FBI Raiding Fulton County Election Office

30,219 Views | 371 Replies | Last: 18 days ago by txags92
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Riddle me this, why would that many deceased and out of staters still be on the voter rolls? They are not supposed to still be there.

Could it be because of ERIC inflating the voter rolls to enable voting fraud? Hmm. Think a little abit.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Could inactive voters vote? Also, in Cali, if you cannot show an ID how do they prevent you from voting more than once?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Could inactive voters vote? Also, in Cali, if you cannot show an ID how do they prevent you from voting more than once?

In theory the voters still need to check in before voting, just not present proof. That check-in should be on a large database showing they voted already.

Again, that's in theory. Los Angeles County uses a proprietary electronic voting machine system specially made fr them by Smartmatic.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A country with over 1 million illegals has no voter ID and uses a proprietary voting system.

The same place that has 25% of its emergency vehicles out of service and drains its reservoirs during fire season. What could possibly go wrong?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

A country with over 1 million illegals has no voter ID and uses a proprietary voting system.

The same place that has 25% of its emergency vehicles out of service and drains its reservoirs during fire season. What could possibly go wrong?

Designed to the County's specifications. How many back doors has been coded into it?
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cheating and fraud occurs in EVERY aspect of life (marriage, sports, business etc.) yet we're to believe that voting is beyond reproach, especially in liberal states like California and Minnesota where we know fraud is rampant.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:

Cheating and fraud occurs in EVERY aspect of life (marriage, sports, business etc.) yet we're to believe that voting is beyond reproach, especially in liberal states like California and Minnesota where we know fraud is rampant.



"We know fraud is rampant."

Well I've heard enough evidence. Reason enough to let the executive take control over the constitutional rights of a state to govern its elections. And ONLY in liberal states.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

Prosperdick said:

Cheating and fraud occurs in EVERY aspect of life (marriage, sports, business etc.) yet we're to believe that voting is beyond reproach, especially in liberal states like California and Minnesota where we know fraud is rampant.



"We know fraud is rampant."

Well I've heard enough evidence. Reason enough to let the executive take control over the constitutional rights of a state to govern its elections. And ONLY in liberal states.

Setting broad standards for national elections in all the states is not "taking control of the state's elections", but you know that and are just grandstanding for hysterics. Go ahead and carry on, but just know that nobody is buying it. We all know the reality.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd think someone in Georgia would be more concerned about votes being manufactured, but I guess it's ok since you voted for all the democrats.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just to be clear, I believe fraud is occurring in EVERY state and that there is cheating in elections at every level but for anyone to infer that somehow fraud in Minnesota and California is somehow a conspiracy theory is absurd.

Hell just today it came out that the idiot who keyed 6 Tesla's in Minnesota because Elon's DOGE team had the audacity to find fraud, waste and abuse was a financial policy compliance lead who was in charge of reviews of Medicaid fraud.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

We all know the reality.


Do we? What if Trump's claims are wrong?

Trump has been making claims of massive election fraud since 2016. Ten years.

There have been many investigations. No election fraud has been found.

Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeschutesAg said:

Quote:

We all know the reality.


Do we? What if Trump's claims are wrong?

Trump has been making claims of massive election fraud since 2016. Ten years.

There have been many investigations. No election fraud has been found.



How on earth do you prove election fraud with no ID presented and no chain of custody on the ballots?

You also have instances of potential tainted ballots mixed in with real ballots where the judges have to throw up their hands and say "too late" and when they tried to stop it beforehand they were told by the same judges they had no standing.

This whole claim of "no election fraud has been found" is such BS when all safe guards have been shouted down by Democrats for decades, voter rolls are never updated, and MIB's sent to every person who has ever registered in a state with very little to no oversight whatsoever.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeschutesAg said:

Quote:

We all know the reality.


Do we? What if Trump's claims are wrong?

Trump has been making claims of massive election fraud since 2016. Ten years.

There have been many investigations. No election fraud has been found.




To any reasonable person that has the courage to actually look at the evidence there is convincing evidence of large scale coordinated election fraud in registrations and ballot fraud. If you don't have the courage to weigh the evidence, you won't see it.

The Georgia AG in 2020 refused to investigate when given evidence and sworn affidavits because he was a "team player" and Governor Kemp didn't want an investigation. Kemp later appointed him to be a state judge.

JWinTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've always said that there's nothing you can do but accept it when the authorities are shown proof of a crime and just say they see nothing and move along. And in 2020, that's what happens in Georgia. Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

To any reasonable person that has the courage to actually look at the evidence there is convincing evidence of large scale coordinated election fraud in registrations and ballot fraud.


Where is this convincing evidence? Sworn affadavits and numerous allegations of election fraud were submitted in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and were all found to be false.

Quote:

The Georgia AG in 2020 refused to investigate when given evidence and sworn affidavits because he was a "team player" and Governor Kemp didn't want an investigation. Kemp later appointed him to be a state judge.


The Georgia AG since 2016 has been Chris Carr. He isn't a state judge.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90 said:

DeschutesAg said:

Quote:

We all know the reality.


Do we? What if Trump's claims are wrong?

Trump has been making claims of massive election fraud since 2016. Ten years.

There have been many investigations. No election fraud has been found.




To any reasonable person that has the courage to actually look at the evidence there is convincing evidence of large scale coordinated election fraud in registrations and ballot fraud. If you don't have the courage to weigh the evidence, you won't see it.

The Georgia AG in 2020 refused to investigate when given evidence and sworn affidavits because he was a "team player" and Governor Kemp didn't want an investigation. Kemp later appointed him to be a state judge.




Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the bird is going to **** on the board and strut around like it won anyway.
Shannon L. Alder
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You all know you can just post this crap into ai now and get the answer, right?

Try it:

"Is there evidence of election fraud in the Georgia in 2020 presidential election that could have possibly changed the result?"

You can't make crap up with AI. It looks at all the known knowledge on the planet in seconds. But I'm sure Don is going to have his crack team SIX YEARS later uncover the fraud.

How good are your records from six years ago? He's going to find "missing" or "inadequately stored" records from six years ago and claim unsubstantiated fraud. There are reasons for statutes of limitations. Lack of evidence is not evidence. Pigeon is gonna knock over the chess pieces, **** on the board and claim victory.

It still amazes me that a solid 30% of the country believes whatever the man says.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because AI never makes mistakes or lies, right?
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

You all know you can just post this crap into ai now and get the answer, right?

Try it:

"Is there evidence of election fraud in the Georgia in 2020 presidential election that could have possibly changed the result?"

You can't make crap up with AI. It looks at all the known knowledge on the planet in seconds. But I'm sure Don is going to have his crack team SIX YEARS later uncover the fraud.

How good are your records from six years ago? He's going to find "missing" or "inadequately stored" records from six years ago and claim unsubstantiated fraud. There are reasons for statutes of limitations. Lack of evidence is not evidence. Pigeon is gonna knock over the chess pieces, **** on the board and claim victory.

It still amazes me that a solid 30% of the country believes whatever the man says.


You trust Reddit/AI for factual information?
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeschutesAg said:

Quote:

To any reasonable person that has the courage to actually look at the evidence there is convincing evidence of large scale coordinated election fraud in registrations and ballot fraud.


Where is this convincing evidence? Sworn affadavits and numerous allegations of election fraud were submitted in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and were all found to be false.

Quote:

The Georgia AG in 2020 refused to investigate when given evidence and sworn affidavits because he was a "team player" and Governor Kemp didn't want an investigation. Kemp later appointed him to be a state judge.


The Georgia AG since 2016 has been Chris Carr. He isn't a state judge.


I can't tell if you are being deliberately obtuse or are truly ignorant. Of the ~60 cases filed across the country, almost every single one was dismissed by judges on the basis of lack 99f standing without ever entering the evidence into the record or evaluating it. To claim that the evidence was lacking without the evidence ever being allowed to be presented is part of the corruption. No admission of evidence means it can't be appealed and heard by a higher court.

The evidence seized by the DoJ documenting the fraudulent counting of ballots in Georgia, the existence of hundreds of thousands of counterfeit ballots that were all scanned copies.

The evidence of deliberate fraud in the design of the Dominion and Smartmatic voting machines and software was suppressed and when those making the allegations, Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, were sued by Smartmatic, the evidence of fraud and tampering that they alleged was ruled in admissible so they could not even use it to defend themselves. The DoJ and state courts didn't only refuse to hear the cases abd look at the evidence, they used the tort system to financially destroy those who tried to file protests in the courts.

Tina Peters was jailed (and remains in state prison) for 9 years over collecting evidence of tampering with Dominion voting machines prior to the 2020 election that documented violations of the Colorado law on certifying the voting machines' software before the election. Peters showed that the Colorado Secretary of State, Jenna Griswold, had posted the admin passwords for the state's voting machines on a public facing website for months prior to the election that would allow anyone with physical access to access the software abd break certification. The state of Colorado imprisoned Peters for allegedly doing what the Colorado Secretary of State actually did.

Worse yet, 4G LTE and 3G GSM modems have been found to be installed hardware on the circuit boards of Dominion and Smartmatic machines that allowed external real time access.

https://rumble.com/v750gi4-electronic-voting-machines-votes-are-able-to-be-flipped-with-a-25-dollar-wi.html



CNN documented over 8 years ago how the voting machines could be easily hacked.



Jovan Hutton Pulitzer lays out in the video below how the election was stolen in the state of Arizona.

https://www.youtube.com/live/nMD-yfaL_cU?si=wVbZH8Zl-3LtiRf_

This is evidence that has never been heard by a jury under the Biden DoJ. Thanks to the Trump DoJ, it's being investigated and will be filed in courts where it won't be dismissed by corrupt judges and the evidence will be evaluated.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That poster knows everything you're saying is true. He's going to continue to "Lalalalalalalalalala!" because that's what he's is here to do. NO person who wants fair elections is against requiring proof for citizenship and voter ID.

And Georgia will vote Democrat again. Because that's who he is. He hasn't seen the light and he isn't going to.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

GeorgiAg said:

You all know you can just post this crap into ai now and get the answer, right?

Try it:

"Is there evidence of election fraud in the Georgia in 2020 presidential election that could have possibly changed the result?"

You can't make crap up with AI. It looks at all the known knowledge on the planet in seconds. But I'm sure Don is going to have his crack team SIX YEARS later uncover the fraud.

How good are your records from six years ago? He's going to find "missing" or "inadequately stored" records from six years ago and claim unsubstantiated fraud. There are reasons for statutes of limitations. Lack of evidence is not evidence. Pigeon is gonna knock over the chess pieces, **** on the board and claim victory.

It still amazes me that a solid 30% of the country believes whatever the man says.


You trust Reddit/AI for factual information?

Explains why he voted for an autopen hiding in a basement.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeschutesAg said:

Quote:

To any reasonable person that has the courage to actually look at the evidence there is convincing evidence of large scale coordinated election fraud in registrations and ballot fraud.



Where is this convincing evidence? Sworn affadavits and numerous allegations of election fraud were submitted in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and were all found to be false.

Quote:

The Georgia AG in 2020 refused to investigate when given evidence and sworn affidavits because he was a "team player" and Governor Kemp didn't want an investigation. Kemp later appointed him to be a state judge.


The Georgia AG since 2016 has been Chris Carr. He isn't a state judge.

In which cases were the affidavits found to be false? Because I am pretty sure that no fact finder has ever determined them to be false.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:



It still amazes me that a solid 30% of the country believes whatever the man says.

This is a silly, incorrect statement.

Most people on here don't believe half of what Trump says.

But, we can look at the evidence in this case and come up with a logical conclusion that there is way too much smoke here, and too few safeguards, for there not to be a fire.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are using AI wrong.

Grok also thinks that Obama is arguably one of the top 10 presidents ever.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

You are using AI wrong.

Grok also thinks that Obama is arguably one of the top 10 presidents ever.

AI still has a long way too go but essentially garbage in garbage out needs major clean-up before anyone can reliably take their feedback seriously.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are correct. I misspoke. It wasn't the Georgia AG but a state attorney in Fulton County. I will try to find the name and the name of the individual presenting the evidence of fraud to who he stated he would not investigate because Kemp didn't want any investigations into the 2020 vote.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosperdick said:

BusterAg said:

You are using AI wrong.

Grok also thinks that Obama is arguably one of the top 10 presidents ever.

AI still has a long way too go but essentially garbage in garbage out needs major clean-up before anyone can reliably take their feedback seriously.

And lawyers, of all people, should know the difference.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AI lacks intuition. May always lack that, we will see what the future holds.

But it is unable to take large fact and accusation sets and determine if something could have or more likely could have occurred.

It's a historical record not something that can take that history and analyze it in broader concepts and with some of the doubt, misrememberance and creativity that give humans advantage when evaluating the world around them.

Misrememberance is vital to human creativity, intuition and ingenuity. As vital that random errors in transcoding DNA mixing of genes is vital evolution.

If you use AI, understand what it is good at and is not good at.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

flown-the-coop said:

Could inactive voters vote? Also, in Cali, if you cannot show an ID how do they prevent you from voting more than once?

In theory the voters still need to check in before voting, just not present proof. That check-in should be on a large database showing they voted already.

Again, that's in theory. Los Angeles County uses a proprietary electronic voting machine system specially made fr them by Smartmatic.

California fraud is just next level for elections.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
60 Judges - both R and D, GOP officials, three vote counts, current versions of Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Claude, Meta, Mitch McConnell after the impeachment vote speech, six years, Attorney General Bill Barr, documentary they had to pull and apologize for, FoxNews paying 3/4 of a billion dollars, other pending defamation lawsuits still going on - all wrong, only lack of standing, must be RINOs,

vs.

One guy is a narcissistic nut who can't accept that he lost an election.


Gotta be the former. /f16

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When will finally admit you voted for Kamala too?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GeorgiAg said:

60 Judges - both R and D, GOP officials, three vote counts, current versions of Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Claude, Meta, Mitch McConnell after the impeachment vote speech, six years, Attorney General Bill Barr, documentary they had to pull and apologize for, FoxNews paying 3/4 of a billion dollars, other pending defamation lawsuits still going on - all wrong, only lack of standing, must be RINOs,

vs.

One guy is a narcissistic nut who can't accept that he lost an election.


Gotta be the former. /f16



So did you get all of that from wikipedia or AI? Or maybe some rando reddit board?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

GeorgiAg said:

60 Judges - both R and D, GOP officials, three vote counts, current versions of Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Claude, Meta, Mitch McConnell after the impeachment vote speech, six years, Attorney General Bill Barr, documentary they had to pull and apologize for, FoxNews paying 3/4 of a billion dollars, other pending defamation lawsuits still going on - all wrong, only lack of standing, must be RINOs,

vs.

One guy is a narcissistic nut who can't accept that he lost an election.


Gotta be the former. /f16



So did you get all of that from wikipedia or AI? Or maybe some rando reddit board?

Quit engaging. He will never acknowledge that of those "60 judges", nearly all of them threw the cases out on procedural grounds without ever letting any of the evidence be presented. He knows that to be the case because he is a lawyer and has had it pointed out to him multiple times since 2020, but he bitterly clings to his 2021 reddit talking points because that is all he has.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wasn't engaging. I was openly laughing at him. Bless his heart.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.