My reading is that is the list of guns explicitly exempt from the ban. I do t support the ban at all, but want to make sure we are accurate in our arguments.
Feinstein's assault ban.
6,979 Views |
59 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Coog97
Gunny456
Joined:
Jul 23, 2012
Posts:
10,371
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is just the list of guns they don't want to ban...yet. They want to ban them all. They just know they have to do it incrementally to get you to accept it. Just no. Stop accepting that any of this as "common sense". It is a violation of one of our enumerated rights and we need to stop going along with it.skeetboy3 said:
My reading is that is the list of guns explicitly exempt from the ban. I do t support the ban at all, but want to make sure we are accurate in our arguments.
State nullification.
Call Texas a 2nd Amendment sanctuary state.
Call Texas a 2nd Amendment sanctuary state.
Lol at SCOTUS or national guard saving us.
There truly is only one solution to the problem.
There truly is only one solution to the problem.
What a monumental waste of taxpayer dollars.
They evidently have been "vetting" those troops.txags92 said:It won't be enough if they pass this and start trying to confiscate things. No chance those National Guard troops fire a shot to defend a congress that passes this kind of garbage.AgBQ-00 said:
It would outlaw basically all semi auto weapons. This is exactly why they have set up a green zone defensive perimeter around themselves
I pray that people on this message board take this seriously.
There may come a time that you have to risk all of your **** to protect your beliefs. I pray you rise to the occasion and do so because me and my family are counting on it.
I will, and I believe I have found a local community that will as well, but without all of us doing so Small pockets of resistance will fail.
There may come a time that you have to risk all of your **** to protect your beliefs. I pray you rise to the occasion and do so because me and my family are counting on it.
I will, and I believe I have found a local community that will as well, but without all of us doing so Small pockets of resistance will fail.
if the line item veto was taken away from POTUS then there is precedent to do the same to Congress, strike the whole ****ing thing down...and **** the Dems while we're at it.Gunny456 said:
I highly suggest you people read the bill. They have a provision that says if one part of the bill is shut down by SCOTUS the rest of the bill will stay law and that every single point of the bill will individually have to be shut down
No way our current SC will hear all those points.
I believe some justices helped them write the bill.
Folks they are doing their best to disarm us. Better start realizing that.
NO ONE IS COMING TO YOUR DOOR TO TAKE YOUR DAMN GUNS.
this **** is being set up as a long game. This is not an overnight deal.
This has been going on for years. You keep thinking they are going to ban everything and come take your guns from your door. If crafted properly, they don't have to do either to accomplish the same goal.
I can beat a formula one race car with my F250 if I cut his fuel lines, saw holes in his tires, and feed the driver lunch from Taco Bell. I don't have to set the car one fire.
That's why "not one more inch" is so intimately crucial.
this **** is being set up as a long game. This is not an overnight deal.
This has been going on for years. You keep thinking they are going to ban everything and come take your guns from your door. If crafted properly, they don't have to do either to accomplish the same goal.
I can beat a formula one race car with my F250 if I cut his fuel lines, saw holes in his tires, and feed the driver lunch from Taco Bell. I don't have to set the car one fire.
That's why "not one more inch" is so intimately crucial.
txags92 said:That is just the list of guns they don't want to ban...yet. They want to ban them all. They just know they have to do it incrementally to get you to accept it. Just no. Stop accepting that any of this as "common sense". It is a violation of one of our enumerated rights and we need to stop going along with it.skeetboy3 said:
My reading is that is the list of guns explicitly exempt from the ban. I do t support the ban at all, but want to make sure we are accurate in our arguments.
Except they will exempt illegals from background checks. Illegals are the new liberal voter base since they are steadily losing the black vote.Gunny456 said:
Finally somebody who realizes what their goal is! Thank you.
And get ready for the next part of the plan.,., restrictions on ammo purchases and background checks to purchase ammo.
All you have to do is look at California for the future plans coming soon.
No ammo means useless guns my friends.
DVC2010 said:
Reset the clock on the firearms and ammunition shortage.
With guns and ammo flying off the shelves, do they really expect that they can disarm everyone?
A gun ban just makes the majority of Americans criminals.
And like with everything else, I am sure that they exclude themselves from the ban.
What brazosdog said. They have been playing chess on this for a long time. Chipping away at it. And we as a collective while let it continue. Honestly, it's a losing war currently. If they don't do something so bold to start a true bloody civil war, then they will accomplish their goals at some point. Just a matter of time.
That is an unbelievable bill.
The delusional and evil Outdoors Board liberals won't touch this thread with a 10 foot pole. They're too busy telling everyone on the politics board how nobody is going to take your guns.
NO AMNESTY!
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
Joined:
Oct 10, 2006
Posts:
49,082
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is known to be more than one gun per capita in circulation in the United States right now. The real number is probably closer to 2. Yes, that includes hi-points and old, poorly maintained firearms, but the citizens are armed to the teeth.River Bass said:Quote:
In places like Texas the citizens probably have more guns than law enforcement.
Probably? There are 700,000 law enforcement officers in the ENTIRE United States. Texas alone has probably 9 million gun owners.
This, by the way, is why leftists in general freaked the **** out when couple hundred unarmed yokels drunk on S'more Schnapps easily commandeered the capitol.
That bill was from 2017. Is it being brought up again for debate in the Senate now that the House passed the expanded background check bill?
The list of firearms in this bill is a "white list" which means that only things on the list are permissible. This makes it harder to get around the list by introducing new models because anything new is automatically verboten.
Interestingly, under this bill my rem 788 bolt action, rem model 25 pump rifle and J. C. Higgens pump shotgun are illegal as they are nowhere to be found on their list.
Interestingly, under this bill my rem 788 bolt action, rem model 25 pump rifle and J. C. Higgens pump shotgun are illegal as they are nowhere to be found on their list.
NO AMNESTY!
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
Well, this is on page 1 ....98Ag99Grad said:
That bill was from 2017. Is it being brought up again for debate in the Senate now that the House passed the expanded background check bill?
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act may be cited as the ''Assault Weapons Ban 5 of 2021''.
NO AMNESTY!
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
Feinstein is almost 88 years old. It is way past time to retire. She is a great example for term limits. California voters have elected her 5 times I think..... her and her anti-Christian ways which came to light when she interviewed Amy Coney Barrett. You who live in her district, please stay there and do not move to Texas.
Get a metal detector, Dianne, and go spend some time on the beach! It will be good for your health.
Get a metal detector, Dianne, and go spend some time on the beach! It will be good for your health.
rab79 said:
The list of firearms in this bill is a "white list" which means that only things on the list are permissible. This makes it harder to get around the list by introducing new models because anything new is automatically verboten.
Interestingly, under this bill my rem 788 bolt action, rem model 25 pump rifle and J. C. Higgens pump shotgun are illegal as they are nowhere to be found on their list.
So is my Sears Roebuck SxS.
Wasn't there a very recent thread on this board saying how they were coming after guns and gun rights, and the concerned outdoorsman of this board denigrated the thread and the premise of this happening....where are they now?
When it comes to immigration, "sanctuary" status has to do validating elected officials who choose to actively restrict, even ignore the enforcement of existing sovereignty laws.Central Committee said:
State nullification.
Call Texas a 2nd Amendment sanctuary state.
When it comes to gun ownership, "sanctuary" status has to do with protection from elected officials who choose to actively restrict, even ignore foundational, explicitly-stated constitutional protections for the citizenry.
Says a lot about where we find ourselves.
Featured Stories
See All
17:45
2h ago
639
The Film Room: Texas A&M 38, New Mexico State 3
by Stephen McGee
Keys to the Game: No. 23 Texas A&M vs. Southern
by Luke Evangelist
Around CFB: Army, Notre Dame meet under a blue-gray November sky
by Olin Buchanan
@coopercuffe
Can 12th Man Assoc. Revoke Student guest passes for tu?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
131
DannyDuberstein
Can 12th Man Assoc. Revoke Student guest passes for tu?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
64
BreNayPop
Can 12th Man Assoc. Revoke Student guest passes for tu?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
53
Orlando Ayala Cant Read
Can 12th Man Assoc. Revoke Student guest passes for tu?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
52
DannyDuberstein
Can 12th Man Assoc. Revoke Student guest passes for tu?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
46