BigRobSA said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Sid Farkas said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'd be glad to get into it.

---

An hour and a half and several posts later…

---

Maybe Candace's fake French assassins got him.

---

or Macron's she-man wife.

---

You NPCs know that it's like 80 degrees outside and there's playoff football on right?

---

How can we possibly enjoy being outside when there's a bee cult out there taking out conservatives?

---

Jewish bees

---

Charlie loved Israel!
Charlie wasn't being pressured by jewish donors
Charlie didn't even have jewish donors
There was no meeting with Jewish donors.
There was no meeting.
Okay there was a meeting but it wasn't with jewish donors
Okay, there was a meeting with jewish donors, but it was friendly
Text messages from charlie saying the jewish donors were pressuring him, isn't real
Okay, the text messages are real, but it doesn't mean anything
You're an antisemite if you question why a bunch of Jewish donors want to fund an evangelical Christian organization! <--- you are here

this is 100% a psyop

Nazi Candace Owens comes up with every single batsh@t crazy conspiracy theory except the ACTUAL one.

that the left wants to create dissension and promote "right wing Nazis" as the face of the party.

so coincidentally, Marjorie Taylor Greene- a BACKBENCHER House member who has never done ANYTHING is in the news every single day.

have you asked why that is?

and Candace, some uneducated illiterate who every single episode makes up English words and gets basic words wrong ("alex Jones has entered the foray")

she suddenly has millions of "new followers"

Lots of name calling, no substance.

I'm just going to ignore you can't come up with a reasonable argument. I'm 90% convinced you're a bot.

Hi Candace.

Is that supposed to be an insult?

I could care less about candice, or trying to defend her.What I find puzzling is the people who criticize her never actually mention details. They just name call.

I took charlie kirk's murder personally. I call b******* on so many details of the official story. And so should any one who followed charlie.

It is the only response your post is worthy of.

Psycho Bunny said:

---

infinity ag said:

---

I don't know Erika but...

I just don't like her. I just get a very bad feeling. She seems fake to me and too much drama. If I lost my spouse, I would be in depression for months/years and deal with it in private with my family or with a doctor. Not on stage with well-curated lines. But then I guess everyone is different.

Liked Charlie, do not like Erika. I wish her well though. I think she will find another man pretty quickly and marry him and give some religious justification for doing so. Her moving-on will be quick.

---

Dear facebook,

If I lost my spouse this is how I would react.

Guess what, you haven't lost your spouse so you have no idea how you would react. Just like I will never understand a parent who loses a child.

When I lost my dad back in 2020, I had no idea how my mom would react. You don't know till you are in that moment. So tired of hearing the self-righteous run around, talking about how Erika is not grieving properly.

Find a new horse to beat.

---

Why are you defending Erika so much? Do you have a thing for her?

I just think there is something phony about her. It's my view and unless I notice something that goes against it I am sticking to that view.

Get over yourself.

The left. The MSM has been horrible to her like they never would if her husband would've been a lefty.
Social media. People can spew their hate and conspiracy theories.
Unfortunately conservatives as well. Key example is the abhorrent and disgusting Candace Owens.

PDEMDHC said:

---

It's not just Candace. People who cheered his death are looking for any excuse to justify it. They are going after the wife for anything now.

---

This is exactly right. People will do anything to calm the cognitive dissonance that rings so loudly in their ears.

Farmer_J said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Sid Farkas said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'd be glad to get into it.

---

An hour and a half and several posts later…

---

Maybe Candace's fake French assassins got him.

---

or Macron's she-man wife.

---

You NPCs know that it's like 80 degrees outside and there's playoff football on right?

---

How can we possibly enjoy being outside when there's a bee cult out there taking out conservatives?

---

Jewish bees

---

Charlie loved Israel!
Charlie wasn't being pressured by jewish donors
Charlie didn't even have jewish donors
There was no meeting with Jewish donors.
There was no meeting.
Okay there was a meeting but it wasn't with jewish donors
Okay, there was a meeting with jewish donors, but it was friendly
Text messages from charlie saying the jewish donors were pressuring him, isn't real
Okay, the text messages are real, but it doesn't mean anything
You're an antisemite if you question why a bunch of Jewish donors want to fund an evangelical Christian organization! <--- you are here

---

Still waiting for you to "get into it."

The left absolutely wants to change the subject from "lefties will kill people who they disagree with" to "Erika is a grifter and TPUSA is involved in a conspiracy".

There are definitely some "conservatives" who are willing to buy absolutely any conspiracy theory because they are gullible, and people have checked their humanity at the door to do so. This is pretty straight forward to see.

Phatbob said:

---

The left absolutely wants to change the subject from "lefties will kill people who they disagree with" to "Erika is a grifter and TPUSA is involved in a conspiracy".

There are definitely some "conservatives" who are willing to buy absolutely any conspiracy theory because they are gullible, and people have checked their humanity at the door to do so. This is pretty straight forward to see.

---

This isn't some sort of conspiracy from the left…the right has embraced a large number of conspiracy theorists who have achieved fame thru clicks and will do anything to stay on that kick.


Until we purge them from the group, we are going to be continued to be plagued by this idiocy.

There is also no pushback from anywhere other than anyone on the right who points out that the conspiracy theories are f'n insane. The left is happy to let it ride. There is a reason it is getting pushed through the algorithms.

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Sid Farkas said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'd be glad to get into it.

---

An hour and a half and several posts later…

---

Maybe Candace's fake French assassins got him.

---

or Macron's she-man wife.

---

You NPCs know that it's like 80 degrees outside and there's playoff football on right?

---

How can we possibly enjoy being outside when there's a bee cult out there taking out conservatives?

---

Jewish bees

---

Charlie loved Israel!
Charlie wasn't being pressured by jewish donors
Charlie didn't even have jewish donors
There was no meeting with Jewish donors.
There was no meeting.
Okay there was a meeting but it wasn't with jewish donors
Okay, there was a meeting with jewish donors, but it was friendly
Text messages from charlie saying the jewish donors were pressuring him, isn't real
Okay, the text messages are real, but it doesn't mean anything
You're an antisemite if you question why a bunch of Jewish donors want to fund an evangelical Christian organization! <--- you are here

---

Still waiting for you to "get into it."

---

All of those statements, while humorous, were factually how it played out.

But let's start at the beginning. Do you believe the official FBI story of who killed Charlie and how they did it? Do you believe every detail happened the way they said happened?

(If you're going to answer yes, do you believe that the secret service didn't cover the rooftop in butler, pa, because it was too steep?)

Farmer_J said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Sid Farkas said:

---

J. Walter Weatherman said:

---

GAC06 said:

---

Quote:

---

I'd be glad to get into it.

---

An hour and a half and several posts later…

---

Maybe Candace's fake French assassins got him.

---

or Macron's she-man wife.

---

You NPCs know that it's like 80 degrees outside and there's playoff football on right?

---

How can we possibly enjoy being outside when there's a bee cult out there taking out conservatives?

---

Jewish bees

---

Charlie loved Israel!
Charlie wasn't being pressured by jewish donors
Charlie didn't even have jewish donors
There was no meeting with Jewish donors.
There was no meeting.
Okay there was a meeting but it wasn't with jewish donors
Okay, there was a meeting with jewish donors, but it was friendly
Text messages from charlie saying the jewish donors were pressuring him, isn't real
Okay, the text messages are real, but it doesn't mean anything
You're an antisemite if you question why a bunch of Jewish donors want to fund an evangelical Christian organization! <--- you are here

---

Still waiting for you to "get into it."

---

All of those statements, while humorous, were factually how it played out.

But let's start at the beginning. Do you believe the official FBI story of who killed Charlie and how they did it? Do you believe every detail happened the way they said happened?

(If you're going to answer yes, do you believe that the secret service didn't cover the rooftop in butler, pa, because it was too steep?)

---

Yes.

No. I think they were lazy/complacent and thought the local cops were covering it. Then they came up with a bunch of random excuses afterwards.

Your turn. What do you think is "bs" from the "official story" and what exactly do you think happened?

Agreed. Also, people want to believe in conspiracy theories because their lives are generally boring. So it's much more exciting to think life is a Jason Bourne movie when you're stuck living the same thing every day. Grifters like Candace have latched onto this and use it to get attention and money.

Phatbob said:

---

There is also no pushback from anywhere other than anyone on the right who points out that the conspiracy theories are f'n insane. The left is happy to let it ride. There is a reason it is getting pushed through the algorithms.

---

Bro...this isnt an algorithm thing. The wings have long had an issue w/conspiracy theorists...

Remember, Buckley and Goldwater spent years purging the Birchers, Robert Welch and others from the conservative movement because they were such a drag on trying to win elections.

The right decided to stop gatekeeping a few years ago, and this is what we got...now we gotta purge them.

The Left has their own issues with this and they have completely ignored it...but eventually the DSA/WFP growth is going to run right into the Liberal base.

I'm totally convinced you're a bot now.

Anyone who else want to go on the record and say they believe the trump assassination attempt was just one big misunderstanding?

Quote:

---

All of those statements, while humorous, were factually how it played out.

---

The only reason any of those statements even get uttered is if you start with the presumption of "I bet the Juice had something to do with it! Let's see how I can get the red yarn to tie them in on my evidence board!"

Absolutely nothing of the facts surrounding his death have anything to do with what you or any conspiracy nut can reasonably tie to anything other than the leftist shooter. That is reality. The conspiracy theorists are shoehorning crazy into every possible crack they can.

Farmer_J said:

---

I'm totally convinced you're a bot now.

Anyone who else want to go on the record and say they believe the trump assassination attempt was just one big misunderstanding?

---

So you have no answers to this? It's been a day since you said you'd be happy to get into it but you keep dodging. What happened? Did the Egyptian Air Force get to you too?

Quote:

---

Your turn. What do you think is "bs" from the "official story" and what exactly do you think happened?

---

I'm not disagreeing with you much other than the conspiracy nuts fit into discrediting the right, and it fits into the leftist worldview, which often drives algorithms. I'm not pushing a separate conspiracy, just a tendency of what has been obvious with past behavior of what gets pushed.

Phatbob said:

---

I'm not disagreeing with you much other than the conspiracy nuts fit into discrediting the right, and it fits into the leftist worldview, which often drives algorithms. I'm not pushing a separate conspiracy, just a tendency of what has been obvious with past behavior of what gets pushed.

---

I get what your throwing down...I guess what my critique(response?) is that it feels less about the algorithm (which is a pre-determined formula) than a system which incentivizes behavior based off clicks.

Ie...more extreme you are...the more more clicks you get...the more money you get.

Phatbob said:

---

Quote:

---

All of those statements, while humorous, were factually how it played out.

---

The only reason any of those statements even get uttered is if you start with the presumption of "I bet the Juice had something to do with it! Let's see how I can get the red yarn to tie them in on my evidence board!"

Absolutely nothing of the facts surrounding his death have anything to do with what you or any conspiracy nut can reasonably tie to anything other than the leftist shooter. That is reality. The conspiracy theorists are shoehorning crazy into every possible crack they can.

---

All of those statements are how it played out. We've already been through the whole denial, dissmiss, admission, accusation life cycle.

Who made the supposed statements you're referring to?

Farmer_J said:

---

Phatbob said:

---

Quote:

---

All of those statements, while humorous, were factually how it played out.

---

The only reason any of those statements even get uttered is if you start with the presumption of "I bet the Juice had something to do with it! Let's see how I can get the red yarn to tie them in on my evidence board!"

Absolutely nothing of the facts surrounding his death have anything to do with what you or any conspiracy nut can reasonably tie to anything other than the leftist shooter. That is reality. The conspiracy theorists are shoehorning crazy into every possible crack they can.

---

All of those statements are how it played out. We've already been through the whole denial, dissmiss, admission, accusation life cycle.

---

Again, none of those things have anything to do with anything other than there was a leftist shooter and some conspiracy theorists thought "I bet the Jews had something to do with it!", because they are obsessed, and not based on any actual facts about the shooter.

I can come up with some wild **** about your left pinky toe being involved, in which your surprise in such an insane and stupid theory being taken seriously may contribute to some inconsistencies in your story about said pink toe, but that still doesn't mean your pinky toe had anything to do with it, even if I have come to the conclusion that your "answers" about your left pinky toe are not sufficient to answer my "legitimate" questions.

GAC06 said:

---

Who made the supposed statements you're referring to?

---

They're not "supposed", it's how the whole ordeal went down. Bill ackman was one of the donors. Just like I stated, it was at first denied there was even a meeting and candace was of course called crazy. There was denials from the donors, and from tpusa employees. Candace posted the text messages from Charlie, and within a day or 2 everyone acknowledged that they were real.

Phatbob said:

---

I can come up with some wild **** about your left pinky toe being involved, in which your surprise in such an insane and stupid theory being taken seriously may contribute to some inconsistencies in your story about said pink toe, but that still doesn't mean your pinky toe had anything to do with it, even if I have come to the conclusion that your "answers" about your left pinky toe are not sufficient to answer my "legitimate" questions.

---

Which ones aren't plausible? i just went through one example of a 'crazy conspiracy theory' that was proved true.

Next, let's take that the FBI said he was shot with a 30.06. I've shot a lot of animals with 30 caliber rifles over my life. There is no way in my experience he was shot in the neck with a 30.06. You have to do some crazy mental gymnastics to create the magic bullet scenario.

As a bonus, Andrew Klovet immediately posted that he talked to the surgeon and the surgeon told him charlie kirk's neck bones were so healthy and strong they stopped the bullet. First of all, it's a very odd thing to release immediately. It feels like he's trying to compensate for something. Secondly, there's no proof the surgeon told him anything.

For all the npcs, these questions don't "prove" anything - but they're reasonable questions. Any good detective would be questioning this.

You still have not adequately explained where your left pinky toe was on that day. Any good detective would be asking about it

Phatbob said:

---

You still have not adequately explained where your left pinky toe was on that day. Any good detective would be asking about it

---

You really think you're making a good point with this pinky toe thing don't you?

Farmer_J said:

---

Phatbob said:

---

I can come up with some wild **** about your left pinky toe being involved, in which your surprise in such an insane and stupid theory being taken seriously may contribute to some inconsistencies in your story about said pink toe, but that still doesn't mean your pinky toe had anything to do with it, even if I have come to the conclusion that your "answers" about your left pinky toe are not sufficient to answer my "legitimate" questions.

---

Which ones aren't plausible? i just went through one example of a 'crazy conspiracy theory' that was proved true.

Next, let's take that the FBI said he was shot with a 30.06. I've shot a lot of animals with 30 caliber rifles over my life. There is no way in my experience he was shot in the neck with a 30.06. You have to do some crazy mental gymnastics to create the magic bullet scenario.

As a bonus, Andrew Klovet immediately posted that he talked to the surgeon and the surgeon told him charlie kirk's neck bones were so healthy and strong they stopped the bullet. First of all, it's a very odd thing to release immediately. It feels like he's trying to compensate for something. Secondly, there's no proof the surgeon told him anything.

For all the npcs, these questions don't "prove" anything - but they're reasonable questions. Any good detective would be questioning this.

---

Oh god...

You're going to go straight to the ballistics stuff like all the JFK conspiracy theorists go.

Well, have fun with that.




BTW, those questions are only reasonable to someone that needs a lot of mental help...

HoustonAg2106 said:

---

Phatbob said:

---

You still have not adequately explained where your left pinky toe was on that day. Any good detective would be asking about it

---

You really think you're making a good point with this pinky toe thing don't you?

---

Actually, he is...

But, if you don't understand why, then we know why you believe this conspiracy theory stuff...

Silent For Too Long said:

---

Malibu said:

---

I'm struggle to find the proof that 'Hate for Erika Kirk got out of control' based on a YouTuber that said nasty stuff about her getting 10k views.

---

I think the fact that we have glue sniffers on this very thread critiquing whether or not a woman who watched her husband get shot in the neck and bleed out 5 ****ing months ago is grieving properly is proof enough that the algorithm is working.

Just some embarrassingly terrible takes on this thread.

---

I think it's just standard celebrity gossip/hate, but in the flimsy guise of political discourse.

Ag with kids said:

---

Farmer_J said:

---

Phatbob said:

---

I can come up with some wild **** about your left pinky toe being involved, in which your surprise in such an insane and stupid theory being taken seriously may contribute to some inconsistencies in your story about said pink toe, but that still doesn't mean your pinky toe had anything to do with it, even if I have come to the conclusion that your "answers" about your left pinky toe are not sufficient to answer my "legitimate" questions.

---

Which ones aren't plausible? i just went through one example of a 'crazy conspiracy theory' that was proved true.

Next, let's take that the FBI said he was shot with a 30.06. I've shot a lot of animals with 30 caliber rifles over my life. There is no way in my experience he was shot in the neck with a 30.06. You have to do some crazy mental gymnastics to create the magic bullet scenario.

As a bonus, Andrew Klovet immediately posted that he talked to the surgeon and the surgeon told him charlie kirk's neck bones were so healthy and strong they stopped the bullet. First of all, it's a very odd thing to release immediately. It feels like he's trying to compensate for something. Secondly, there's no proof the surgeon told him anything.

For all the npcs, these questions don't "prove" anything - but they're reasonable questions. Any good detective would be questioning this.

---

Oh god...

You're going to go straight to the ballistics stuff like all the JFK conspiracy theorists go.

Well, have fun with that.




BTW, those questions are only reasonable to someone that needs a lot of mental help...

---

No, i've hunted a lot and shot a lot of animals. But hey really good argument.

Ag with kids said:

---

HoustonAg2106 said:

---

Phatbob said:

---

You still have not adequately explained where your left pinky toe was on that day. Any good detective would be asking about it

---

You really think you're making a good point with this pinky toe thing don't you?

---

Actually, he is...

But, if you don't understand why, then we know why you believe this conspiracy theory stuff...

---

You know how intellectual lazy it is to call someone a conspiracy theorist?