Tyler Boyd making plays
That right there Jim is the only way I can talk right there Jim.MookieBlaylock said:DannyDuberstein said:
Tony running up a pretty good "Jim" count today, as usual. Dude averages more than 1 "Jim" per game minute.
Danny that is the only way I can talk Danny
chefs were up 21-10 at halftime last year at this timeKashchei said:
This is becoming another dud game
it's been a very non-competitive almost boring playoff season (outside of the AFC wildcard games the first weekend)Kashchei said:
This is becoming another dud game
Spoke too soon.Kashchei said:
This is becoming another dud game
DannyDuberstein said:
So the question is that he reached out across the line, but he also intentionally pulled it back to keep from fumbling. It's not a goal-line.
That was my interpretation. Unless it's at the goal line, the ball is spotted where it was when the runner went down, not where he stuck the ball out a couple of seconds before.DannyDuberstein said:
So the question is that he reached out across the line, but he also intentionally pulled it back to keep from fumbling. It's not a goal-line so you in theory could sat he surrendered that portion of forward progress
And Steratore had nothing to say about it. The rules expert guys rarely have anything useful to add.DannyDuberstein said:
So the question is that he reached out across the line, but he also intentionally pulled it back to keep from fumbling. It's not a goal-line so you in theory could say he surrendered that portion of forward progress
they know they screwed upSeven Costanza said:And Steratore had nothing to say about it. The rules expert guys rarely have anything useful to add.DannyDuberstein said:
So the question is that he reached out across the line, but he also intentionally pulled it back to keep from fumbling. It's not a goal-line so you in theory could say he surrendered that portion of forward progress
Seven Costanza said:And Steratore had nothing to say about it. The rules expert guys rarely have anything useful to add.DannyDuberstein said:
So the question is that he reached out across the line, but he also intentionally pulled it back to keep from fumbling. It's not a goal-line so you in theory could say he surrendered that portion of forward progress
These talking heads are getting paid for their so-called "knowledge" of the game, but they don't seem to watching the same game we are half the time.Seven Costanza said:And Steratore had nothing to say about it. The rules expert guys rarely have anything useful to add.DannyDuberstein said:
So the question is that he reached out across the line, but he also intentionally pulled it back to keep from fumbling. It's not a goal-line so you in theory could say he surrendered that portion of forward progress
MookieBlaylock said:
Wow
That was worser than the5th string QB for the ers