
These cretins all need to go.

Zemira said:
No one could be bothered to even post the summary.
There could potentially be the option of splitting it up into 2 or 3 districts with 70K-100K students each.ChipFTAC01 said:
I'm pretty sure the last bullet the TEA has after replacing the board is to just dissolve the district and fold it in to a neighboring one. There's no way that will happen with hisd. Usually it's a smaller one that gets folded into a larger one. Happened recently to la marque (Texas City ISD) , North Forest, (HISD) and wilmer Hutchins (DISD)
AgLiving06 said:
The problem that will come is any split will be deemed as racist.
That would involve logic and reasoning to split the district. Has HISD or the cronies running the district ever done anything logical or reasonable?smango05 said:
Doesn't San Antonio have like, 11 school districts?
The obvious divisions on N, S, E, and W would certainly have disparate socioeconomic populations. However, with Texas' Robin Hood method of funding districts, wouldn't that lessen a bit of the blow?
since when has any Democrat run govt body given up power? Too much money and payoffs at stake.lunchbox said:There could potentially be the option of splitting it up into 2 or 3 districts with 70K-100K students each.ChipFTAC01 said:
I'm pretty sure the last bullet the TEA has after replacing the board is to just dissolve the district and fold it in to a neighboring one. There's no way that will happen with hisd. Usually it's a smaller one that gets folded into a larger one. Happened recently to la marque (Texas City ISD) , North Forest, (HISD) and wilmer Hutchins (DISD)
Not everything there is a cesspool!blindey said:
Cross posted the TEA findings re HISD to politics board just to see what will happen and for grins. Wade into that cesspool at your own peril.
The people doing the splitting would be the TEA/Governor which are (today, at least) slightly Republican. It sure wouldn't be the decision of the Mayor or current board.BQ_90 said:since when has any Democrat run govt body given up power? Too much money and payoffs at stake.lunchbox said:There could potentially be the option of splitting it up into 2 or 3 districts with 70K-100K students each.ChipFTAC01 said:
I'm pretty sure the last bullet the TEA has after replacing the board is to just dissolve the district and fold it in to a neighboring one. There's no way that will happen with hisd. Usually it's a smaller one that gets folded into a larger one. Happened recently to la marque (Texas City ISD) , North Forest, (HISD) and wilmer Hutchins (DISD)
blindey said:
Cross posted the TEA findings re HISD to politics board just to see what will happen and for grins. Wade into that cesspool at your own peril.
I'm an active participant over there and contribute to the level of cess in that pool.smango05 said:blindey said:
Cross posted the TEA findings re HISD to politics board just to see what will happen and for grins. Wade into that cesspool at your own peril.
Hey now. Easy on 16
blindey said:I'm an active participant over there and contribute to the level of cess in that pool.smango05 said:blindey said:
Cross posted the TEA findings re HISD to politics board just to see what will happen and for grins. Wade into that cesspool at your own peril.
Hey now. Easy on 16
People spend 90% of the time bemoaning corruption at the federal level, but if those folks played like the local folks, we'd already be Venezuela by now. I'm not saying the big boys are more ethical than the local folks, but at least they play under brighter lights.Zemira said:
An honest opinion of the recommendations from TEA. And I usually don't read the drivel that is normally in the Houston Press, but this is on point.
https://www.houstonpress.com/news/tea-appears-ready-to-oust-the-hisd-school-board-11335718
94chem said:People spend 90% of the time bemoaning corruption at the federal level, but if those folks played like the local folks, we'd already be Venezuela by now. I'm not saying the big boys are more ethical than the local folks, but at least they play under brighter lights.Zemira said:
An honest opinion of the recommendations from TEA. And I usually don't read the drivel that is normally in the Houston Press, but this is on point.
https://www.houstonpress.com/news/tea-appears-ready-to-oust-the-hisd-school-board-11335718
If you surveyed a random 10 local voters, I wonder how many would even know who is responsible for hiring the HISD superintendent? Or could name their own school board rep? (I probably couldn't without looking it up).Quote:
People spend 90% of the time bemoaning corruption at the federal level, but if those folks played like the local folks, we'd already be Venezuela by now. I'm not saying the big boys are more ethical than the local folks, but at least they play under brighter lights.
and it'll end up in court. The rats aren't leaving the ship. every race card in the deck will be played.lunchbox said:The people doing the splitting would be the TEA/Governor which are (today, at least) slightly Republican. It sure wouldn't be the decision of the Mayor or current board.BQ_90 said:since when has any Democrat run govt body given up power? Too much money and payoffs at stake.lunchbox said:There could potentially be the option of splitting it up into 2 or 3 districts with 70K-100K students each.ChipFTAC01 said:
I'm pretty sure the last bullet the TEA has after replacing the board is to just dissolve the district and fold it in to a neighboring one. There's no way that will happen with hisd. Usually it's a smaller one that gets folded into a larger one. Happened recently to la marque (Texas City ISD) , North Forest, (HISD) and wilmer Hutchins (DISD)
The money differential required to get a poor student achievement up to a rich student is astounding. You have to cut rich school budget to the point they can no longer afford textbooks and can only afford first-year teachers. You'd also have to prevent the community from stepping up with donations.smango05 said:
The obvious divisions on N, S, E, and W would certainly have disparate socioeconomic populations. However, with Texas' Robin Hood method of funding districts, wouldn't that lessen a bit of the blow?
agnerd said:The money differential required to get a poor student achievement up to a rich student is astounding. You have to cut rich school budget to the point they can no longer afford textbooks and can only afford first-year teachers. You'd also have to prevent the community from stepping up with donations.smango05 said:
The obvious divisions on N, S, E, and W would certainly have disparate socioeconomic populations. However, with Texas' Robin Hood method of funding districts, wouldn't that lessen a bit of the blow?
For the poor schools, you'd have to keep kids at school until 9pm and virtually eliminate time to do anything except sleep. Homework would be done at school since that's the only way to ensure it gets done. You'd need two shifts of teachers.
Yet there are still quite a few people that want EQUITY no matter the costs. We're pretty close to equality across the state, but nowhere close to equity.