Outdoors
Sponsored by

Unmanned aircraft laws in Texas (laws cited within)

6,816 Views | 66 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by CanyonAg77
mellison
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was unaware of these laws, so I thought I would share with the crowd.

In short (the way I read it), you better have a good reason to take images of someone else's land or it is a Class C Misdemeanor. Those reasons include academics, military, law enforcement, utility, emergency situations, and real estate marketing. Land within 25 miles of the border is also allowed for some reason. The law doesn't seem to make any distinction between commercial uses and hobby uses.

What are Texags' thoughts and observations on the law? Here it is:
Source: https://jrupprechtlaw.com/texas-drone-laws

Current as of June 19, 2017
Texas Government Code Chapter 423. USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT

Sec. 423.001. DEFINITION. In this chapter, "image" means any capturing of sound waves, thermal, infrared, ultraviolet, visible light, or other electromagnetic waves, odor, or other conditions existing on or about real property in this state or an individual located on that property.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 423.002. NONAPPLICABILITY.
(a) It is lawful to capture an image using an unmanned aircraft in this state:
(1) for the purpose of professional or scholarly research and development or for another academic purpose by a person acting on behalf of an institution of higher education or a private or independent institution of higher education, as those terms are defined by Section 61.003, Education Code, including a person who:
(A) is a professor, employee, or student of the institution; or
(B) is under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction or on behalf of the institution;
(2) in airspace designated as a test site or range authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration for the purpose of integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace;
(3) as part of an operation, exercise, or mission of any branch of the United States military;
(4) if the image is captured by a satellite for the purposes of mapping;
(5) if the image is captured by or for an electric or natural gas utility:
(A) for operations and maintenance of utility facilities for the purpose of maintaining utility system reliability and integrity;
(B) for inspecting utility facilities to determine repair, maintenance, or replacement needs during and after construction of such facilities;
(C) for assessing vegetation growth for the purpose of maintaining clearances on utility easements; and
(D) for utility facility routing and siting for the purpose of providing utility service;
(6) with the consent of the individual who owns or lawfully occupies the real property captured in the image;
(7) pursuant to a valid search or arrest warrant;
(8) if the image is captured by a law enforcement authority or a person who is under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction or on behalf of a law enforcement authority:
(A) in immediate pursuit of a person law enforcement officers have reasonable suspicion or probable cause to suspect has committed an offense, not including misdemeanors or offenses punishable by a fine only;
(B) for the purpose of documenting a crime scene where an offense, not including misdemeanors or offenses punishable by a fine only, has been committed;
(C) for the purpose of investigating the scene of:
(i) a human fatality;
(ii) a motor vehicle accident causing death or serious bodily injury to a person; or
(iii) any motor vehicle accident on a state highway or federal interstate or highway;
(D) in connection with the search for a missing person;
(E) for the purpose of conducting a high-risk tactical operation that poses a threat to human life; or
(F) of private property that is generally open to the public where the property owner consents to law enforcement public safety responsibilities;
(9) if the image is captured by state or local law enforcement authorities, or a person who is under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction or on behalf of state authorities, for the purpose of:
(A) surveying the scene of a catastrophe or other damage to determine whether a state of emergency should be declared;
(B) preserving public safety, protecting property, or surveying damage or contamination during a lawfully declared state of emergency; or
(C) conducting routine air quality sampling and monitoring, as provided by state or local law;
(10) at the scene of a spill, or a suspected spill, of hazardous materials;
(11) for the purpose of fire suppression;
(12) for the purpose of rescuing a person whose life or well-being is in imminent danger;
(13) if the image is captured by a Texas licensed real estate broker in connection with the marketing, sale, or financing of real property, provided that no individual is identifiable in the image;
(14) of real property or a person on real property that is within 25 miles of the United States border;
(15) from a height no more than eight feet above ground level in a public place, if the image was captured without using any electronic, mechanical, or other means to amplify the image beyond normal human perception;
(16) of public real property or a person on that property;
(17) if the image is captured by the owner or operator of an oil, gas, water, or other pipeline for the purpose of inspecting, maintaining, or repairing pipelines or other related facilities, and is captured without the intent to conduct surveillance on an individual or real property located in this state;
(18) in connection with oil pipeline safety and rig protection;
(19) in connection with port authority surveillance and security;
(20) if the image is captured by a registered professional land surveyor in connection with the practice of professional surveying, as those terms are defined by Section 1071.002, Occupations Code, provided that no individual is identifiable in the image; or
(21) if the image is captured by a professional engineer licensed under Subchapter G, Chapter 1001, Occupations Code, in connection with the practice of engineering, as defined by Section 1001.003, Occupations Code, provided that no individual is identifiable in the image.
(b) This chapter does not apply to the manufacture, assembly, distribution, or sale of an unmanned aircraft.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.
Amended by: Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 360 (H.B. 2167), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2015.

Sec. 423.003. OFFENSE: ILLEGAL USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT TO CAPTURE IMAGE.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person uses an unmanned aircraft to capture an image of an individual or privately owned real property in this state with the intent to conduct surveillance on the individual or property captured in the image.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
(c) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the person destroyed the image:
(1) as soon as the person had knowledge that the image was captured in violation of this section; and
(2) without disclosing, displaying, or distributing the image to a third party.
(d) In this section, "intent" has the meaning assigned by Section 6.03, Penal Code.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 423.004. OFFENSE: POSSESSION, DISCLOSURE, DISPLAY, DISTRIBUTION, OR USE OF IMAGE.
(a) A person commits an offense if the person:
(1) captures an image in violation of Section 423.003; and
(2) possesses, discloses, displays, distributes, or otherwise uses that image.
(b) An offense under this section for the possession of an image is a Class C misdemeanor. An offense under this section for the disclosure, display, distribution, or other use of an image is a Class B misdemeanor.
(c) Each image a person possesses, discloses, displays, distributes, or otherwise uses in violation of this section is a separate offense.
(d) It is a defense to prosecution under this section for the possession of an image that the person destroyed the image as soon as the person had knowledge that the image was captured in violation of Section 423.003.
(e) It is a defense to prosecution under this section for the disclosure, display, distribution, or other use of an image that the person stopped disclosing, displaying, distributing, or otherwise using the image as soon as the person had knowledge that the image was captured in violation of Section 423.003.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 423.0045. OFFENSE: OPERATION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT OVER CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY.
(a) In this section:
(1) "Critical infrastructure facility" means:
(A) one of the following, if completely enclosed by a fence or other physical barrier that is obviously designed to exclude intruders, or if clearly marked with a sign or signs that are posted on the property, are reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders, and indicate that entry is forbidden:
(i) a petroleum or alumina refinery;
(ii) an electrical power generating facility, substation, switching station, or electrical control center;
(iii) a chemical, polymer, or rubber manufacturing facility;
(iv) a water intake structure, water treatment facility, wastewater treatment plant, or pump station;
(v) a natural gas compressor station;
(vi) a liquid natural gas terminal or storage facility;
(vii) a telecommunications central switching office or any structure used as part of a system to provide wired or wireless telecommunications services;
(viii) a port, railroad switching yard, trucking terminal, or other freight transportation facility;
(ix) a gas processing plant, including a plant used in the processing, treatment, or fractionation of natural gas;
(x) a transmission facility used by a federally licensed radio or television station;
(xi) a steelmaking facility that uses an electric arc furnace to make steel; or
(xii) a dam that is classified as a high hazard by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; or
(xiii) a concentrated animal feeding operation, as defined by Section 26.048, Water Code; or
(B) if enclosed by a fence or other physical barrier obviously designed to exclude intruders:
(i) any portion of an aboveground oil, gas, or chemical pipeline;
(ii) an oil or gas drilling site;
(iii) a group of tanks used to store crude oil, such as a tank battery;
(iv) an oil, gas, or chemical production facility;
(v) an oil or gas wellhead; or
(vi) any oil and gas facility that has an active flare
(2) "Dam" means any barrier, including any appurtenant structures, that is constructed for the purpose of permanently or temporarily impounding water.
(b) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally or knowingly:
(1) operates an unmanned aircraft over a critical infrastructure facility and the unmanned aircraft is not higher than 400 feet above ground level;
(2) allows an unmanned aircraft to make contact with a critical infrastructure facility, including any person or object on the premises of or within the facility; or
(3) allows an unmanned aircraft to come within a distance of a critical infrastructure facility that is close enough to interfere with the operations of or cause a disturbance to the facility.
(c) This section does not apply to conduct described by Subsection (b) that is committed by:
(1) the federal government, the state, or a governmental entity;
(2) a person under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction or on behalf of the federal government, the state, or a governmental entity;
(3) a law enforcement agency;
(4) a person under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction or on behalf of a law enforcement agency;
(5) an owner or operator of the critical infrastructure facility;
(6) a person under contract with or otherwise acting under the direction or on behalf of an owner or operator of the critical infrastructure facility;
(7) a person who has the prior written consent of the owner or operator of the critical infrastructure facility;
(8) the owner or occupant of the property on which the critical infrastructure facility is located or a person who has the prior written consent of the owner or occupant of that property; or
(9) an operator of an unmanned aircraft that is being used for a commercial purpose, if the operation is conducted in compliance with:
(A) each applicable Federal Aviation Administration rule, restriction, or exemption; and
(B) all required Federal Aviation Administration authorizations
(d) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if the actor has previously been convicted under this section.
Added by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1033 (H.B. 1481), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2015.

Sec. 423.005. ILLEGALLY OR INCIDENTALLY CAPTURED IMAGES NOT SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE.
(a) Except as otherwise provided by Subsection (b), an image captured in violation of Section 423.003, or an image captured by an unmanned aircraft that was incidental to the lawful capturing of an image:
(1) may not be used as evidence in any criminal or juvenile proceeding, civil action, or administrative proceeding;
(2) is not subject to disclosure, inspection, or copying under Chapter 552; and
(3) is not subject to discovery, subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for its release.
(b) An image described by Subsection (a) may be disclosed and used as evidence to prove a violation of this chapter and is subject to discovery, subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for that purpose.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 423.006. CIVIL ACTION.
(a) An owner or tenant of privately owned real property located in this state may bring against a person who, in violation of Section 423.003, captured an image of the property or the owner or tenant while on the property an action to:
(1) enjoin a violation or imminent violation of Section 423.003 or 423.004;
(2) recover a civil penalty of:
(A) $5,000 for all images captured in a single episode in violation of Section 423.003; or
(B) $10,000 for disclosure, display, distribution, or other use of any images captured in a single episode in violation of Section 423.004; or
(3) recover actual damages if the person who captured the image in violation of Section 423.003 discloses, displays, or distributes the image with malice.
(b) For purposes of recovering the civil penalty or actual damages under Subsection (a), all owners of a parcel of real property are considered to be a single owner and all tenants of a parcel of real property are considered to be a single tenant.
(c) In this section, "malice" has the meaning assigned by Section 41.001, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
(d) In addition to any civil penalties authorized under this section, the court shall award court costs and reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party.
(e) Venue for an action under this section is governed by Chapter 15, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
(f) An action brought under this section must be commenced within two years from the date the image was:
(1) captured in violation of Section 423.003; or
(2) initially disclosed, displayed, distributed, or otherwise used in violation of Section 423.004.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 423.007. RULES FOR USE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT.
The Department of Public Safety shall adopt rules and guidelines for use of an unmanned aircraft by a law enforcement authority in this state.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.

Sec. 423.008. REPORTING BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY.
(a) Not earlier than January 1 and not later than January 15 of each odd-numbered year, each state law enforcement agency and each county or municipal law enforcement agency located in a county or municipality, as applicable, with a population greater than 150,000, that used or operated an unmanned aircraft during the preceding 24 months shall issue a written report to the governor, the lieutenant governor, and each member of the legislature and shall:
(1) retain the report for public viewing; and
(2) post the report on the law enforcement agency's publicly accessible website, if one exists.
(b) The report must include:
(1) the number of times an unmanned aircraft was used, organized by date, time, location, and the types of incidents and types of justification for the use;
(2) the number of criminal investigations aided by the use of an unmanned aircraft and a description of how the unmanned aircraft aided each investigation;
(3) the number of times an unmanned aircraft was used for a law enforcement operation other than a criminal investigation, the dates and locations of those operations, and a description of how the unmanned aircraft aided each operation;
(4) the type of information collected on an individual, residence, property, or area that was not the subject of a law enforcement operation and the frequency of the collection of this information; and
(5) the total cost of acquiring, maintaining, repairing, and operating or otherwise using each unmanned aircraft for the preceding 24 months.
Added by Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1390 (H.B. 912), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2013.
Sec. 423.009. REGULATION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION.
(a) In this section:
(1) "Political subdivision" includes a county, a joint board created under Section 22.074, Transportation Code, and a municipality.
(2) "Special event" means a festival, celebration, or other gathering that:
(A) involves:
(i) the reservation and temporary use of all or a portion of a public park, road, or other property of a political subdivision; and
(ii) entertainment, the sale of merchandise, food, or beverages, or mass participation in a sports event; and
(B) requires a significant use or coordination of a political subdivision's services.
(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a political subdivision may not adopt or enforce any ordinance, order, or other similar measure regarding the operation of an unmanned aircraft.
(c) A political subdivision may adopt and enforce an ordinance, order, or other similar measure regarding:
(1) the use of an unmanned aircraft during a special event;
(2) the political subdivision's use of an unmanned aircraft; or
(3) the use of an unmanned aircraft near a facility or infrastructure owned by the political subdivision, if the political subdivision:
(A) applies for and receives authorization from the Federal Aviation Administration to adopt the regulation; and
(B) after providing reasonable notice, holds a public hearing on the political subdivision's intent to apply for the authorization.
(d) An ordinance, order, or other similar measure that violates Subsection (b) is void and unenforceable.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As I understand it, you cannot surveil someone else or their property without permission, but you can incidentally capture it. It's the same thing as capturing other people in the background of your photo, but not being able to surveil them and record their every movement (stalking).

Personally, I don't see why this law exists other than for feels and the reactionary crowd. I also don't agree with its constitutionality. If I want to take pictures of something or someone from a public places, whether be in the air or on the ground, I should be able to. Freedom of speech and whatnot.
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gov. Abbott signed SB840 which modifies this in several ways. Probably most significant is Sec. a (21) (B). Which basically says you can do whatever the FAA says you can do. That's my interpretation, I'm not an attorney.

eta, this takes effect Sept. 1, 2017.
scottimus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is interesting.

Especially, when applied to Ag.
Suppose I was an idiot. Suppose I was a member of congress. But, I repeat myself.
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
scottimus said:

This is interesting.

Especially, when applied to Ag.

How so?
Bradley.Kohr.II
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Freedom o the air was a taking from traditional property rights to permit aviation.

While I understand the need to traverse an airspace, I strongly disagree with the idea that you should be able to snoop over anyone's property you feel like

Mostly, the advocates of that seem to be perverts/snoops/those seeking to steal trade secrets.

If a man wants privacy on his own property, he should not have to be under a roof
DayAg!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Like I said before, inadvertently traveling across my property on your way to somewhere else doesn't bother me. It's when you blatantly stop over my property while I'm having a BBQ or my kids are out by the pool is not gonna fly with me. There are a lot of not so well meaning people in this world who need little excuse to come snoop or try to perv someone's kids, or wife. Those are the kind of people that are trying to skirt the law. And their aircraft needs to be shotgunned to the ground. I have little sympathy for them or their equipment. I don't know if there had been a precedent set by a judge yet, but it needs to be. So this crap can get nipped in the bud.
JAW3336
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Unless they are flying less than 30 feet above you they aren't going to see anything in detail on their cameras. Don't be so paranoid.
redass1876
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can outfit these with plenty of different cameras. There is no 30' thing
JAW3336
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't say there is a 30' thing. Gopros and similar cameras, which are the most common ones used, won't show much detail when the drone is high up.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JAW3336 said:

I didn't say there is a 30' thing. Gopros and similar cameras, which are the most common ones used, won't show much detail when the drone is high up.


Then there wouldn't be a reason to hover over private property, right?
FSGuide
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

it's the same thing as capturing other people in the background of your photo, but not being able to surveil them and record their every movement (stalking).


Surveilling someone and recording their every move and stalking are not the same thing. For it to fit the definition of stalking in Texas the person has to fear for their safety and/or life. At least that is the explanation the judge gave when he threw out a lawsuit against the pi company I worked for a few years ago.
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So does this mean the appraisal district cannot take photos? Or use satellite imagery (since it's not used for mapping)?
txyaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 said:

JAW3336 said:

I didn't say there is a 30' thing. Gopros and similar cameras, which are the most common ones used, won't show much detail when the drone is high up.


Then there wouldn't be a reason to hover over private property, right?
Sure there is. I can get over a mile distance from my drone. If I'm filming the highway, rivers, or the country side, I might be hovered over someone's property at 100'-400' altitude with the camera pointed at the horizon. Unless you're at 20-30', the camera really has poor definition of humans.

This was at 300' with a 4K camera. I would have no idea if someone was naked in the back yard of the house.



This is at <100' with a 4K camera. It would be hard to tell genders from the blobs of humans

AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txyaloo said:

AgLA06 said:

JAW3336 said:

I didn't say there is a 30' thing. Gopros and similar cameras, which are the most common ones used, won't show much detail when the drone is high up.


Then there wouldn't be a reason to hover over private property, right?
Sure there is. I can get over a mile distance from my drone. If I'm filming the highway, rivers, or the country side, I might be hovered over someone's property at 100'-400' altitude with the camera pointed at the horizon. Unless you're at 20-30', the camera really has poor definition of humans.

This was at 300' with a 4K camera. I would have no idea if someone was naked in the back yard of the house.



This is at <100' with a 4K camera. It would be hard to tell genders from the blobs of humans




That's not in a neighborhood, Which is where most of the issues are taking place. Additionally, why would you be reconning on private property that isn't yours and you don't have permission?
txyaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 said:

txyaloo said:

AgLA06 said:

JAW3336 said:

I didn't say there is a 30' thing. Gopros and similar cameras, which are the most common ones used, won't show much detail when the drone is high up.


Then there wouldn't be a reason to hover over private property, right?
Sure there is. I can get over a mile distance from my drone. If I'm filming the highway, rivers, or the country side, I might be hovered over someone's property at 100'-400' altitude with the camera pointed at the horizon. Unless you're at 20-30', the camera really has poor definition of humans.

This was at 300' with a 4K camera. I would have no idea if someone was naked in the back yard of the house.



This is at <100' with a 4K camera. It would be hard to tell genders from the blobs of humans




That's not in a neighborhood, Which is where most of the issues are taking place. Additionally, why would you be reconning on private property that isn't yours and you don't have permission?
While it may not be in a neighborhood, the resolution of the camera doesn't change. I agree - hovering a drone with a camera in a neighborhood at <100' could be creepy. That doesn't change the fact that the consumer cameras don't have high enough resolution to pose any potential privacy issues.

What do you consider "reconning"? How is flying a drone at 400' and different than flying a helicopter or airplane at 400'? I frequently see people flying airplanes low over our ranch. They're flying low enough to take detailed pictures. Shouldn't that also be illegal? I'd love to fire some shots at them - they have no reason to be flying that low over our property - but I never have.
JAW3336
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In order to get my entire backyard in a shot I have to be over a neighbors property.
GunRangeGal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have that typical pot-stirrer in our neighborhood that likes to hover his drone right outside/off your property. When people started to complain on our neighborhood FB page, he ranted on and on about personal rights and freedoms... apparently he was following the letter of the law, as I understood it. One neighbor called the cops because he saw the drone hovering while his young daughter was having a pool party with her friends. I've also seen the owner get upset that his drone went down in a backyard and the homeowner didn't immediately grant him access to retrieve his toy. The guy is a class-A jerk.

I'm all about personal freedoms, but I'm also all about my privacy. I don't mind when an airplane flies over me... but when the neighborhood ******* decides to attach a camera to a drone and fly it over my backyard when I'm hanging out with the dogs or gardening, then I have a problem.
mellison
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This whole topic presents interesting issues that are difficult to solve, e.g. Freedom vs Privacy. I fly a drone on occasion for my own amusement. I just enjoy seeing things from a different perspective sometimes. I also have a license to do it commercially but don't really intend to ever do that. Many people have a negative reaction to seeing someone that is operating a drone. I do my best to educate people and explain to them what I'm doing and what the capabilities are.

Like your experience with a strange neighbor, there can be problems even when the laws are followed. In other situations, someone's good intent can easily be misunderstood.

The number one issue is safety. The small consumer drones aren't built to be serviced and will all eventually fall out of the sky some day. FAA says you can't fly one over a crowd of people for that very reason. I'm sure there will be more restrictions on personal drones in the future, especially when commercial use picks up.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Privacy is the ultimate freedom. Ultimately there can Be no other real freedom without it. What are the rules on dropping a drone filming you? Or drone operator?
ursusguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And for the love of God, keep them away from wildfires.
DayAg!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

Unless they are flying less than 30 feet above you they aren't going to see anything in detail on their cameras. Don't be so paranoid.
That guy is only taking pictures of the kids at the playground for some type of add magazine dont be so paranoid.

Whats funny is, it seems people like you are why our country is going to hell in a hand basket because you cant see past your nose to understand whats happening. Is drone behavior gonna end the world tomorrow? No, but one thing always leads to another until it's too late. Study Nazi Germany and see how gradually they were led to slaughter over time as their individual freedom was eliminated on step at a time.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A drone thread Godwined. That has to be a first.
Ag_of_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Odd, I don't see privacy listed in our constitution.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's because people then were smart enough to understand it, and no one alive then ever DREAMED that morons in the future couldn't figure it out. Privacy and free travel were so basic they didn't need To be mentioned at all.

Only centuries of socialist authoritarian brainwashing created people stupid, weak and gullible enough to let those basic rights get trashed.
JAW3336
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You are the one trying to eliminate a freedom, not me.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JAW3336 said:

You are the one trying to eliminate a freedom, not me.


Your want to have fun does not supercede private property rights.

You could go back to video games.
JAW3336
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do private property rights extend to airspace?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JAW3336 said:

Do private property rights extend to airspace?


Considering vertical easements supercede private property rights and especially flying (and most neighborhoods have them) it's a moot point.

However, if you want to abide with all other airspace platform requirements to file public flight path logs so a private resident knows who the perv hovering over their house is, by all means ask the FAA to make all things square.

However, jokers like you only seem to expect all the same abilities as helicopters and planes and disregard the corresponding minimum altitude requirements without having to jump through the same hoops and responsibilities (liability).
JAW3336
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is someone flying a drone over your backyard any different than just looking at your backyard across a fence line?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JAW3336 said:

How is someone flying a drone over your backyard any different than just looking at your backyard across a fence line?


It's not. That's the point.

"Under Florida law this falls under invasion of privacy or the peeping Tom law. The statute reads the following;

A person commits the crime of voyeurism if, for the purpose

of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, he

or he/she knowingly views, photographs, or films another person,

without that person's knowledge and consent, while the person

being viewed, photographed, or filmed is in a place where

he or she would have a reasonable expectation of privacy.


You can file charges against him, these are very serious charges, if he is convicted he might be ordered to register as a sex offender."

Any more laws you want to violate?
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JAW3336 said:

How is someone flying a drone over your backyard any different than just looking at your backyard across a fence line?

It isn't any different as long as you stick to subsection (15) quoted in the OP. But that's not what a bunch of creepers are doing by actually flying over and looking down at people's private property.
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL at Florida law quotes in a Texas law thread.

But we probably have the same thing, ish.
JAW3336
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
so my neighbor is breaking the law when they look into my backyard?
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JAW3336 said:

so my neighbor is breaking the law when they look into my backyard?


What? You're not ok with it!?!?

No way?!?
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.