Outdoors
Sponsored by

Texas Constitutional Carry passes House

59,649 Views | 604 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by txyaloo
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The idiot asking the questions right now doesn't realize he just watermelon slingshotted himself in the face.

In that criminals don't care about the law in the first place. Why punish law abiding citizens because criminals won't follow the law...complete idiot.
BigHead 04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree what a ****ing moron
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Truly, this issue is very simple to understand.

Unless you are in government and prefer an unarmed citizenry, there is ZERO reason for anyone to oppose responsible, law abiding people the right to defend themselves.

Clearly, there are a lot of despots and people with the IQ of a lobster in this country.

Many of them are both.
MarineAggie95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Joined in the video feed late. How long are they allowing these questions to go? So far it is the same questions from the original debate it seems
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GuN sHoW lOoPhOlE
Troy91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Senate Dems who are against the bill are using the old stalling tactic for as long as possible.

This is what happens late in the session. This bill might make it but some other bill will now die due to their delays.

Far too normal at this point in the session.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who joined the dems? I thought it was 18-12 all the way through the initial senate vote
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troy91 said:

Senate Dems who are against the bill are using the old stalling tactic for as long as possible.

This is what happens late in the session. This bill might make it but some other bill will now die due to their delays.

Far too normal at this point in the session.
Is theis the constitution carry bill yall are talking about?

Sorry. On my phone.
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.
Troy91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, constitutional carry just passed the Senate.

The same Senators were making the same silly points on the bill. AGAIN.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troy91 said:

Yes, constitutional carry just passed the Senate.

The same Senators were making the same silly points on the bill. AGAIN.
Awesome.

So just to clarify since I am a little out of touch right now.

It has passed both the House and Senate and is headed to the Governor?

Thanks
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agsalaska said:

Troy91 said:

Yes, constitutional carry just passed the Senate.

The same Senators were making the same silly points on the bill. AGAIN.
Awesome.

So just to clarify since I am a little out of touch right now.

It has passed both the House and Senate and is headed to the Governor?

Thanks
Roger that
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?


schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.facebook.com/100007162834306/posts/2904082016507198/
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HB 1927: Constitutional Carry: PASSED!
  • The House and the Senate have taken their FINAL vote, approving the conference committee report! This means the bill now goes to the Governor, who has already promised to sign the bill.
  • The bill will go into effect on September 1.
  • We are thrilled with this historical step and believe that the passage of HB 1927 represents the strongest stand Texas has taken for gun rights since the Alamo!
  • The final version does include some amendments that we opposed such as barring a few small classes of people from carrying a handgun even though they can legally possess a firearm. The Senate insisted on these due the strong influence of the law enforcement organizations. We will work next session to fix these issues.
  • However, the bill is still extremely positive. It absolutely recognizes the right of law-abiding citizens to carry handguns, open or concealed, without asking for permission, in nearly all of the same places as LTC carriers can currently legally carry.


https://texas.gunowners.org/goa-texas-bullet-5-24-2021/
Caliber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any one following this closer...
Does this mean it will now be three signs if someone wants to ban carry?
46.03 for unlicensed
30.06/30.07 for licensed?

Based on reading 46.03 applies only to unlicensed, can still licensed carry it no 30.06/30.07.

What if they only keep existing 30.06/30.07 signage? Can't carry with a license but can with no license?
DriftwoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They mentioned a 30.05 in the debate
Caliber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DriftwoodAg said:

They mentioned a 30.05 in the debate

Based on my reading, which could be way wrong...
House version was 30.05, Senate version used 46.03.

Conference report went with Senate version.
Caliber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brad06ag said:

DriftwoodAg said:

They mentioned a 30.05 in the debate

Based on my reading, which could be way wrong...
House version was 30.05, Senate version used 46.03.

Conference report went with Senate version.

Strike that. Senate version didn't seem to mention it. Conference report came up with the new wording.

Then again.. How all this screw ball stuff comes together needs to have a lot more clarity
erudite
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brad06ag said:

Brad06ag said:

DriftwoodAg said:

They mentioned a 30.05 in the debate

Based on my reading, which could be way wrong...
House version was 30.05, Senate version used 46.03.

Conference report went with Senate version.

Strike that. Senate version didn't seem to mention it. Conference report came up with the new wording.

Then again.. How all this screw ball stuff comes together needs to have a lot more clarity
I think 46.03 is to ban both open and conceal carry of weapons. It seems to be to simplify the signage requirement so that they don't have to post 30.06 AND 30.07.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well... If it's concealed well enough, they will never know...until, of course, a incident occurs where they find their girly asses praying to a God they don't believe in that someone has a gun.
txyaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
erudite said:

Brad06ag said:

Brad06ag said:

DriftwoodAg said:

They mentioned a 30.05 in the debate

Based on my reading, which could be way wrong...
House version was 30.05, Senate version used 46.03.

Conference report went with Senate version.

Strike that. Senate version didn't seem to mention it. Conference report came up with the new wording.

Then again.. How all this screw ball stuff comes together needs to have a lot more clarity
I think 46.03 is to ban both open and conceal carry of weapons. It seems to be to simplify the signage requirement so that they don't have to post 30.06 AND 30.07.
30.05 (Criminal trespass) has been amended to require signage to ban firearms. Has to be the verbiage below, in english/spanish, at all entrances, conspicuously placed in contrasting colors. This applies to unlicensed carry. There is still a defense to prosecution if you have an LTC.

Quote:

(1) includes language that is identical to or substantially similar to the following: "Pursuant to Section 30. 05, Penal Code (criminal trespass), a person may not enter this property with a firearm"
30.06 and 30.07 remain the same only referencing TPC 46.03 instead of TPC 46.035 which was UCW by license holder and has been struck. 46.035 was merged into 46.03

43.03 is the places prohibited by statute like amusement parks, hospitals, polling places, jails, etc. Based on my reading, places off limits by statute would only need to put up a 43.03 sign which would supersede 30.05, 06 and 07. Places that aren't prohibited by statute will still have to put up 05, 06, and 07 signs to ban guns. There is still an exception requiring 51% locations, hospitals, and amusement parks to put up 30.06 signs to ban LTC.


Other things I see:
- campus carry only applies to LTC holders
- tabc blue signs have been repealed
- UCW is no longer a 3rd degree felony when carrying in a place that serves alcohol
- it appears govt buildings will be able to ban unlicensed carry. 411.209 of the govt code wasn't amended to include unlicensed carry. I think this was a Senate compromise to allow banning of unlicensed carry at the Capitol
Caliber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This conference report makes it all really hard to follow in reality...

but the section 46.03 stuff seems interesting. Forces them to post signs, otherwise gives you a defense to prosecution if you "didn't know" you could not carry.

I need to see all the updated statutes to read clearly...


Also, In the conference report, did they just allow licensed carry in 51% establishments without posting 30.06/07 or am i misreading this??

Quote:

(p) Sections 46.03(a)(7), (11), and (13) do not apply if the actor: (1) carries a handgun on the premises or other property, as applicable; (2) holds a license to carry a handgun issued under Subchapter H. Chapter 411, Government Code; and (3) was not given effective notice under Section 30.06 or 30.07 of this code or Section 411.204, Government Code, as applicable.
So going back up, 46.03(a)(7) is (pertaining to prohibited locations):
Quote:

(7) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was it ever clarified what Dan Patrick supposedly did to "poison pill" the legislation?
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It had to do with the Senate amendments and something about the scope of the bill and amendment being related. The Dems tried to use it when it went back to the house and quickly got shut down. The pressure applied by grassroots 2A community really did reel that in pretty quickly.
txyaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brad06ag said:

This conference report makes it all really hard to follow in reality...

but the section 46.03 stuff seems interesting. Forces them to post signs, otherwise gives you a defense to prosecution if you "didn't know" you could not carry.

I need to see all the updated statutes to read clearly...


Also, In the conference report, did they just allow licensed carry in 51% establishments without posting 30.06/07 or am i misreading this??

Quote:

(p) Sections 46.03(a)(7), (11), and (13) do not apply if the actor: (1) carries a handgun on the premises or other property, as applicable; (2) holds a license to carry a handgun issued under Subchapter H. Chapter 411, Government Code; and (3) was not given effective notice under Section 30.06 or 30.07 of this code or Section 411.204, Government Code, as applicable.
So going back up, 46.03(a)(7) is (pertaining to prohibited locations):
Quote:

(7) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;

46.03, .035, and .04 have always been a confusing jumbled mess with the way the Legislature has amended them over the years. All the locations listed in 46.03 are off limits to carry by statute unless there is an exception granted. This has been the case for years and was always the source of confusion for hospitals, amusement parks, and churches (until removed last session).

The state is now saying if you are carrying a gun at a prohibited by statute location, and are asked to leave by a person with authority over that property, and do leave, you have a defense to prosecution for UCW. It also says property owners MAY place a 46.03 sign to inform the public those locations are prohibited by statute, and if you walk past one of those signs while still carrying, you lose your DTP.

All 46.03 signage would apply to unlicensed and LTC holders except at certain TABC licensed locations, hospitals, and amusement parks. Those locations would need to post 30.06/07 signage to ban CC by LTC, but unlicensed carry could be banned by the 46.03 language.

As far as being able to carry in 51% locations, that still isn't legal. Gov code 411.204 is the 51% law for TABC licensed premises. 46.03(p) is saying if a 51% sign is not posted, you aren't UCW. TABC is pretty strict about making sure licensed premises have the right signs up.

We effectively have 3 classes of signs under this new law.

1) 46.03 - applies to all forms of carry (unlicensed and LTC) at places prohibited by statute. Most of these locations had 06/07 signs up already
-LTC can carry at amusement parks and hospitals as long as 06/07 signs aren't posted
2) 30.05 bans unlicensed carry (LTC holders not impacted)
3) 30.06/07 bans licensed carry
DriftwoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txyaloo said:

Brad06ag said:

This conference report makes it all really hard to follow in reality...

but the section 46.03 stuff seems interesting. Forces them to post signs, otherwise gives you a defense to prosecution if you "didn't know" you could not carry.

I need to see all the updated statutes to read clearly...


Also, In the conference report, did they just allow licensed carry in 51% establishments without posting 30.06/07 or am i misreading this??

Quote:

(p) Sections 46.03(a)(7), (11), and (13) do not apply if the actor: (1) carries a handgun on the premises or other property, as applicable; (2) holds a license to carry a handgun issued under Subchapter H. Chapter 411, Government Code; and (3) was not given effective notice under Section 30.06 or 30.07 of this code or Section 411.204, Government Code, as applicable.
So going back up, 46.03(a)(7) is (pertaining to prohibited locations):
Quote:

(7) on the premises of a business that has a permit or license issued under Chapter 25, 28, 32, 69, or 74, Alcoholic Beverage Code, if the business derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, as determined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission under Section 104.06, Alcoholic Beverage Code;

46.03, .035, and .04 have always been a confusing jumbled mess with the way the Legislature has amended them over the years. All the locations listed in 46.03 are off limits to carry by statute unless there is an exception granted. This has been the case for years and was always the source of confusion for hospitals, amusement parks, and churches (until removed last session).

The state is now saying if you are carrying a gun at a prohibited by statute location, and are asked to leave by a person with authority over that property, and do leave, you have a defense to prosecution for UCW. It also says property owners MAY place a 46.03 sign to inform the public those locations are prohibited by statute, and if you walk past one of those signs while still carrying, you lose your DTP.

All 46.03 signage would apply to unlicensed and LTC holders except at certain TABC licensed locations, hospitals, and amusement parks. Those locations would need to post 30.06/07 signage to ban CC by LTC, but unlicensed carry could be banned by the 46.03 language.

As far as being able to carry in 51% locations, that still isn't legal. Gov code 411.204 is the 51% law for TABC licensed premises. 46.03(p) is saying if a 51% sign is not posted, you aren't UCW. TABC is pretty strict about making sure licensed premises have the right signs up.

We effectively have 3 classes of signs under this new law.

1) 46.03 - applies to all forms of carry (unlicensed and LTC) at places prohibited by statute. Most of these locations had 06/07 signs up already
-LTC can carry at amusement parks and hospitals as long as 06/07 signs aren't posted
2) 30.05 bans unlicensed carry (LTC holders not impacted)
3) 30.06/07 bans licensed carry


It seems like you should be able to carry at a lot more places since a ton of bars started serving more food to open during covid
Ogre09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any reason to renew an LTC when it comes due?
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reciprocity
Private sells
Cheaper FFL
Speeding tickets
BenderRodriguez
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Absolutely. Skip the NICS check, ability to carry in states that recognize CHL but don't have CC yet....
JSKolache
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ogre09 said:

Any reason to renew an LTC when it comes due?
I just did. My 4th renewal - it was $40 w/ no coursework/qualification

LTC will still help speed things up at the gun counter, and per the above quick readouts, may still give priviliges in places where they don't post signs or they post incorrect signs.
DriftwoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Supposedly being signed Thursday
jrb2019
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also Campus Carry allowed with LTC but not CC
S.A. Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brad06ag said:

Brad06ag said:

DriftwoodAg said:

They mentioned a 30.05 in the debate

Based on my reading, which could be way wrong...
House version was 30.05, Senate version used 46.03.

Conference report went with Senate version.

Strike that. Senate version didn't seem to mention it. Conference report came up with the new wording.

Then again.. How all this screw ball stuff comes together needs to have a lot more clarity

Is there going to be a class we can all sign up for just to understand what we are supposed to do??
JaneDoe02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jrb2019 said:

Also Campus Carry allowed with LTC but not CC


Is this confirmed?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.