tamc93 said:
Complete Idiot said:
Better find some new water supply, we all saw what happened 2011 and in the couple years after that. Our area had a project to deepen the water intake in Lake Travis for our water supply, the prior intake level was at risk to go above water. I may be paranoid, but I think a historic (and we only have around 150 years of history here) drought could be really bad for this area given the growth.
The point is generally there and there needs to be a focus on building more reservoirs, etc. Things are not that bleak.
Several things changed since then....new reservoir downstream to allow capture for the farmers, change in crop seeds to promote less water use, acceptance of "brownish" lawns, completion of Buchanan Dam improvements, etc.
The city's water plan cannot sell enough water right now due to the conservation efforts.
Plenty of water for my lifetime and several others
I certainly hope so, I certainly hope they are planning for catastrophic droughts. The issues I was recalling are in this article:
https://www.statesman.com/article/20130816/NEWS/308169696They had to lower the intake to 590 feet due to the severity of the drought. Will that be sufficient? Could there be a worse drought than what was starting in 2011? It wouldn't seem likely in the near term, given the historical odds, but it will eventually happen.
You can see LCRA highland lake water consumers here:
https://www.lcra.org/water/water-supply-planning/water-use-summary/ . Take note of the firm contracts and in the increase in municipal usages in just the four year period depicted. The area continues to explode and water usage will continue to sky rocket.
I think there is plenty of water with a well thought out reservoir and distribution system in place - most of what we have is many decades old, beyond the new Scott Arbuckle reservoir you noted. That was the first reservoir added to the LCRA system in 50 years.