shiftyandquick said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

MAGA is not far right.

---

agreed. It is actually authoritarian and populist and wildly corrupt, with notions of command economy and oligarchy.

---

So you're saying the camps are coming soon?

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

MAGA is not far right.

---

agreed. It is actually authoritarian and populist and wildly corrupt, with notions of command economy and oligarchy.

---

So you're saying the camps are coming soon?

---

Soylent Ghey?!

Stopped reading at "his own Christianity". His own Christianity is not Christianity at all. He is a fraud, his faith is an act, and a bad act at that.

BigRobSA said:

---

Just imagine the reparations for the Euros taken by the Barbary pirates and enslaved, which is multitudes more than Africans that were enslaved and brought here.

---

What are you talking about? Didn't you know that whites in America are the only people that ever enslaved anybody?

shiftyandquick said:

---

richardag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

Doesn't know anything about Crockett. Everyone knows who Crockett is. Your candidate I have no idea, but then again I don't follow Dems other than for comic relief.

Tell us your a troll without saying it.

---

…,,,
I don't follow far right media.
,,,…,,,

---

Interesting, that begs the question; to what media do you listen?

---

I scan Drudge for headlines. CNN website. NYTimes website (have subscription). I occasionally check out Dallas Morning News. Whatever comes up on my FB feed (and the algorithm feeds me a lot of anti-MAGA stuff, as you can imagine). I don't watch very much cable news at all. A tiny bit of CNN. Radio, occasional NPR when the Ticket goes to commercial or is boring. For a short time I listened to BBC podcast. I have a free subscription to WSJ, but I don't go there much at all, unless an aggregator like Drudge links to there.

---

So...do you actually *read* any of them?

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

---

BigRobSA said:

---

Just imagine the reparations for the Euros taken by the Barbary pirates and enslaved, which is multitudes more than Africans that were enslaved and brought here.

---

What are you talking about? Didn't you know that whites in America are the only people that ever enslaved anybody?

---

Literally started in 1619!

talarico has a puncher's chance against paxton, but none against cornyn. crockett would lose in a landslide to either.

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

BigRobSA said:

---

Talarico vs Jasmine?

LOLtards, the both of them. The peanuts in my **** are smarter.

---

Those peanut chunks are Stephen Hawking compared to Crockett

shiftyandquick said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

---

I just don't see how one can be so critical of Trump while failing to recognize that the corruption and malfeasance of the Democrat party is a much greater threat, since they have virtually zero oversight.

The media will not hold Democrats accountable
The federal judiciary and bureaucracy will not hold Democrats accountable
Academics do not hold Democrats accountable
DC and other metro juries will not hold Democrats accountable
Popular culture does not hold Democrats accountable
Democrat voters are brainwashed zombies that don't even realize their politicians need to be held accountable

Say what you will about Republicans and some of your criticisms will be valid, but they are scrutinized to the Nth degree compared to Democrats.

Democrats know they can get away with just about anything. No institution will hold them accountable and their voters will remain completely clueless about their corruption and malfeasance because their propaganda machine will ignore Democrat corruption/malfeasance and paint any conservative media as quackery.

For example, most liberals will argue that CNN and MSNBC is somehow lesser propaganda than Fox News. I can't stand any of them, but they're all the same ****, just different flavors. The fact that liberals are seemingly incapable of recognizing a simple truth, should tell you all you need to know.

The American, Canadian and European left are some of the most brainwashed people on the planet. Even North Korean leadership is likely in awe at the effectiveness of Western left wing propaganda.

shiftyandquick said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

---

Trump is gone in 2 years. This election will sit for 6. Cornyn doesn't like Trump and that's obvious so not sure what kissing his ring is or why it's even relevant in this instance.

You basically just want to vote a democrat because you support their policies. And that's plain to all.

aggieforester05 said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

---

I just don't see how one can be so critical of Trump while failing to recognize that the corruption and malfeasance of the Democrat party is a much greater threat, since they have virtually zero oversight.

The media will not hold Democrats accountable
The federal judiciary and bureaucracy will not hold Democrats accountable
Academics do not hold Democrats accountable
DC and other metro juries will not hold Democrats accountable
Popular culture does not hold Democrats accountable
Democrat voters are brainwashed zombies that don't even realize their politicians need to be held accountable

Say what you will about Republicans and some of your criticisms will be valid, but they are scrutinized to the Nth degree compared to Democrats.

Democrats know they can get away with just about anything. No institution will hold them accountable and their voters will remain completely clueless about their corruption and malfeasance because their propaganda machine will ignore Democrat corruption/malfeasance and paint any conservative media as quackery.

For example, most liberals will argue that CNN and MSNBC is somehow lesser propaganda than Fox News. I can't stand any of them, but they're all the same ****, just different flavors. The fact that liberals are seemingly incapable of recognizing a simple truth, should tell you all you need to know.

The American, Canadian and European left are some of the most brainwashed people on the planet. Even North Korean leadership is likely in awe at the effectiveness of Western left wing propaganda.

---

I believe what Trump has done and does is more of an existential threat to the US and the US Constitution than the Democrats. Because I hate Trump doesn't mean I like Chuck Schumer. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

For example, Trump says that elections are invalid all the time. With zero evidence. That undermines the rule of law in the United States. I could give you 1000 other examples of things like this. But since you don't agree with them, I won't bother to spend more time on it.

shiftyandquick said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

Doesn't know anything about Crockett. Everyone knows who Crockett is. Your candidate I have no idea, but then again I don't follow Dems other than for comic relief.

Tell us your a troll without saying it.

---

The only place I hear about Crockett is here on Texags. And I haven't paid attention to those threads.

Why? The reason I suspect is that the far right media uses her as a foil. So if you follow far right media, then you've seen a lot about her. Whereas the left/centrist media does not talk about her very much at all.

I don't follow far right media.

Another example is this: how come so many MAGA people here claimed to have never heard of Fuentes? I had seen LOTS of stuff on Fuentes prior to Kirk's death. Because the left/centrists use Fuentes as a foil and warn about the danger of his ideology. Whereas right wing media (until recently) pretended like he didn't exist, and certainly didn't warn their consumers about him.

---

You can't tell me you don't know much about Crockett other than what you see on this site especially if you follow the mainstream media and all the other left-leaning garbage. She is all over the news taking away good oxygen in the room she is in.

shiftyandquick said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

---

I just don't see how one can be so critical of Trump while failing to recognize that the corruption and malfeasance of the Democrat party is a much greater threat, since they have virtually zero oversight.

The media will not hold Democrats accountable
The federal judiciary and bureaucracy will not hold Democrats accountable
Academics do not hold Democrats accountable
DC and other metro juries will not hold Democrats accountable
Popular culture does not hold Democrats accountable
Democrat voters are brainwashed zombies that don't even realize their politicians need to be held accountable

Say what you will about Republicans and some of your criticisms will be valid, but they are scrutinized to the Nth degree compared to Democrats.

Democrats know they can get away with just about anything. No institution will hold them accountable and their voters will remain completely clueless about their corruption and malfeasance because their propaganda machine will ignore Democrat corruption/malfeasance and paint any conservative media as quackery.

For example, most liberals will argue that CNN and MSNBC is somehow lesser propaganda than Fox News. I can't stand any of them, but they're all the same ****, just different flavors. The fact that liberals are seemingly incapable of recognizing a simple truth, should tell you all you need to know.

The American, Canadian and European left are some of the most brainwashed people on the planet. Even North Korean leadership is likely in awe at the effectiveness of Western left wing propaganda.

---

I believe what Trump has done and does is more of an existential threat to the US and the US Constitution than the Democrats. Because I hate Trump doesn't mean I like Chuck Schumer. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

For example, Trump says that elections are invalid all the time. With zero evidence. That undermines the rule of law in the United States. I could give you 1000 other examples of things like this. But since you don't agree with them, I won't bother to spend more time on it.

---

And again, Trump is gone in two years. It's time you start thinking about policy and shelve the TDS

shiftyandquick said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

---

I just don't see how one can be so critical of Trump while failing to recognize that the corruption and malfeasance of the Democrat party is a much greater threat, since they have virtually zero oversight.

The media will not hold Democrats accountable
The federal judiciary and bureaucracy will not hold Democrats accountable
Academics do not hold Democrats accountable
DC and other metro juries will not hold Democrats accountable
Popular culture does not hold Democrats accountable
Democrat voters are brainwashed zombies that don't even realize their politicians need to be held accountable

Say what you will about Republicans and some of your criticisms will be valid, but they are scrutinized to the Nth degree compared to Democrats.

Democrats know they can get away with just about anything. No institution will hold them accountable and their voters will remain completely clueless about their corruption and malfeasance because their propaganda machine will ignore Democrat corruption/malfeasance and paint any conservative media as quackery.

For example, most liberals will argue that CNN and MSNBC is somehow lesser propaganda than Fox News. I can't stand any of them, but they're all the same ****, just different flavors. The fact that liberals are seemingly incapable of recognizing a simple truth, should tell you all you need to know.

The American, Canadian and European left are some of the most brainwashed people on the planet. Even North Korean leadership is likely in awe at the effectiveness of Western left wing propaganda.

---

I believe what Trump has done and does is more of an existential threat to the US and the US Constitution than the Democrats. Because I hate Trump doesn't mean I like Chuck Schumer. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

For example, Trump says that elections are invalid all the time. With zero evidence. That undermines the rule of law in the United States. I could give you 1000 other examples of things like this. But since you don't agree with them, I won't bother to spend more time on it.

---

Trump is gone in a few years. Unlike the democrat party, who you support, that are trying to bring socialism and communism to the US.

In addition, you aren't just voting against Trump. You're going out of your way to pump Talaricos character and bonafides. That's not the voice of someone casting a vote against Trump.

You're not voting against Trump. You're voting for Talarico and it's fooling no one. As are your claims of being a "Reagan republican".

Why is it so hard to just say you're a liberal Democrat? Why the play the deception?

shiftyandquick said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

Doesn't know anything about Crockett. Everyone knows who Crockett is. Your candidate I have no idea, but then again I don't follow Dems other than for comic relief.

Tell us your a troll without saying it.

---

The only place I hear about Crockett is here on Texags. And I haven't paid attention to those threads.

Why? The reason I suspect is that the far right media uses her as a foil. So if you follow far right media, then you've seen a lot about her. Whereas the left/centrist media does not talk about her very much at all.

I don't follow far right media.

Another example is this: how come so many MAGA people here claimed to have never heard of Fuentes? I had seen LOTS of stuff on Fuentes prior to Kirk's death. Because the left/centrists use Fuentes as a foil and warn about the danger of his ideology. Whereas right wing media (until recently) pretended like he didn't exist, and certainly didn't warn their consumers about him.

---

Crockett is only talked about on far right media? Uhhhh I guess you missed all of the interviews she's done on MSNBC and CNN for the last year. To think that who you call the "far right media" uses her as a foil is hilarious. She does that everytime she opens her mouth. She literally said on a podcast that she doesn't feel like black people should be taxed because of reparations that they're owed.

You're a prime example as to why our country is in the position it is in right now. You pay zero attention to who you're voting for and only look for the D next to her name. She has little to no chance of winning, but if she somehow did, that would be very very bad for Texas.

Your Fuentes example is insane. He's a talking head who has a bunch of crazy ideologies, not an elected member of Congress. Huge difference there bub. The stuff Jasmine is introducing and voting for in the House absolutely affects American citizens and Texans.

shiftyandquick said:

---

DallasAg 94 said:

---

We should have some awareness of the 435 US HoRs.

---

That's funny. Most of them are completely anonymous. You have the leadership, and then mostly the people who make a big stink and self-promote and get their names out there.

---

Next I'm suire you're gonna try and tell us that you've never heard of AOC and Ilhan Omar. If I was a Democrat, I probably wouldn't claim these America hating lunatics either.

shiftyandquick said:

---

richardag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

Doesn't know anything about Crockett. Everyone knows who Crockett is. Your candidate I have no idea, but then again I don't follow Dems other than for comic relief.

Tell us your a troll without saying it.

---

…,,,
I don't follow far right media.
,,,…,,,

---

Interesting, that begs the question; to what media do you listen?

---

I scan Drudge for headlines. CNN website. NYTimes website (have subscription). I occasionally check out Dallas Morning News. Whatever comes up on my FB feed (and the algorithm feeds me a lot of anti-MAGA stuff, as you can imagine). I don't watch very much cable news at all. A tiny bit of CNN. Radio, occasional NPR when the Ticket goes to commercial or is boring. For a short time I listened to BBC podcast. I have a free subscription to WSJ, but I don't go there much at all, unless an aggregator like Drudge links to there.

---

You check out the Dallas Morning News, yet claim to not know who Jasmine Crockett is, a member of the HoR IN DALLAS? Tell us you're lying without telling us......

David_Puddy said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

richardag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

Doesn't know anything about Crockett. Everyone knows who Crockett is. Your candidate I have no idea, but then again I don't follow Dems other than for comic relief.

Tell us your a troll without saying it.

---

…,,,
I don't follow far right media.
,,,…,,,

---

Interesting, that begs the question; to what media do you listen?

---

I scan Drudge for headlines. CNN website. NYTimes website (have subscription). I occasionally check out Dallas Morning News. Whatever comes up on my FB feed (and the algorithm feeds me a lot of anti-MAGA stuff, as you can imagine). I don't watch very much cable news at all. A tiny bit of CNN. Radio, occasional NPR when the Ticket goes to commercial or is boring. For a short time I listened to BBC podcast. I have a free subscription to WSJ, but I don't go there much at all, unless an aggregator like Drudge links to there.

---

You check out the Dallas Morning News, yet claim to not know who Jasmine Crockett is, a member of the HoR IN DALLAS? Tell us you're lying without telling us......

---

I'd never heard a single snippet of Charlie Kirk before he died. Heard of his name, had a vague idea of what he was about.

No I have never read single article about Crockett in the DMN. To be fair I probably look at DMN twice per month.

shiftyandquick said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

---

I just don't see how one can be so critical of Trump while failing to recognize that the corruption and malfeasance of the Democrat party is a much greater threat, since they have virtually zero oversight.

The media will not hold Democrats accountable
The federal judiciary and bureaucracy will not hold Democrats accountable
Academics do not hold Democrats accountable
DC and other metro juries will not hold Democrats accountable
Popular culture does not hold Democrats accountable
Democrat voters are brainwashed zombies that don't even realize their politicians need to be held accountable

Say what you will about Republicans and some of your criticisms will be valid, but they are scrutinized to the Nth degree compared to Democrats.

Democrats know they can get away with just about anything. No institution will hold them accountable and their voters will remain completely clueless about their corruption and malfeasance because their propaganda machine will ignore Democrat corruption/malfeasance and paint any conservative media as quackery.

For example, most liberals will argue that CNN and MSNBC is somehow lesser propaganda than Fox News. I can't stand any of them, but they're all the same ****, just different flavors. The fact that liberals are seemingly incapable of recognizing a simple truth, should tell you all you need to know.

The American, Canadian and European left are some of the most brainwashed people on the planet. Even North Korean leadership is likely in awe at the effectiveness of Western left wing propaganda.

---

I believe what Trump has done and does is more of an existential threat to the US and the US Constitution than the Democrats. Because I hate Trump doesn't mean I like Chuck Schumer. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

For example, Trump says that elections are invalid all the time. With zero evidence. That undermines the rule of law in the United States. I could give you 1000 other examples of things like this. But since you don't agree with them, I won't bother to spend more time on it.

---

Ah, yes. The "invalid election" arguments. No other politician has done that.

Oh wait...

You didn't know who Charlie Kirk was or Jasmine Crockett is but know all about Talarico? LOL.....nobody here believes that bub.

BigRobSA said:

---

DrEvazanPhD said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

MAGA is not far right.

---

agreed. It is actually authoritarian and populist and wildly corrupt, with notions of command economy and oligarchy.

---

So you're saying the camps are coming soon?

---

Soylent Ghey?!

---

Soylent Rainbow!

shiftyandquick said:

---

Another example is this: how come so many MAGA people here claimed to have never heard of Fuentes? I had seen LOTS of stuff on Fuentes prior to Kirk's death. Because the left/centrists use Fuentes as a foil and warn about the danger of his ideology. Whereas right wing media (until recently) pretended like he didn't exist, and certainly didn't warn their consumers about him.

---

27 year old podcaster who began his podcasting career from his parents basement and hasn't made it very far since

being compared to

A Texas House Rep, later a twice elected US Congressman who spoke at the DNC

You're saying that a Republican not knowing who Nick Fuentes is would be comparable to a Democrat not knowing who Jasmine Crockett is?

shiftyandquick said:

---

I wonder to what extent this caught Talarico off-guard. Of course I have been following Talarico closely. I don't know much of anything about Crockett, other than she has been outspoken, controversial, and pretty far left (correct me if I'm wrong). Which has led to her being a kind of minor star on the far left.

Talarico on the other hand is more centrist, practical, incorporates discussion of religious ethics and his own Christianity. Much more Texas-based, having been a state representative in the state government. A rising star in the Democratic Party in his own right.

It was a little interesting last night to read a FB post asking for money from Talarico in the wake of the Crockett announcement and the need to win the primary against her, and then reading the comments. Many people were saying "I wish I could vote for you both." Or, "you should now run for governor instead." Or, "I was going to send money to you now, but I regret to say that I will now be supporting Crockett." Who knows if these are actually real people or bots or disinformation actors.

A well-fought well-executed primary can make a candidate stronger. However will Talarico now have to hew left in order to win the primary? Or can a more centrist candidate win? The GOP has the same dilemma. Vote for far-right MAGA tainted Paxton, or "moderate MAGA" Cornyn?

My support for Democrats doesn't come from a place of "I love Democrats." It comes from the place of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." I.e. anti-MAGA.

I will definitely be supporting Talarico.

---

…takes a special person to vote democratic these days. I don't even talk with any any more. Crocket is in it to tap into funds and exploit money and power….for doing nothing.

shiftyandquick said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

I will not support any Republican that kisses Trump's ring. I will not support any Republican that aids and abets Trump.

That leaves precious few Republicans whom I could theoretically support. Like maybe Rand Paul. Almost everyone else kisses the ring.

Cornyn dry humps Trump. So no, I won't support Cornyn.

---

I just don't see how one can be so critical of Trump while failing to recognize that the corruption and malfeasance of the Democrat party is a much greater threat, since they have virtually zero oversight.

The media will not hold Democrats accountable
The federal judiciary and bureaucracy will not hold Democrats accountable
Academics do not hold Democrats accountable
DC and other metro juries will not hold Democrats accountable
Popular culture does not hold Democrats accountable
Democrat voters are brainwashed zombies that don't even realize their politicians need to be held accountable

Say what you will about Republicans and some of your criticisms will be valid, but they are scrutinized to the Nth degree compared to Democrats.

Democrats know they can get away with just about anything. No institution will hold them accountable and their voters will remain completely clueless about their corruption and malfeasance because their propaganda machine will ignore Democrat corruption/malfeasance and paint any conservative media as quackery.

For example, most liberals will argue that CNN and MSNBC is somehow lesser propaganda than Fox News. I can't stand any of them, but they're all the same ****, just different flavors. The fact that liberals are seemingly incapable of recognizing a simple truth, should tell you all you need to know.

The American, Canadian and European left are some of the most brainwashed people on the planet. Even North Korean leadership is likely in awe at the effectiveness of Western left wing propaganda.

---

I believe what Trump has done and does is more of an existential threat to the US and the US Constitution than the Democrats. Because I hate Trump doesn't mean I like Chuck Schumer. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

For example, Trump says that elections are invalid all the time. With zero evidence. That undermines the rule of law in the United States. I could give you 1000 other examples of things like this. But since you don't agree with them, I won't bother to spend more time on it.

---

Good choice, I have no doubt at all that you are absolutely wrong. Trump's poorly worded statements being taken out of context by a corrupted and hostile media machine is nowhere near as dangerous as the complete lack of accountability enjoyed by the Democrats.

The Rinos are no better, but at least some of them are being held accountable by voters sending them home.

The scale of Democrat corruption both in size and time is far bigger than any one administration could pull off, no matter how corrupt.

The idea that Trump is a bigger problem than Democrats is purely a fantasy born from Democrat propaganda. Fun fan fiction for the Looney lefty crowd, I'll give you that.


ETA: You're worried about Trump's election claims threatening the rule of law, but not Democrats support of lax voting laws engineered to make organic fraud easier to commit and harder to catch. Why no concern about the latter. The Democrats do not seem interested in eliminating valid concerns about election integrity. Why is that? Rule of law?

Quote:

---

The idea that Trump is a bigger problem than Democrats is purely a fantasy born from Democrat propaganda. Fun fan fiction the Looney lefty crowd, I'll give you that.

---

Takes two to tango - don't forgot about the intellectually lazy striving for cognitive simplicity and moral superiority by selectively subjecting candidates to overly specific litmus tests.

For many the only perfect candidate they would ever find is themselves and they're too lazy to actually step up and do it.

Teslag said:

---

Asking again. For the 3rd time.

Cornyn is not maga or far right. He likely won't be supported by Trump over Paxton.

As a self professed Reagan Republican would you supporter Cornyn over Talarico?

---

Trump is in a difficult position there. He like Paxton better, but Cornyn is high in the Senate leadership and could cause problems for Trump if he picks a fight with Cornyn for the primary. I think Trump will sit the primary out on this one because he doesn't need more enemies in the Senate.

shiftyandquick said:

---

richardag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

Doesn't know anything about Crockett. Everyone knows who Crockett is. Your candidate I have no idea, but then again I don't follow Dems other than for comic relief.

Tell us your a troll without saying it.

---

…,,,
I don't follow far right media.
,,,…,,,

---

Interesting, that begs the question; to what media do you listen?

---

I scan Drudge for headlines. CNN website. NYTimes website (have subscription). I occasionally check out Dallas Morning News. Whatever comes up on my FB feed (and the algorithm feeds me a lot of anti-MAGA stuff, as you can imagine). I don't watch very much cable news at all. A tiny bit of CNN. Radio, occasional NPR when the Ticket goes to commercial or is boring. For a short time I listened to BBC podcast. I have a free subscription to WSJ, but I don't go there much at all, unless an aggregator like Drudge links to there.

---

Thanks. Not a fan of CNN, NYTimes, NPR & BBC.
You didn't ask but I listen to First, Newsmax, and Fox for news, and then just for laughs at the BS ABC propaganda. Links found on this website. During walks podcasts by Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro and David Hanson.
edit for clarity

shiftyandquick said:

---

richardag said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

austinAG90 said:

---

Doesn't know anything about Crockett. Everyone knows who Crockett is. Your candidate I have no idea, but then again I don't follow Dems other than for comic relief.

Tell us your a troll without saying it.

---

…,,,
I don't follow far right media.
,,,…,,,

---

Interesting, that begs the question; to what media do you listen?

---

I scan Drudge for headlines. CNN website. NYTimes website (have subscription). I occasionally check out Dallas Morning News. Whatever comes up on my FB feed (and the algorithm feeds me a lot of anti-MAGA stuff, as you can imagine). I don't watch very much cable news at all. A tiny bit of CNN. Radio, occasional NPR when the Ticket goes to commercial or is boring. For a short time I listened to BBC podcast. I have a free subscription to WSJ, but I don't go there much at all, unless an aggregator like Drudge links to there.

---

You should give Instapundit a try. Drudge is trash ever since he sold it to liberals before the 2020 election. The rest of your sources are pretty hardcore left, with CNN being the closest to the middle. You will have a different perspective on a lot of topics if you see the parts of the story that CNN and NYT aren't willing to tell you.

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

No kidding. He is apparently shifty and quick when doing any sort of research on the guy.

---

Well he admittedly "doesn't know much about Crockett", one of the biggest grifter, fake persona, and race baiter in the party. So there's that.

---

he made that up - anyone who spend all his time trolling the politics board, knows damn well who Crockett is

Anybody who can string two syllables together is smarter than Fake James. Crockett is an idiot and still way smarter than Talarico.

Logos Stick said:

---

MAGA is not far right.

---

What about ULTRA MAGA?

Just want to be sure I'm right enough.

YouBet said:

---

captkirk said:

---

TexAgs91 said:

---

For dems, insanity always wins over logic

---

Rep. Crockett proposes no taxes for black people

pic.twitter.com/DL9HRnXQ5e

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) December 8, 2025

---

I'm good with that and in return they don't get to vote in any elections.

---

Agreed. No one that doesn't actually contribute shouldn't be voting.