Use it or lose it disaster fund... can't skim off the top if you don't use it
htxag09 said:
I'm even more amazed by the new death data being a week old
Should have done it 6 weeks ago. Prepare for peak patients and return to normal.Ag_07 said:
I'd like to know why in the world are we building a temporary med facility at NRG if our hospitals are doing just fine and there are no indications they're gonna be overrun?
TarponChaser said:
That's ridiculous. There's a grand total of like 140 people hospitalized for CV19 in Houston. The peak is projected for like 8 days from now (down from a month just 4 days ago).
Yes, Noah built the Ark before it started raining but this smacks of panicked "do something'ism" because it's looking to be on the decline here.
IrishTxAggie said:
Expand the 69 to 45 ramp!!
That's where it would be best used!!
Bondag said:TarponChaser said:
That's ridiculous. There's a grand total of like 140 people hospitalized for CV19 in Houston. The peak is projected for like 8 days from now (down from a month just 4 days ago).
Yes, Noah built the Ark before it started raining but this smacks of panicked "do something'ism" because it's looking to be on the decline here.
So spend $5,000,000 for temp hospital or shut down the economy? Which one will cost more?
And any money we spend goes to paychecks that will be out back into economy.
No problem addressing the situation, but we have to be smart about it. Spend money where it counts.
Ag_07 said:
I'd like to know why in the world are we building a temporary med facility at NRG if our hospitals are doing just fine and there are no indications they're gonna be overrun?
Bondag said:IrishTxAggie said:
Expand the 69 to 45 ramp!!
That's where it would be best used!!
I am going to miss my 30 minute commute when people start driving again.
TarponChaser said:Bondag said:TarponChaser said:
That's ridiculous. There's a grand total of like 140 people hospitalized for CV19 in Houston. The peak is projected for like 8 days from now (down from a month just 4 days ago).
Yes, Noah built the Ark before it started raining but this smacks of panicked "do something'ism" because it's looking to be on the decline here.
So spend $5,000,000 for temp hospital or shut down the economy? Which one will cost more?
And any money we spend goes to paychecks that will be out back into economy.
No problem addressing the situation, but we have to be smart about it. Spend money where it counts.
What point are you trying to make?
My point was that the construction of this makeshift hospital was a stupid, unnecessary expenditure that is nothing more than officials trying to look like they're doing something, regardless of whether or not it's a smart or necessary action.
Multiple waves that will be easier to contain/deal with than this current one, don't forget that point Mr. Alarmistcone said:
This thing isn't over. There's going to be multiple waves.
Hell, it might even turn into a centralized quarantine/FEMA camp.
Quote:
"This is to be used as a last resort That would mean that our hospitals used up their surge capacity and now will have to use the capacity we are building at NRG," Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo said.
Officials said the project could cost $60 million and the federal government will reimburse the county up to 75%.
"And that $60 million anticipates two full months of operation at full capacity for a 250-bed hospital, essentially a worst-case scenario at 250 beds for two months," Harris County Commissioner R. Jack Cagle said.
Quote:
April 19 is the new projected peak of coronavirus in Texas, according to data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington's School of Medicine. The peak was originally slated for May 2.
Ag_07 said:
Here ya goQuote:
"This is to be used as a last resort That would mean that our hospitals used up their surge capacity and now will have to use the capacity we are building at NRG," Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo said.
Officials said the project could cost $60 million and the federal government will reimburse the county up to 75%.
"And that $60 million anticipates two full months of operation at full capacity for a 250-bed hospital, essentially a worst-case scenario at 250 beds for two months," Harris County Commissioner R. Jack Cagle said.
Also in another story posted 2 hours later there's thisQuote:
April 19 is the new projected peak of coronavirus in Texas, according to data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington's School of Medicine. The peak was originally slated for May 2.
I just don't see the situation here going from where we are now to needing a temporary facility in 11 days.
well you've at least answered the question of why we are taking all of the insane one-size-fits all approach to this in the first place.TXTransplant said:
No politician wants to answer to that.
That's not nearly the best case scenario.Bondag said:TarponChaser said:Bondag said:TarponChaser said:
That's ridiculous. There's a grand total of like 140 people hospitalized for CV19 in Houston. The peak is projected for like 8 days from now (down from a month just 4 days ago).
Yes, Noah built the Ark before it started raining but this smacks of panicked "do something'ism" because it's looking to be on the decline here.
So spend $5,000,000 for temp hospital or shut down the economy? Which one will cost more?
And any money we spend goes to paychecks that will be out back into economy.
No problem addressing the situation, but we have to be smart about it. Spend money where it counts.
What point are you trying to make?
My point was that the construction of this makeshift hospital was a stupid, unnecessary expenditure that is nothing more than officials trying to look like they're doing something, regardless of whether or not it's a smart or necessary action.
If we don't know how many people will be hospitalized and are afraid we will be overrun build a temp hospital. The cost of that vs literally shutting down the city is nil and it puts people to work instead of taking away jobs.
Best case scenario we never use it.
Worst case scenario we do nothing and we need it.
blindey said:well you've at least answered the question of why we are taking all of the insane one-size-fits all approach to this in the first place.TXTransplant said:
No politician wants to answer to that.
do you have a link for that?07ag said:
its shifting based on info as the days go by,, earlier this week it was inline with the us peak of a week from now
Increased testing and faster testing results will allow much more localized quarantine. Faster testing results will also allow doctors to treat the virus before it gets too far gone. Along those same lines, increased understanding of which medicines work best to fight the virus as more studies come out. Large public gatherings will still be put on hold for some time, which should help limit massive outbreaks. Herd immunity will increase over time. And like you said, as masks become more available, hopefully people will be more inclined to wear them when out in public.cone said:
easier to contain?
curious how? masks will certainly help. but there's no surveillance whatsoever at the scale required.