flown-the-coop said:

---

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

You were digging at Abbot not supporting Huffines. Lawt.

---

While I'll never miss the opportunity to take a dig at Abbott, I definitely voiced my support for Huffines there, while most were mocking him. I sincerely hope this was just an unforced error on his part.

---

It's not an error at all. See above. I could have written the Reddit you followed. Complete obvious the tactic here.

Make any connection to Epstein the worse potential scenario with ZERO facts to indicate such nefariousity whilst pretended you would support the dude if not for this in order to try and convince other supporters to abandon their support.

Bruh, it's very very obvious why this thread was created. Own it, don't be ashamed. Just don't get hurt when people call it out.

---

No. I supported Huffines for years until I found a thread on X about it in September. That one was about Huffines support of school choice and how he gave Mike Morath his start in Texas politics. I was looking up info on that at the time and a lady who is a public school advocate highlighted her dealings with him and brought up the story about the ranch. After researching and learning it was true, I dropped support for him. So my choices were establishment RINOs Hancock and Craddick, or Berlanga, who is actually a CPA. I'm unaware of the Reddit thread so link it if you have it. If it's within the last few days, they're just regurgitating the news.

And yet you ignored the ****ing reference in the post you quoted. I can't fix it if you're too dumb to read anything that contradicts your preconceived notions.

Go watch the ****ing miniseries instead of spewing all your nonsense here. Once you've done that, you're allowed to come back and have a discussion with the adults.

Aren't you sort of regurgitating this news?

So you supported him for years but dropped support when you heard he bought a ranch in Mew Mexico?

No, I think my prior posts pretty much sums up what this thread is.

Rapier108 said:

---

dreyOO said:

---

Gilligan said:

---

The entire Epstein thing is Unfathomable in my mind. Not humanly possible for people to do to other people the things that went on for political and monetary gain. ...and yet Houston and BCS are huge sex trafficking cities. Everyday. Everyday the unspeakable is happening. Around the world, in America, in our home towns. How is it not stamped out with extreme prejudice?

---

I'm aware of Houston's role of course, but BCS?? What am I missing?

---

Yeah, that makes no sense. Would love to hear his logic behind that claim.

And as almost everyone else has said, this thread makes no sense whatsoever, and anyone tying to claim it is to cover for Epstein needs to have their head examined.

---

We'd have to pull it out of somewhere first...

Pinochet said:

---

And yet you ignored the ****ing reference in the post you quoted. I can't fix it if you're too dumb to read anything that contradicts your preconceived notions.

Go watch the ****ing miniseries instead of spewing all your nonsense here. Once you've done that, you're allowed to come back and have a discussion with the adults.

---

You are having a tantrum slinging f-bombs around, calling me names, and then YOU call ME a child because I am unfamiliar with a Netflix documentary (that you did not even list the name of) and saw information that is contradictory to what you are saying on other news sites and sources?

Odd!

flown-the-coop said:

---

Aren't you sort of regurgitating this news?

So you supported him for years but dropped support when you heard he bought a ranch in Mew Mexico?

No, I think my prior posts pretty much sums up what this thread is.

---

If it's just within the last few days, then they had no clue until the media reported on it. I can't find the thread on Reddit you're talking about, but yes, I dropped my support for him after learning about the purchase. And the funds did not go to the victims because the victims fund closed in 2021. Keep supporting him if you want, but this is certainly valid news to know about a candidate.

Did you post here about the purchase when you first learned about it?

Chiffons no friend of mine. Met him a couple times and thought he and his associates were arrogant *****tards.

But seriously, why have you not been bringing this up more or did we miss it?

flown-the-coop said:

---

Did you post here about the purchase when you first learned about it?

Chiffons no friend of mine. Met him a couple times and thought he and his associates were arrogant *****tards.

But seriously, why have you not been bringing this up more or did we miss it?

---

No, I haven't brought it up here to my recollection, but I have shared it elsewhere. Would you have cared about it 6 months ago?

bonfarr said:

---

Weird pearl clutching from OP over this.

---

This. Of all the reasons to not vote for Huffines this one is at the bottom of the list.

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

And yet you ignored the ****ing reference in the post you quoted. I can't fix it if you're too dumb to read anything that contradicts your preconceived notions.

Go watch the ****ing miniseries instead of spewing all your nonsense here. Once you've done that, you're allowed to come back and have a discussion with the adults.

---

You are having a tantrum slinging f-bombs around, calling me names, and then YOU call ME a child because I am unfamiliar with a Netflix documentary (that you did not even list the name of) and saw information that is contradictory to what you are saying on other news sites and sources?

Odd!

---

You're just a troll. It's one of the top 10 shows on Netflix. I'm not giving you a link if you're not smart enough to be able to open Netflix. Or you went to Netflix and realized I was right, so now you're putting your head in the sand. I'm not looking for other links to prove you wrong because if you wanted to know the truth you would easily find these things. You're the one making weird accusations that make it clear you just listen to the TDS, anti-conservative twitter accounts that regurgitate "conspiracies" because you don't understand the real world. But hey, I bet you also believe that a tip to the FBI is proof someone did something wrong and that there are underground incinerators for the Clintons to cremate their victims on the property. Probably aliens kept underground too.

I have no clue why the ownership of this property is remotely relevant politically to anything involved here with Huffines.

He has a lot of money, and probably owns property in many locations.

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Did you post here about the purchase when you first learned about it?

Chiffons no friend of mine. Met him a couple times and thought he and his associates were arrogant *****tards.

But seriously, why have you not been bringing this up more or did we miss it?

---

No, I haven't brought it up here to my recollection, but I have shared it elsewhere. Would you have cared about it 6 months ago?

---

Translation: I waited with the intent of springing it when I could do the most damage to the campaign and get the most blue stars.

Unfortunately, OP seems to have miscalculated F16's ability to think for themselves. Except for a handful of CMs and libs to come out from under their rocks to support his jackassery.

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Did you post here about the purchase when you first learned about it?

Chiffons no friend of mine. Met him a couple times and thought he and his associates were arrogant *****tards.

But seriously, why have you not been bringing this up more or did we miss it?

---

No, I haven't brought it up here to my recollection, but I have shared it elsewhere. Would you have cared about it 6 months ago?

---

I don't even care about it now.

Of all the Epstein stuff I've seen, this might actually be the dumbest.

So...congrats I guess?

Quote:

---

"Four years after Mr.
Epstein's death, the Huffines family purchased property in New Mexico listed at public auction whose proceeds benefited his victims. Prior to the auction listing, they had never visited the property."
- Allen Blakemore, Spokesman

---

I'm mainly surprised that Blakemore is working against an Abbott appointee.

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Weird that there was a property Epstein owned for close to 30 years that was not investigated by the FBI. Since he sex trafficked so many women (just to himself and Ghislaine Maxwell) I would think that would be a place of interest.

---

What are you talking about? They did raid it. There was a search warrant executed years ago. There's a ****ing documentary miniseries on Netflix with a whole episode about it.

---

Can you link me to something that shows that?

I am not seeing any news articles that show it was raided. I see some from 2019 that say other properties were, but specify that the NM ranch was not.

Grok and ChatGPT say it was not raided by the FBI.

The Wikipedia page for the ranch says it was not raided.

So, I could be wrong, but everything I am seeing is saying it was not raided.

---

Once again, that is 100% the responsibility of Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Chris Wray. The property was sold before anyone appointed by Donald Trump took their job.

If there was evidence to be preserved for future investigations, why didn't any of these vocal lefties, Lincoln Project freaks, and concerned moderate billionaires take up a collection and buy the ranch to preserve the evidence or make a documentary of it and publish it for the world to see? The simple answer is that there was nothing remaining in 2023 that would have been evidence to illuminate the identity of conspirators or victims because the lawyers managing the Epstein estate would have had it cleansed and destroyed that evidence. That's precisely because Merrick Garland and all of his AUSAs sat on their hands and did nothing **during the Biden administration**.

The ranch was for sale and was going to be bought by someone wealthy enough to submit a winning bid, why not Huffines?

The condemnation of Huffines is asinine. It's like shunning Volkswagen drivers because of what the company did during the Third Reich.

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Aren't you sort of regurgitating this news?

So you supported him for years but dropped support when you heard he bought a ranch in Mew Mexico?

No, I think my prior posts pretty much sums up what this thread is.

---

If it's just within the last few days, then they had no clue until the media reported on it. I can't find the thread on Reddit you're talking about, but yes, I dropped my support for him after learning about the purchase. And the funds did not go to the victims because the victims fund closed in 2021. Keep supporting him if you want, but this is certainly valid news to know about a candidate.

---

But why do you care so much about this to drop your support of him?

What do you expect to happen with the property? Are you just wanting someone to blow it up and salt the earth?

At least a good steward now owns it and not a degenerate criminal.

Pinochet said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

And yet you ignored the ****ing reference in the post you quoted. I can't fix it if you're too dumb to read anything that contradicts your preconceived notions.

Go watch the ****ing miniseries instead of spewing all your nonsense here. Once you've done that, you're allowed to come back and have a discussion with the adults.

---

You are having a tantrum slinging f-bombs around, calling me names, and then YOU call ME a child because I am unfamiliar with a Netflix documentary (that you did not even list the name of) and saw information that is contradictory to what you are saying on other news sites and sources?

Odd!

---

You're just a troll. It's one of the top 10 shows on Netflix. I'm not giving you a link if you're not smart enough to be able to open Netflix. Or you went to Netflix and realized I was right, so now you're putting your head in the sand. I'm not looking for other links to prove you wrong because if you wanted to know the truth you would easily find these things. You're the one making weird accusations that make it clear you just listen to the TDS, anti-conservative twitter accounts that regurgitate "conspiracies" because you don't understand the real world. But hey, I bet you also believe that a tip to the FBI is proof someone did something wrong and that there are underground incinerators for the Clintons to cremate their victims on the property. Probably aliens kept underground too.

---

Oh, brother.

Ulysses90 said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Weird that there was a property Epstein owned for close to 30 years that was not investigated by the FBI. Since he sex trafficked so many women (just to himself and Ghislaine Maxwell) I would think that would be a place of interest.

---

What are you talking about? They did raid it. There was a search warrant executed years ago. There's a ****ing documentary miniseries on Netflix with a whole episode about it.

---

Can you link me to something that shows that?

I am not seeing any news articles that show it was raided. I see some from 2019 that say other properties were, but specify that the NM ranch was not.

Grok and ChatGPT say it was not raided by the FBI.

The Wikipedia page for the ranch says it was not raided.

So, I could be wrong, but everything I am seeing is saying it was not raided.

---

Once again, that is 100% the responsibility of Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Chris Wray. The property was sold before anyone appointed by Donald Trump took their job.

If there was evidence to be preserved for future investigations, why didn't any of these vocal lefties, Lincoln Project freaks, and concerned moderate billionaires take up a collection and buy the ranch to preserve the evidence or make a documentary of it and publish it for the world to see? The simple answer is that there was nothing remaining in 2023 that would have been evidence to illuminate the identity of conspirators or victims because the lawyers managing the Epstein estate would have had it cleansed and destroyed that evidence. That's precisely because Merrick Garland and all of his AUSAs sat on their hands and did nothing **during the Biden administration**.

The ranch was for sale and was going to be bought by someone wealthy enough to submit a winning bid, why not Huffines?

The condemnation of Huffines is asinine. It's like shunning Volkswagen drivers because of what the company did during the Third Reich.

---

Just read his posts on the Epstein thread.

He wants to get Trump so bad via Epstein.

Ulysses90 said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Weird that there was a property Epstein owned for close to 30 years that was not investigated by the FBI. Since he sex trafficked so many women (just to himself and Ghislaine Maxwell) I would think that would be a place of interest.

---

What are you talking about? They did raid it. There was a search warrant executed years ago. There's a ****ing documentary miniseries on Netflix with a whole episode about it.

---

Can you link me to something that shows that?

I am not seeing any news articles that show it was raided. I see some from 2019 that say other properties were, but specify that the NM ranch was not.

Grok and ChatGPT say it was not raided by the FBI.

The Wikipedia page for the ranch says it was not raided.

So, I could be wrong, but everything I am seeing is saying it was not raided.

---

Once again, that is 100% the responsibility of Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Chris Wray. The property was sold before anyone appointed by Donald Trump took their job.

If there was evidence to be preserved for future investigations, why didn't any of these vocal lefties, Lincoln Project freaks, and concerned moderate billionaires take up a collection and buy the ranch to preserve the evidence or make a documentary of it and publish it for the world to see? The simple answer is that there was nothing remaining in 2023 that would have been evidence to illuminate the identity of conspirators or victims because the lawyers managing the Epstein estate would have had it cleansed and destroyed that evidence. That's precisely because Merrick Garland and all of his AUSAs sat on their hands and did nothing **during the Biden administration**.

The ranch was for sale and was going to be bought by someone wealthy enough to submit a winning bid, why not Huffines?

The condemnation of Huffines is asinine. It's like shunning Volkswagen drivers because of what the company did during the Third Reich.

---

I didn't say anything about Trump.

I'd think the property would/should have been looked into regardless of if it were Biden or Trump or Dwayne the Rock Johnson in office.

But maybe I am the one who is off base for thinking that it would be a good idea for our government to dig deeper into an international sex trafficking operation. Or maybe the government had some sort of information that only pointed to rape and trafficking happening in NY and Little St. James.

YouBet said:

---

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Aren't you sort of regurgitating this news?

So you supported him for years but dropped support when you heard he bought a ranch in Mew Mexico?

No, I think my prior posts pretty much sums up what this thread is.

---

If it's just within the last few days, then they had no clue until the media reported on it. I can't find the thread on Reddit you're talking about, but yes, I dropped my support for him after learning about the purchase. And the funds did not go to the victims because the victims fund closed in 2021. Keep supporting him if you want, but this is certainly valid news to know about a candidate.

---

But why do you care so much about this to drop your support of him?

What do you expect to happen with the property? Are you just wanting someone to blow it up and salt the earth?

At least a good steward now owns it and not a degenerate criminal.

---

Huffines has always branded himself as a Christian, ultra-conservative, and pro-family, which lines up well with my convictions as a homeschool father who just wants to government to leave me alone. He was the most conservative Senator during his term.

Being associated with Epstein in any form is problematic for me. The fact that it was bought in secret and it's only being disclosed now because of a lot of digging is suspect. Obviously, I'm in the minority on this one, so he may win without a runoff if the latest polls are right.

Rapier108 said:

---

Ulysses90 said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Weird that there was a property Epstein owned for close to 30 years that was not investigated by the FBI. Since he sex trafficked so many women (just to himself and Ghislaine Maxwell) I would think that would be a place of interest.

---

What are you talking about? They did raid it. There was a search warrant executed years ago. There's a ****ing documentary miniseries on Netflix with a whole episode about it.

---

Can you link me to something that shows that?

I am not seeing any news articles that show it was raided. I see some from 2019 that say other properties were, but specify that the NM ranch was not.

Grok and ChatGPT say it was not raided by the FBI.

The Wikipedia page for the ranch says it was not raided.

So, I could be wrong, but everything I am seeing is saying it was not raided.

---

Once again, that is 100% the responsibility of Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Chris Wray. The property was sold before anyone appointed by Donald Trump took their job.

If there was evidence to be preserved for future investigations, why didn't any of these vocal lefties, Lincoln Project freaks, and concerned moderate billionaires take up a collection and buy the ranch to preserve the evidence or make a documentary of it and publish it for the world to see? The simple answer is that there was nothing remaining in 2023 that would have been evidence to illuminate the identity of conspirators or victims because the lawyers managing the Epstein estate would have had it cleansed and destroyed that evidence. That's precisely because Merrick Garland and all of his AUSAs sat on their hands and did nothing **during the Biden administration**.

The ranch was for sale and was going to be bought by someone wealthy enough to submit a winning bid, why not Huffines?

The condemnation of Huffines is asinine. It's like shunning Volkswagen drivers because of what the company did during the Third Reich.

---

Just read his posts on the Epstein thread.

He wants to get Trump so bad via Epstein.

---

Not true lmao

Pinochet said:

---

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Did you post here about the purchase when you first learned about it?

Chiffons no friend of mine. Met him a couple times and thought he and his associates were arrogant *****tards.

But seriously, why have you not been bringing this up more or did we miss it?

---

No, I haven't brought it up here to my recollection, but I have shared it elsewhere. Would you have cared about it 6 months ago?

---

Translation: I waited with the intent of springing it when I could do the most damage to the campaign and get the most blue stars.

Unfortunately, OP seems to have miscalculated F16's ability to think for themselves. Except for a handful of CMs and libs to come out from under their rocks to support his jackassery.

---

No, there has been little available other than knowing when the LLC bought it and a bizapedia page showing Colin Huffines as a contact. It's taken months for Huffines to acknowledge he bought it.

Was taking about Epstein at work last week and one of my coworkers said he had been to Zorro Ranch. Said one of his college buddies is the son of the owner. Was not allowed to say any names because the new owners were religious and did not want their name associated with Epstein. Crazy that this blew up a few days later. He said that the furniture and decor in the house was Epstein's. Also has a huge library full of Epstein's books.

IIIHorn said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

Trigger06 said:

---

If you can't buy property where something bad happened, there would be a lot of ghost towns out there.

---

All of this land in North America is stolen, or so I am told.

---

Where was it before?

---

Pangea

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Did you post here about the purchase when you first learned about it?

Chiffons no friend of mine. Met him a couple times and thought he and his associates were arrogant *****tards.

But seriously, why have you not been bringing this up more or did we miss it?

---

No, I haven't brought it up here to my recollection, but I have shared it elsewhere. Would you have cared about it 6 months ago?

---

Still cannot figure out why anyone cares about this now. Huffines has reportedly never been to the place.

I think the market for 25k+ sf mansions on ranches with private airstrips may not be that deep and this one was available due to the recent death of the owner.

You suggestion is that after years of being a Huffines supporter, you woke up Feb 15, 2026 to post about something you learned about 6 months ago, conveniently right after Stansbury and others started yipping about it.

And from that you have withdrawn your support because I assume you believe there to be something nefarious afoot to cover up Epstein crimes. Conveniently I guess since Huffines is a big MAGA guy.

Weird timing.

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

Huffines has always branded himself as a Christian, ultra-conservative, and pro-family, which lines up well with my convictions as a homeschool father who just wants to government to leave me alone. He was the most conservative Senator during his term.

Being associated with Epstein in any form is problematic for me. The fact that it was bought in secret and it's only being disclosed now because of a lot of digging is suspect. Obviously, I'm in the minority on this one, so he may win without a runoff if the latest polls are right.

---

You want to be left alone but you are also wanting to climb up Huffines tale pipe because he bought a ranch once owned by Epstein. Has anyone even been to the place in the last decade?

flown-the-coop said:

---

SociallyConditionedAg said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Did you post here about the purchase when you first learned about it?

Chiffons no friend of mine. Met him a couple times and thought he and his associates were arrogant *****tards.

But seriously, why have you not been bringing this up more or did we miss it?

---

No, I haven't brought it up here to my recollection, but I have shared it elsewhere. Would you have cared about it 6 months ago?

---

Still cannot figure out why anyone cares about this now. Huffines has reportedly never been to the place.

I think the market for 25k+ sf mansions on ranches with private airstrips may not be that deep and this one was available due to the recent death of the owner.

You suggestion is that after years of being a Huffines supporter, you woke up Feb 15, 2026 to post about something you learned about 6 months ago, conveniently right after Stansbury and others started yipping about it.

And from that you have withdrawn your support because I assume you believe there to be something nefarious afoot to cover up Epstein crimes. Conveniently I guess since Huffines is a big MAGA guy.

Weird timing.

---

Huffines stated he never went to the ranch before it was sold. He did hold an engagement party for his son there (where people had to sign NDAs), so it's obvious he has been to the property. I posted this revise because the article just came out. I'm sorry the article didn't meet your timing expectations but getting upset with me over Huffines or the author is just... weird.

Zachary Klement said:

---

Ulysses90 said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Weird that there was a property Epstein owned for close to 30 years that was not investigated by the FBI. Since he sex trafficked so many women (just to himself and Ghislaine Maxwell) I would think that would be a place of interest.

---

What are you talking about? They did raid it. There was a search warrant executed years ago. There's a ****ing documentary miniseries on Netflix with a whole episode about it.

---

Can you link me to something that shows that?

I am not seeing any news articles that show it was raided. I see some from 2019 that say other properties were, but specify that the NM ranch was not.

Grok and ChatGPT say it was not raided by the FBI.

The Wikipedia page for the ranch says it was not raided.

So, I could be wrong, but everything I am seeing is saying it was not raided.

---

Once again, that is 100% the responsibility of Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Chris Wray. The property was sold before anyone appointed by Donald Trump took their job.

If there was evidence to be preserved for future investigations, why didn't any of these vocal lefties, Lincoln Project freaks, and concerned moderate billionaires take up a collection and buy the ranch to preserve the evidence or make a documentary of it and publish it for the world to see? The simple answer is that there was nothing remaining in 2023 that would have been evidence to illuminate the identity of conspirators or victims because the lawyers managing the Epstein estate would have had it cleansed and destroyed that evidence. That's precisely because Merrick Garland and all of his AUSAs sat on their hands and did nothing **during the Biden administration**.

The ranch was for sale and was going to be bought by someone wealthy enough to submit a winning bid, why not Huffines?

The condemnation of Huffines is asinine. It's like shunning Volkswagen drivers because of what the company did during the Third Reich.

---

I didn't say anything about Trump.

I'd think the property would/should have been looked into regardless of if it were Biden or Trump or Dwayne the Rock Johnson in office.

But maybe I am the one who is off base for thinking that it would be a good idea for our government to dig deeper into an international sex trafficking operation. Or maybe the government had some sort of information that only pointed to rape and trafficking happening in NY and Little St. James.

---

Why is any of that the problem of a real estate buyer whose name happens to be Huffines? Why should he, or anyone else, boycott a real estate listing because the DoJ did not do what you would have done if you were AG? These events have nothing whatsoever to do with Huffines qualifications to hold elected office and they say nothing about his morality for buying property that has a 'dark history.'

The battlefield at Fort Pillow where Nathan Forrest's soldiers killed union POWs is now a Tennessee State Park. That ain't going to happen at Zorro Ranch no matter how much the TDS crazies want it to happen or want January 6 to be declared a national day of morning. Those folks need to get. a. life.

Ulysses90 said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Ulysses90 said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Pinochet said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Weird that there was a property Epstein owned for close to 30 years that was not investigated by the FBI. Since he sex trafficked so many women (just to himself and Ghislaine Maxwell) I would think that would be a place of interest.

---

What are you talking about? They did raid it. There was a search warrant executed years ago. There's a ****ing documentary miniseries on Netflix with a whole episode about it.

---

Can you link me to something that shows that?

I am not seeing any news articles that show it was raided. I see some from 2019 that say other properties were, but specify that the NM ranch was not.

Grok and ChatGPT say it was not raided by the FBI.

The Wikipedia page for the ranch says it was not raided.

So, I could be wrong, but everything I am seeing is saying it was not raided.

---

Once again, that is 100% the responsibility of Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Chris Wray. The property was sold before anyone appointed by Donald Trump took their job.

If there was evidence to be preserved for future investigations, why didn't any of these vocal lefties, Lincoln Project freaks, and concerned moderate billionaires take up a collection and buy the ranch to preserve the evidence or make a documentary of it and publish it for the world to see? The simple answer is that there was nothing remaining in 2023 that would have been evidence to illuminate the identity of conspirators or victims because the lawyers managing the Epstein estate would have had it cleansed and destroyed that evidence. That's precisely because Merrick Garland and all of his AUSAs sat on their hands and did nothing **during the Biden administration**.

The ranch was for sale and was going to be bought by someone wealthy enough to submit a winning bid, why not Huffines?

The condemnation of Huffines is asinine. It's like shunning Volkswagen drivers because of what the company did during the Third Reich.

---

I didn't say anything about Trump.

I'd think the property would/should have been looked into regardless of if it were Biden or Trump or Dwayne the Rock Johnson in office.

But maybe I am the one who is off base for thinking that it would be a good idea for our government to dig deeper into an international sex trafficking operation. Or maybe the government had some sort of information that only pointed to rape and trafficking happening in NY and Little St. James.

---

Why is any of that the problem of a real estate buyer whose name happens to be Huffines? Why should he, or anyone else, boycott a real estate listing because the DoJ did not do what you would have done if you were AG? These events have nothing whatsoever to do with Huffines qualifications to hold elected office and they say nothing about his morality for buying property that has a 'dark history.'

The battlefield at Fort Pillow where Nathan Forrest's soldiers killed union POWs is now a Tennessee State Park. That ain't going to happen at Zorro Ranch no matter how much the TDS crazies want it to happen or want January 6 to be declared a national day of morning. Those folks need to get. a. life.

---

Yeah, my bigger issue is with our government not looking into it than Huffines buying it.

I do think it is odd, I simply would not want to own a property where sex trafficking was likely happening less than a decade ago, but I personally would not want to own a home where someone committed suicide previously or something of that nature. I get others feel differently.

Sure.

flown-the-coop said:

---

Sure.

---

You expected me to post an X link and a bizapedia article listing Colin Huffines as the contact? Because that's basically all I had a week ago and that thread would be nuked in two minutes. The story made headlines with Huffines admission and I posted it. If you have an issue with timing, get in touch with the author.

So would you have rather had it nuked? Or salted? Why do you care who owned it before Huffines bought it?

I bought a car from one of the Huffines dealerships.

Am I similarly tainted by Epstein?

Azeew said:

---

So would you have rather had it nuked? Or salted? Why do you care who owned it before Huffines bought it?

---

It needs to be investigated. He purchased it under an anonymous LLC, as can be done in New Mexico, placed his son as LLC manager, and his wife signed the tax documents. If it's just a business transaction, why the secrecy? Considering the fact that he runs for a different office every few years, why risk purchasing a property with such a sordid history? The Epstein case is a world wide scandal touching thousands of leaders, so why risk attaching your name to it?

Quote:

---

If it's just a business transaction, why the secrecy?

---

Weirdo threads like this is probably the EXACT reason he did it.


(2 v 243 Bluestars in a OP vs. first post against has to be a record)