2040huck said:schmellba99 said:2040huck said:Urban Ag said:2040huck said:Science Denier said:2040huck said:Urban Ag said:agent-maroon said:YouBet said:
Well, I can see now why his brand of "Christianity" is a lie and wrong.Quote:
"I know personally that I've learned as much about my faith from Salman's tradition, from the Islamic mystics, from poets like Rumi, as much as I have from Christian authors and Christian writers," said Talarico.
His "faith" is nothing more than a cynical tool to influence weak minds into voting for him. He "practices" Christianity the same way that a psychopaths practices human emotions and empathy. He really doesn't understand it or feel any of it, but he can learn to go through the motions well enough to gain other's trust.
Correct. As I noted on another thread, Talarico provides a service to people raised in the church, mostly white liberals, who know they have participated in or embraced degenerate behaviors. He is a way out for them. An out that doesn't actually require anything of them as he has washed away their sins by normalizing them.
now do paxton
Paxton is a fierce conservative that has repeatedly gone after unconstitutional acts by the left. He's proven with actual action that he's not afraid to fight for and defend the constitution of the US.
except for the fraud repayments he made
Honestly, I'm trying to save you the effort.
No one cares. You're going to have to dig up something much, much, worse, than shady businesses dealings and crappy husband.
Most of us are simply casting the anti-commie vote. Paxton is the anti-commie in the race. So he gets my vote. Nothing is going to change that.
That's fine. Just stop with the "conservative values" crap
I apply "conservative values" to how he votes, and only how he votes. I honestly DGAF if he's a crap husband, sticks his wang in anything and everything he can, smokes a joint, drinks, etc.
Why? Because literally every politician has a personal life we could all tear apart if we cared enough to do so. They are no different than any other cross section of society. So going into any election with the understanding that both candidates are probably sleazballs makes it a lot easier to look at the only thing that really matters - how do they vote?
One of the candidates has an actual history of political conservative values, and backing them up.
The other still has a checking account with his mommy, thinks there are 6 genders, loves him some trans kids (to the point he gives them his phone number) and is a bona fide communist.
One will ostensibly vote in the manner I want. The other is guaranteed not to. The choice is easy and clear as to which one will be poltically better than the other.
Dang Not every politician is a sleazeball. Some are good people. Vote for good people.
Sometimes a candidate or officeholder is so bad you have to vote for someone who might not align 100% with your core policy values. (see also: Black Girl Tragic, Lina Hidalgo, etc.)