, I even said that I have respect for him changing his position and acknowledging it. However, given this specific set of circumstances, you can surely see how this "conversion" can make people be a little skeptical of his true feelings/position. Like I said earlier in this thread, my Nextdoor had a thread with people arguing for their candidates just this past weekend. All the people supporting Slattery were also pushing for SMDs.Willy Wonka said:YellAg2004 said:
While I have a ton of respect for people who will actually step up and own their mistakes/poor decisions, especially in this day and age, I really have to wonder how someone could pull a 180 on something that significant. That's seemingly like the school board equivalent of someone going from hardcore democrat to hardcore republican. Yes it does occasionally happen, but I'm usually a little wary of those people and at the very least, their judgement and decision-making ability.
So you mean you want people who never change their mind on anything. The beauty of a school board is that you will arrive at better decisions as a group than you ever would individually.
So here you have one candidate (for this particular school board position) that is against SMDs, and another candidate that was for SMDs before being converted, but is backed by a bunch of SMD supporters. So if he gets elected, will his position possibly change again? Given that this election will likely determine how SBISD proceeds in the lawsuit, that's a pretty large request for trust, IMO.