Political fallout and arguments regarding the US-Israeli action against Iran 022824

710,631 Views | 7016 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by YouBet
unimboti nkum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oops
Soso nikinombiki maaki dii.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sq 17 said:

Queso1 said:

I thought the Colin Powell line was "if you lie about WMDs enough, the American people will support your neocon agenda."


You can only run that scam once,

granted the true believers that support your side will always believe

but the other 60+% won't get fooled again

The damned this is, even if they weren't full bore going for nuclear weapons before this, they sure as hell will be in the future if any sort of the current recognizable government survives into the future. They could have been hemming and hawwing previously just for the concessions but now, they know for certainty that nuclear weapons means survival for their government and way of living (in their eyes of course).

This is what sucks most about this dilemma. If we don't solve this problem now, we are more likely than not, just kicking that can down the road and making it worse in the process. I just can't see solving the problem now without major escalation of the war to include at a minimum, limited ground incursion by US forces. If that happens, it would be a political bloodbath, more service members will die, and we will be in yet another intensely unpopular ME war. Again.

TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If things keep going the way they are we'll have a DarthTrump account to go with DarthPutin
unimboti nkum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eliminatus said:

HOLY S**T

Does he think he is a military mastermind?! Screenshotted from Truth myself. Link to it to prove it's real.

I know some will try to pass it off as just another Trumpism thing but I don't think it is. As we continue to get stuck further into this quagmire of Iran, he probably thinks he is still doing a good job of it all. This post from him is just dumb and tone deaf. Maybe he thinks a military solution is still on the table?

Playing whack a mole on weapons in the desert isn't going to move the needle. We have months of proof of this. Does anyone think escalating to at least limited ground incursions is not the only real military option left? Going after civilian infrastructure is political suicide IMO. Then again, so is military escalation. Hence, the no good options left IMO. Along with many others thinking.

To be frank, I am ready for us to concede and just leave. I say that as the non President of course and only having to think of me and mine but that option has to be looking attractive more and more I would suspect. It would be a massive blow to our world standing but whatever, we've all but been beaten completely last several wars anyways and our foreign diplomacy and word has been a joke regardless. At least this way we don't bankrupt our children further and we may save more lives.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/117039540734733872


General Deferment is on the case! Victory is at hand!
Soso nikinombiki maaki dii.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The more I look at this picture the funnier it is. Trump has more flare than either Patton and MacArthur. Also, MacAuthur is not wearing the right hat and his pipe was a corn cob pipe. One could argue that MacArhur was Trump before Trump was Trump.
TexasAggie73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whoever set MacArthur in the picture should be fired! That's terrible.
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eliminatus said:

HOLY ****

Does he think he is a military mastermind?! Screenshotted from Truth myself. Link to it to prove it's real.

I know some will try to pass it off as just another Trumpism thing but I don't think it is. As we continue to get stuck further into this quagmire of Iran, he probably thinks he is still doing a good job of it all. This post from him is just dumb and tone deaf. Maybe he thinks a military solution is still on the table?

Playing whack a mole on weapons in the desert isn't going to move the needle. We have months of proof of this. Does anyone think escalating to at least limited ground incursions is not the only real military option left? Going after civilian infrastructure is political suicide IMO. Then again, so is military escalation. Hence, the no good options left IMO. Along with many others thinking.

To be frank, I am ready for us to concede and just leave. I say that as the non President of course and only having to think of me and mine but that option has to be looking attractive more and more I would suspect. It would be a massive blow to our world standing but whatever, we've all but been beaten completely last several wars anyways and our foreign diplomacy and word has been a joke regardless. At least this way we don't bankrupt our children further and we may save more lives.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/117039540734733872

crazy that the president of the US is AI slopposting about a war he's mismanaging and it barely even registers on the radar of weird and inappropriate **** he does
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, how many times have we told ourselves that "this time" it actually will be a "limited" military operation. Then things just keep growing and growing.

I agree, we just have Iran the biggest incentive to get a nuke. However, I bet we can probably bribe them with enough concessions to where they won't pursue it - at least in the near future. But then they're going to use the lifting of sanctions and all the money they get to rebuild their military and missile program even bigger.

Also, for someone that never served, and is mucking up this "excursion" we're on right now, I that image is incredibly tone deaf.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:




Don't eve care anymore. Just leave and focus on the US and Western Hemisphere.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nvm, post above might be wrong.

YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

Nvm, post above might be wrong.




Well, now we have a known propaganda handle correcting a known liar and **** wall thrower. No idea what's true now.
Street Fighter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All part of the plan.
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny how military service or lack thereof for POTUS only matters when Trump is in office....makes you think
unimboti nkum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Soso nikinombiki maaki dii.
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This post is incredible.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
unimboti nkum said:



It does seem that this is where we're at with this war.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
lexofer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
[You're free to critique Trump's handling of this conflict, but the pic you posted has nothing to do with it. Stop derailing the thread and do not repost material that we remove -- Staff]
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HaroldShipmanAg said:

Funny how military service or lack thereof for POTUS only matters when Trump is in office....makes you think


Well, to be fair, he has been the only one to openly fantasize to the public about wearing the uniform while putting himself as an equal to two of our most celebrated military leaders in history. All while headlining one of the more intensely unpopular wars of his own making that has seen a number of old man empty threats and mishaps. Makes you think what an incredibly dumb thing to post, especially now of all times. Not even Biden did **** like this.

This is not a life or death thing of importance but still doesn't mean that there is any defending this. Unless China gets squirrelly soon, I think it very possible that Iran may come to define Trump's second term. Considering how it is going so far, not a great thing to be remembered for.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

Just about every country in the world tries to influence American domestic and internationally policy. Yet you only seem to care about one. And you only care about that one despite it being surrounded by counties that would literally slit your throat on live TV for being an infidel.

Can anyone explain how this makes any sense? I just don't get it. But I'm old, so maybe its some new thing.
I'm old, too. It is not a new thing.

A large percentage of Americans don't like it when any foreign country or its advocates use PACs, hundreds of millions in money, bribery, extortion, propaganda, threats, intimidation tactics, lies, false accusations, paid hacks, million-dollar ad campaigns, and/or disinformation to buy our politicians and strongly influence our voters.

It doesn't matter if it is Russia, China, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, France, Japan, the UK, etc etc etc.

Regarding the ongoing Iran War which most Americans oppose, the war has heightened the political feelings, public anger, and electoral blowback against any politician or candidate in either party who has accepted money and therefore allegedly been bought by pro-Israel groups.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

Keyno said:

Now we are asking for a 1.5 trillion military budget?


More misinformation you spout.

The 1.5 trillion budget request predated Epic Fury.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/07/trump-calls-record-defense-budget-00715298
The Iran war and other foreign military operations were being discussed and planned last summer. The requested $1.5T defense spending is directly connected to the foreign policy actions we're seeing right now by our country's Administration.

Unfortunately this one has has turned into a mess which is proving to be extremely difficult to wrap up and find an acceptable exit and ending.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

Im Gipper said:

Just about every country in the world tries to influence American domestic and internationally policy. Yet you only seem to care about one. And you only care about that one despite it being surrounded by counties that would literally slit your throat on live TV for being an infidel.

Can anyone explain how this makes any sense? I just don't get it. But I'm old, so maybe its some new thing.

I'm old, too. It is not a new thing.

A large percentage of Americans don't like it when any foreign country or its advocates use PACs, hundreds of millions in money, bribery, extortion, propaganda, threats, intimidation tactics, lies, false accusations, paid hacks, million-dollar ad campaigns, and/or disinformation to buy our politicians and strongly influence our voters.

It doesn't matter if it is Russia, China, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, France, Japan, the UK, etc etc etc.

Regarding the ongoing Iran War which most Americans oppose, the war has heightened the political feelings, public anger, and electoral blowback against any politician or candidate in either party who has accepted money and therefore allegedly been bought by pro-Israel groups.

That's a wide range of activities there, from legal to very illegal. I have only seen a couple of whacko's around here say all of that is what Israel is doing...
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

bobbranco said:

Keyno said:

Now we are asking for a 1.5 trillion military budget?


More misinformation you spout.

The 1.5 trillion budget request predated Epic Fury.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/07/trump-calls-record-defense-budget-00715298

The Iran war and other foreign military operations were being discussed and planned last summer. The requested $1.5T defense spending is directly connected to the foreign policy actions we're seeing right now by our country's Administration.

Unfortunately this one has has turned into a mess which is proving to be extremely difficult to wrap up and find an acceptable exit and ending.


Send proof. Otherwise it's your unverified opinion.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HaroldShipmanAg said:

Funny how military service or lack thereof for POTUS only matters when Trump is in office....makes you think

We've only had 4 presidents that never served in the military I'm the last 80 years. 15 total. As far as I know , none of them painted, photoshopped, or AIed themselves into uniform. Especially when they sought deferment for bone spurs, and during a time of war where Americans are dying.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

One could argue that MacArhur was Trump before Trump was Trump.
Not even remotely close.

Insane that Trump posted that on his account.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

YouBet said:

One could argue that MacArhur was Trump before Trump was Trump.
Not even remotely close.

Insane that Trump posted that on his account.


My point being that MacAuthur was a bloviating prima donna and pretty extreme narcissist. This is historical fact, my man.

I'm not saying he and Trump are exactly the same. Just that MacAuthur had some Trump in him.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Iran and Oman were finalizing a draft agreement Wednesday to reopen the Strait of Hormuz that would give Tehran oversight of ships entering the Persian Gulf but wouldn't let it levy tolls or service fees, people familiar with the matter said.

The parties have agreed on the main points of the draftwhich would set up an inbound lane near Iran and an outbound lane near Omanand have shared it with the U.S., countries in the region and Iran's top leaders, who still needed to sign off, they said.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told reporters Iran had reached an agreement with Oman to create a safe route through the Strait of Hormuz and that an outline of the main points was being completed.

A deal could still fall apart or fail to open the strait. Kazem Gharibabadi, deputy Iranian foreign minister, said the agreement with Oman wouldn't necessarily open the waterway unless the U.S. met unspecified conditions, state media reported.

Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

Quote:

Iran and Oman were finalizing a draft agreement Wednesday to reopen the Strait of Hormuz that would give Tehran oversight of ships entering the Persian Gulf but wouldn't let it levy tolls or service fees, people familiar with the matter said.

The parties have agreed on the main points of the draftwhich would set up an inbound lane near Iran and an outbound lane near Omanand have shared it with the U.S., countries in the region and Iran's top leaders, who still needed to sign off, they said.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told reporters Iran had reached an agreement with Oman to create a safe route through the Strait of Hormuz and that an outline of the main points was being completed.

A deal could still fall apart or fail to open the strait. Kazem Gharibabadi, deputy Iranian foreign minister, said the agreement with Oman wouldn't necessarily open the waterway unless the U.S. met unspecified conditions, state media reported.



The devil is in the details. The last line concerning the US meeting unspecified conditions caught my eye.
bigtruckguy3500
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you want to see the weekly strategic petroleum reserve level since they started keeping track: https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=WCSSTUS1&f=W

All kinds of answers out there on how low it can go before either 1) irreversible damage, 2) we reach the floor that the military keeps for their own strategic reserve, 3) at a certain point there will be oil down there, but we wouldn't be able to pull it out because it's either sludge or will slowly ooze out of the cavern walls
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just a reminder of the differences between Candidate Trump and President Trump.



Looking through the responses I wonder how many of these people feel differently today.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's really pretty simple. Much of what he has said consistently in the past doesn't align with where he is at today.

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YouBet said:

That is just egregiously bad. Goodness.


Could have been worse. At least he didn't post a pic of himself as Jesus… again…
HaroldShipmanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eliminatus said:

HaroldShipmanAg said:

Funny how military service or lack thereof for POTUS only matters when Trump is in office....makes you think


Well, to be fair, he has been the only one to openly fantasize to the public about wearing the uniform while putting himself as an equal to two of our most celebrated military leaders in history. All while headlining one of the more intensely unpopular wars of his own making that has seen a number of old man empty threats and mishaps. Makes you think what an incredibly dumb thing to post, especially now of all times. Not even Biden did **** like this.

This is not a life or death thing of importance but still doesn't mean that there is any defending this. Unless China gets squirrelly soon, I think it very possible that Iran may come to define Trump's second term. Considering how it is going so far, not a great thing to be remembered for.

This what I don't get Trump is trying to get take care of an issue that previous POTUS have punted on or done a bad job in handling but it seems this thread and board are actively rooting against him to spike the football on him and his supporters...Really weird to see.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, it distracted from a chosen conflict, and some are just furious Trump hasn't kept gas under $3/gallon this year as the priority item (plus DSA-Democrats who of course hate Trump and want Americans, but more importantly the Israeli partners to lose anyway). That's the priority to some, and it's not hard to figure out who they are. Heck, democrats don't even want to fund the pentagon.

Anyway, Pompeo did a good sit down regarding the conflict and risk of not taking on the Iranians this year.

He also said (Clash report for some reason breaks these up);
Quote:

Former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo:

At least Chairman Kimand I spent way too much time with that son of a gunhasn't conducted massive terror operations and killed thousands of Americans over the last decade.

The Iranians would have behaved very differently had they possessed the kind of nuclear program that Chairman Kim has.

The world would be a fundamentally different place.

Q: Do you still believe that some kind of regime change is possible in Iran?

Mike Pompeo: 100%.

So, that's the retort to the criticism we shouldn't have touched Iran. Now, the constant deal-no deal on ending it has been incredibly frustrating. The IRGC doesn't have solid command and control now and anything we agree to with someone over there can/is quickly torn up by some rocket/drone launches, or another faction.

Add, we all know it's hurt domestically politically.

He would later go on to say we are going to win this election whether we resolve the Iran situation before the election or not.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First Page Last Page
Page 191 of 201
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.