jja79 said:
Ducks is spot on I think. A lot of people are going to have less disposable income for quite a while. People for the most part will be cautious.
While I see your point, I would be curious to see how much of the disposable income really did change pre and post lockdown.
Said another way, I would suspect that most "white collar" (using someone else's words above) jobs are likely uninterrupted in the immediate term as a lot of these can be shifted to WFH arrangements. Absent layoffs here, disposable income should have remained consistent and a bounce back would seem quicker. WFH would allow companies to continue work and the employees to continue to receive paychecks
For those persons who either lost their job or lost income because of it, the question is how much of that income was originally "disposable" and being spent on retail/restaurants/etc. I would suspect, and I'm drawing generalizations, but a majority of these type of jobs aren't creating much "disposable income" on a per person basis.
I don't know, but I would suspect this is more about socioeconomic class and the establishments attracting middle/upper class folks will rebound much quicker than those attracting the lower class. What's the proportion or distribution of that? I have no clue.
I live in central Houston and I suspect most businesses will bounce back in this area rather quickly. Most my neighbors haven't seen anything change other than they are home and not an office.