I don't even want to turn on a sports talk show. I'm sure the Cowboys are the getting laughed at on every platform/show this morning.
Most likely Dak gets a 2 year extension to spread out the cap hit and they seriously consider drafting a developmental QB to sit behind him for a year or twoMacarthur said:
I haven't studied the cap situation but it seems to me that teams all over the league get out of cap hell often. Unless someone corrects me with some data, I'm not going to buy cap hell as a reason to not move forward. Obviously, the biggest issue is Dak and what to do. I want to hold off until the anger goes away before I make too many comments about Dak.
Just because they are both former TEs? Dan Campbell has been in coaching in the NFL since 2010 and clearly had made a name for himself in those circles. Best I can tell Witten has been coaching high school for a few years to spend more time with his kids.duck79 said:
With the success of Dan Campbell, I guarantee you that Jerry will push to interview Witten.
Macarthur said:
I haven't studied the cap situation but it seems to me that teams all over the league get out of cap hell often. Unless someone corrects me with some data, I'm not going to buy cap hell as a reason to not move forward. Obviously, the biggest issue is Dak and what to do. I want to hold off until the anger goes away before I make too many comments about Dak.
Macarthur said:
Didn't Philly go to the SB the very next year after eating Wentz cap money?
Macarthur said:
Didn't Philly go to the SB the very next year after eating Wentz cap money?
Woods Ag said:
Remember Johnny in his last game against Duke? (I believe it was Duke). When the camera caught him raving on the sidelines to get him the ball back. Just get him the ****in ball back and we were going to go win this thing. You have to have that.
Johnny ain't a NFL QB, but he had that. And that is what it takes to win.
Joe Burrow is that dude, Patrick Mahomes is that dude. Brees, Manning, Brady... Even Jalen Hurts has some of that in him. It's why the stories of him from the first day he stepped into the Eagles facilities were "this dude is different. He has a long way to go but if there was ever a dude that was gonna figure it out, it's him."
Even Baker Mayfield is that dude. He lacks the talent, but damnit he ain't going to stop swinging until you cut his arms off, stick a stake up his ass and start roasting him on a fire. All you hear from Cleveland and TB is how much his teammates love him.
Dak may try to be, but he goes out there and throws a bad pick when we need him to execute on that drive more than any other drive. You cant throw that pick. You have to score a touchdown and then you have to be on the sideline telling your defense that if they do their damn jobs we're going to win this game.
Edit: That's my last Dak comment. Sorry. I was watching old highlights earlier and it upset me again. I'm on to 2024 starting now.
jr15aggie said:Macarthur said:
Didn't Philly go to the SB the very next year after eating Wentz cap money?
Not sure what year it was... but yeah, it can be done when you have another good QB playing under a 2nd round rookie contract. They still had a huge amount of cap dedicated to a Vet QB, they just got fortunate how quickly Hurts developed and they had good coaches that knew exactly what they were doing.
We could do the exact same thing here if Jerry would be a real GM. Fire the coaching staff and trade Micah for the #1 pick and draft a QB. Either trade Dak or let his contract expire (either way we'll have dead cap money to deal with). We still have a good enough core of players to get it done with a young QB if we get the right coaches.
Quote:
I think dumping Dak is kinda unrealistic at this point.
Especially since we would probably not be able to get the return on the trade required to actually trade him, at this point.BMX Bandit said:Quote:
I think dumping Dak is kinda unrealistic at this point.
He should only be evaluated by the 1st halfWoods Ag said:
I felt the same way.
- That 1st pick was a great play by Alexander. That's why you don't throw at him. Not when the matchup is Cooks/Alexander
- CD should have caught 2 balls including that one over the middle that he dropped. Not on Dak
- The 2nd interception was classic Dak Prescott. And there were 2 others that he threw (1 in the endzone) that hit the guy in the chest and they dropped it.
All of his stats came when they backed off and were playing zone and Dak started finding holes underneath. If they continued to play the defense they started with Dak would have been fired this morning.
Orlando Ayala Cant Read said:
I think dumping Dak is kinda unrealistic at this point.
As bad as he's been in the post seasons, and as much doubt as many of us have about him, I'm still not ready to say "he absolutely can't" win us a championship .
I do however think this team has a very serious culture problem at the top and they need to bring someone in that is very hard nosed. Not sure who that would be but I don't believe McCarthy is that guy.
Also, they need a formidable presence in both the interior DL and at LB.
AustinCountyAg said:you're vastly over crediting Dak and what the league thinks of him. He's average at best and his career has shown that.Infection_Ag11 said:ramblin_ag02 said:
I disagree. The cap era is about boom and bust. Look at the 49ers, lions, Eagles or even the Texans. Ride the wave up, blow up the team, and start over. The HOF QBs like Mahomes and Brady are the exceptions. Every other teams shines and then collapses, and the well run teams rise from the ashes. Problem is that Dak is not a HOF Qb, and Jerry will never tank
But most teams that ride the wave up never actually win a title. And the ones that do often sit in place for years before breaking through.
And no GM ever willingly tanks unless they are taking over at the start of a rebuild. No GM has EVER traded or cut a QB of Dak's caliber at this stage of their career absent significant non-football related factors, like Watson or Rodgers. The closest case is the Lions with Stafford, and he wasn't at the peak of his Lion's tenure AND they got a king's ransom for him.
Which is why there is a possibility to potentially get a lot of trade value from him, I dont see us just 'cutting him' as somethign that would ever happen or really make any sense.Infection_Ag11 said:AustinCountyAg said:you're vastly over crediting Dak and what the league thinks of him. He's average at best and his career has shown that.Infection_Ag11 said:ramblin_ag02 said:
I disagree. The cap era is about boom and bust. Look at the 49ers, lions, Eagles or even the Texans. Ride the wave up, blow up the team, and start over. The HOF QBs like Mahomes and Brady are the exceptions. Every other teams shines and then collapses, and the well run teams rise from the ashes. Problem is that Dak is not a HOF Qb, and Jerry will never tank
But most teams that ride the wave up never actually win a title. And the ones that do often sit in place for years before breaking through.
And no GM ever willingly tanks unless they are taking over at the start of a rebuild. No GM has EVER traded or cut a QB of Dak's caliber at this stage of their career absent significant non-football related factors, like Watson or Rodgers. The closest case is the Lions with Stafford, and he wasn't at the peak of his Lion's tenure AND they got a king's ransom for him.
If you cut Dak he'd sign the largest FA contract in history with a team that believe they are a QB away in approximately 12 minutes. That's just the nature of the position in modern football.
There are franchises in this league that haven't had a QB of Prescott's caliber in the entire Super Bowl era.
Tksymm7 said:
Wait a year, then don't resign him. Boom. Problem solved.