Paxton vs Talarico

367,319 Views | 4070 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Science Denier
Ryan the Temp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2040huck said:

schmellba99 said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

2040huck said:

Science Denier said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

agent-maroon said:

YouBet said:

Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.

Quote:

"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.



His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.

Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.

now do paxton


Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.

except for the fraud repayments he made

Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.

No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.

Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.

That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap

I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.

Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?

One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.

The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.

One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.

Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.

Sometimes a candidate or officeholder is so bad you have to vote for someone who might not align 100% with your core policy values. (see also: Black Girl Tragic, Lina Hidalgo, etc.)
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Someone with photoshop skills should go to work and "glock" up this picture.

oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ryan the Temp said:

2040huck said:

schmellba99 said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

2040huck said:

Science Denier said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

agent-maroon said:

YouBet said:

Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.

Quote:

"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.



His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.

Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.

now do paxton


Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.

except for the fraud repayments he made

Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.

No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.

Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.

That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap

I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.

Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?

One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.

The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.

One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.

Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.

Sometimes a candidate or officeholder is so bad you have to vote for someone who might not align 100% with your core policy values. (see also: Black Girl Tragic, Lina Hidalgo, etc.)

Are you implying Talarico is good people?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
we've got a seminarian/ reverend / preacher saying it's okay to crush your baby's skull because Mary had a choice to terminate Jesus and the communist voters are coming on here saying "you F16 posters would vote for Satan if they had an R" because Paxton is getting divorced.
Ryan the Temp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm replying to the comment in the general sense, but if we're talking solely about who is a good person, I think he's probably a better person than Ken Paxton, regardless of their respective policy positions. Nonetheless, I don't think being a good person should be the sole deciding factor in any election. I've known good people who shouldn't get within 1,000 miles of holding elective office.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ryan the Temp said:

I'm replying to the comment in the general sense, but if we're talking solely about who is a good person, I think he's probably a better person than Ken Paxton, regardless of their respective policy positions. Nonetheless, I don't think being a good person should be the sole deciding factor in any election. I've known good people who shouldn't get within 1,000 miles of holding elective office.


I would take a philandering politician with good policy over a nobody charlatan willing to mutilate children any day of the week.
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2040huck said:

Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.

That's dumb. Vote for the person whose policy most closely matches your own. For me, that will not and never will be Talarico.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That eliminates degenerate Talarico.
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

we've got a seminarian/ reverend / preacher saying it's okay to crush your baby's skull because Mary had a choice to terminate Jesus and the communist voters are coming on here saying "you F16 posters would vote for Satan if they had an R" because Paxton is getting divorced.


That's stretching it a bit. I'd probably vote for Judas if he lowered taxes and took suppressors off the NFA though.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
all the Marxist tactics from the socialist regime are designed to destroy this country.

- St. Floyd riots / defund the police - marxist tactics to create division, anarchy and chaos, because a divided population is easier to control
- DEI / equity of outcomes / reparations racism /being white is spreading a disease - marxist tactics to divide that are overtly communist
- redistribution of wealth / tax the rich (aka the 50% who still work and pay taxes)/ make "them" pay their "fair share" - express requirement for socialist revolution and socialism is a precursor for communism
- trillions of gov spending on green stuff / climate alarmism - intentional unsupportable government growth is a draw to communism
- open borders / mass unfettered migration from the third world for free stuff - importing future gov-dependent voters is marxist tactic to vote ourselves into socialism

These are all things Talarco supports or has supported out loud.

Do not vote for a communist/socialist political candidate because you've been fooled into thinking they are a "good person" or been fooled into thinking the non-communist choice is the evil one.

Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A beater person when he thinks God is binary and hates Christianity and thinks slicing boobs and genitals off kids and chemically changing them is ok? Really!
Ridgeback85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Still looking forward to seeing his mythical girlfriend he's dated for "years". Standing by on that. Any day now we will see pics of her or someone in his family or friends circle will confirm she's real. Any.day.now.

Is her name Lennay Kekua? I think I have heard of her.
Ridgeback85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Slicer97 said:

oh no said:

we've got a seminarian/ reverend / preacher saying it's okay to crush your baby's skull because Mary had a choice to terminate Jesus and the communist voters are coming on here saying "you F16 posters would vote for Satan if they had an R" because Paxton is getting divorced.


That's stretching it a bit. I'd probably vote for Judas if he lowered taxes and took suppressors off the NFA though.

Those are definitely two things I am looking for in a candidate. He also needs to take SBR's off the NFA. That is the most incomprehensible law ever. I have never heard a leak proof reason for regulating SBR's. That don't make no sense.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2040huck said:

schmellba99 said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

2040huck said:

Science Denier said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

agent-maroon said:

YouBet said:

Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.

Quote:

"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.



His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.

Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.

now do paxton


Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.

except for the fraud repayments he made

Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.

No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.

Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.

That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap

I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.

Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?

One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.

The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.

One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.

Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.

It is impossible to be a Democrat and be a good person. Working to advance the Democrat agenda is enough to make you a sleazeball.
NASAg03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggieforester05 said:

2040huck said:

schmellba99 said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

2040huck said:

Science Denier said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

agent-maroon said:

YouBet said:

Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.

Quote:

"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.



His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.

Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.

now do paxton


Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.

except for the fraud repayments he made

Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.

No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.

Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.

That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap

I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.

Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?

One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.

The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.

One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.

Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.

It is impossible to be a Democrat and be a good person. Working to advance the Democrat agenda is enough to make you a sleazeball.

unfortunately, many of our friends with a uterus fall for the "compassion" lies - as if forced extraction from the productive people by government is going to feed and shelter everyone and we'll all be so much happier with an all powerful benevolent government solving every problem for everyone and productivity and competition won't go away, nor will motivation or innovation. Their daddy Karl designed the system to fool people and it works.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NASAg03 said:



communist makes even more communist statements. /you don't say?.gif


...but did you hear? Paxton's divorce is not finalized and he went on vacation with his girlfriend. We have to vote for complete economic destruction and a communist takeover in the US Senate now, right?
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ridgeback85 said:

I have never heard a leak proof reason for regulating SBR's.


That's because there's not one. It's like trying to come up with a good reason to vote (D).
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NASAg03 said:



He knows his audience, and the idiots in the 40 and under crowd will believe every word of it.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NASAg03 said:




Said by a "guy" who has never created anything of value in his entire life.
chap
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Odd detail in new Talarico ad. He drives a Chevy Colorado, which has appeared in other ads and in profiles.

But here he's driving a Dodge Ram 1500. And it's not hard to spot; you can see the plate, which is linked to an Enterprise rental.

Was his car in the shop or something? idk, asked and didn't hear back
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NASAg03 said:



"...stealing the wealth we all created."



Yeah right.

That little communist hasn't created anything but more intrusive government.
12thMan9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chap said:



Odd detail in new Talarico ad. He drives a Chevy Colorado, which has appeared in other ads and in profiles.

But here he's driving a Dodge Ram 1500. And it's not hard to spot; you can see the plate, which is linked to an Enterprise rental.

Was his car in the shop or something? idk, asked and didn't hear back


No. It was his mom's turn to drive it.
Ronnie '88
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ryan the Temp said:

Gigem314 said:

Im Gipper said:



The Paxton campaign seriously needs to make a "This Christmas..." campaign ad with this.

The Talarico campaign needs to make a campaign ad with Trump at the WHCD saying how Talarico's platform is quite good.

As if his base wasn't angry enough, that would put them over the top.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NASAg03 said:



Do all of those campaign donations he and the party are grifting from out of state count as theft as well?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chap said:


Odd detail in new Talarico ad. He drives a Chevy Colorado, which has appeared in other ads and in profiles.

But here he's driving a Dodge Ram 1500. And it's not hard to spot; you can see the plate, which is linked to an Enterprise rental.

Was his car in the shop or something? idk, asked and didn't hear back
that's odd. he usually seems so authentic and genuine and relatable.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

2040huck said:

Science Denier said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

agent-maroon said:

YouBet said:

Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.

Quote:

"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.



His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.

Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.

now do paxton


Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.

except for the fraud repayments he made

Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.

No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.

Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.

That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap

I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.

Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?

One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.

The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.

One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.


Funny how a guy who had an extra marital affair is the lowest of the low, yet they all whistle past the graveyard while numerous candidates who have been pictured entertaining terrorist sympathizers are getting elected to government positions within their party. What a wild time to be alive.
VP at Pierce and Pierce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has Talarico ever had a job? And why do Dems always get these people who have never had a real job? Obama and Beto had never had real jobs.
coolerguy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem314 said:

NASAg03 said:



Do all of those campaign donations he and the party are grifting from out of state count as theft as well?


I would love for this guy to name any piece of wealth he has created in his life. The dude is a professional moocher. Hasn't created anything and won't ever create anything.

Thanks goodness for the evil corporation I work for. They allow me to build things that I could never dream of funding and building on my own. Get to make a real difference in the world and they pay me handsomely to do it.
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

aggieforester05 said:

2040huck said:

schmellba99 said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

2040huck said:

Science Denier said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

agent-maroon said:

YouBet said:

Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.

Quote:

"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.



His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.

Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.

now do paxton


Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.

except for the fraud repayments he made

Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.

No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.

Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.

That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap

I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.

Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?

One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.

The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.

One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.

Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.

It is impossible to be a Democrat and be a good person. Working to advance the Democrat agenda is enough to make you a sleazeball.

unfortunately, many of our friends with a uterus fall for the "compassion" lies - as if forced extraction from the productive people by government is going to feed and shelter everyone and we'll all be so much happier with an all powerful benevolent government solving every problem for everyone and productivity and competition won't go away, nor will motivation or innovation. Their daddy Karl designed the system to fool people and it works.

Many Democrat voters are good people and well intentioned, they are just severely misguided idiots. I was speaking specifically about Democrat politicians. If you're a Democrat politician, there are no excuses, you're a gigantic POS for knowingly pushing that anti American BS.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:

Has Talarico ever had a job? And why do Dems always get these people who have never had a real job? Obama and Beto had never had real jobs.
yes. He was a creepy teacher and then he was an "equity consultant" for an NGO that wants to defund the police. That plus skipping hundreds of votes in the state house makes him entirely qualified to help destroy America as a communist US Senator.
Old Gorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gigem314 said:

Im Gipper said:



The Paxton campaign seriously needs to make a "This Christmas..." campaign ad with this.


He was probably disappointed not to get an anatomically correct Fauci doll with all six gender variations.

This guy is all government all the time: a pure statist who will take your income as he enhances his own.
2040huck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggieforester05 said:

2040huck said:

schmellba99 said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

2040huck said:

Science Denier said:

2040huck said:

Urban Ag said:

agent-maroon said:

YouBet said:

Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.

Quote:

"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.



His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.

Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.

now do paxton


Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.

except for the fraud repayments he made

Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.

No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.

Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.

That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap

I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.

Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?

One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.

The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.

One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.

Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.

It is impossible to be a Democrat and be a good person. Working to advance the Democrat agenda is enough to make you a sleazeball.

Fine. Vote for the guy who admitted defrauding people
Hardcore Greg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

we've got a seminarian/ reverend / preacher saying it's okay to crush your baby's skull because Mary had a choice to terminate Jesus and the communist voters are coming on here saying "you F16 posters would vote for Satan if they had an R" because Paxton is getting divorced.


Yep...he wants the pen*ses of clinically insane cross dressing males in our daughters locker rooms and the breasts removed from confused and troubled 13 y/o girls...but Ken Paxton made a few mistakes in life.

Can't reason with these people. They are borderline demonic.
First Page Last Page
Page 80 of 117
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.