1.618 said:
Personally, I find it interesting that people think Blue Bell leadership should be held to account for letting tainted product out of the factory and into schools and hospitals and homes that they knew had the potential to harm some people and kill some people....but think it is absurd to continue social distancing and wearing masks and other things that have been proven effective in slowing a pandemic.
I think that unless you know people in Italy or in New York that are losing family members without benefit of being able to say goodbye and hold funerals to properly mourn their loved ones, it is easy enough to think it won't happen to you. I am in the minority but my haircut is not more important than the life of your parent or grandparent. And it is certainly not more important than the life of *my* parents or my grandparents.
I lived in New York for a time and have friends and family there. And business colleagues in Milan (in the Lombardy red zone) have reached out to assure me the threat is real and warn me to take it seriously. When they tell me about the Italian military digging mass graves, trust me I take it very seriously. And I've seen friends even here in Texas having to mourn and comfort loved ones at a distance from deaths not even related to Covid (actually talked with one this morning walking through this). It's hard to see through online interactions, but I think very few educated/informed folks are treating this as "the flu" and not a big deal.
And I don't think it's fair to imply people don't care about parents and grandparents. Come on, believe the best of people and that they're acting in good faith, even if you don't agree with their actions.
Many of us simply observe a disconnect between the empirical data we have seen locally (over a long period of time) and what has been unfolding in those areas you mentioned. So if you see public health, personal freedom, and the industry/economy (that created the excess resources we have now as a nation to fight the disease) as all intertwined, then you rationally feel we should carefully move forward opening up, to be able to preserve the long term health of the vulnerable, both the generation before us and the generation that comes after.
What I don't hear often from those who think we're moving too fast is an alternative. If you've accepted the fact that we can't contain this virus and are willing to agree that a sustained suspension of rights and economy for the possibility of vaccine 18 months out isn't feasible.... Well, if not now, when? What metrics are we missing that we should have?
Personally, I felt the governor's presser yesterday showed he's acting very rationally. Fine, argue he should move faster or slower (based on where you fall in this debate), but the mental framework he's applying to the process seems about right.