So you support people in the legislative branch stepping way out of line to undermine the Commander in Chief?

Ag with kids said:

---

richardag said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

And, like always, I got learned something new by ya, Mama Hawg.

As for Mark, if he did something he wasn't supposed to do and is going to be held accountable, then so be it. That's life in the real world.

For anyone to be mad that he's being called out on it and going to be held accountable for it better not have been thrilled when Trump had all that happened to him with all that did happen to him.

There are enough (all of them if we're being honest) hypocrites in DC. It's long overdue for their supporters to stop acting like sycophants and start acting like adults and hold their own to account.

Again, thanks for the edumication.

---

You are welcome. The UCMJ is a completely different animal than statutory criminal law. It is more a Code of Conduct for military members (and their families as active duty are held responsible for the conduct of their dependents) that is 24/7/365 not just work related.

Even first amendment rights are curtailed in that you can say what you want but not when active and in uniform.

---

When my dad was stationed overseas the crimes committed by their son resulted in the family being sent back to the US. Indeed the Code of Conduct was followed in the early 1960s.

---

WTF did you do, Richard????

---

Enjoyed not having the criminal in our high school causing trouble.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

Or will they? Optics are bad if they do dismiss the FBI out of hand. Arrogance OTOH is off of the charts.

---

Never talk to the FBI, ever. No good can come of it. I thought we learned that with the Michael Flynn situation.

Will there be marshals at the court-martial?

aggieforester05 said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Game on?

Uh-oh! https://t.co/fxsysbHZah

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) November 25, 2025

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

The only way they can get out of this is to lie to the FBI about their intent, which is also a crime. That's what they'll do, because Democrats are pathological liars with no ethical boundaries.

They also know they only need one left wing juror to get them out of any felony and since all of these cases will be tried in urban liberal enclaves, they can do whatever they want with impunity. Hopefully this at least has severe personal financial consequences.

---

Which is why they won't talk to the FBI. Even if you did nothing wrong, if you lie to them about damn near anything, it can create bad problems for you.

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

Or will they? Optics are bad if they do dismiss the FBI out of hand. Arrogance OTOH is off of the charts.

---

Never talk to the FBI, ever. No good can come of it. I thought we learned that with the Michael Flynn situation.

---

They can insist on having their legal counsel present. Even Hillary couldn't stiff arm the FBI forever.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

Nah. We are way past that point.

---

You can always assert your right to remain silent. What's the FBI going to do? Beat the information out of them?

You can also just flat tell them no. You should know this.

Nothing else to smell in Arizona I guess.

HTownAg98 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

Nah. We are way past that point.

---

You can always assert your right to remain silent. What's the FBI going to do? Beat the information out of them?

---

Bring back the 1950's FBI. those guys knew how to get information.

HTownAg98 said:

---

You can also just flat tell them no. You should know this.

---

Not what I said. There are political optics here since they are all elected officials. Also note. who responded to that tweet, Harmeet Dillon. There is more at play here.

They could also be looking at it knowing there's a clown show going on now, and they're not going to talk to anyone. Plus, I doubt anyone on the left is going to care that they refused to talk to the FBI.

GAC06 said:

---

Will there be marshals at the court-martial?

---

Spelling corrected

HTownAg98 said:

---

They could also be looking at it knowing there's a clown show going on now, and they're not going to talk to anyone. Plus, I doubt anyone on the left is going to care that they refused to talk to the FBI.

---

Would they care if they were to ignore a grand jury subpoena too? Want to give Harmeet a reason to come after them?

Really all of them, especially Kelly need to shut up about this and get it out of the news cycle. Stop poking their heads up. Let it drop off of the radar. Refusing to cooperate, with counsel present just keeps the subject in the news.

That is not what I said at all and you know it, or perhaps you are ignorant of the UCMJ. It's all just showboating.

ord89 said:

---

This thread sort of shows you why what they did with that video was so dangerous.

Every military member knows that they are not required to follow unlawful orders, so the video was completely unnecessary.

Kelly, for sure, knew better. Completely shamed himself and his service in my opinion. I have no respect for him. Zero.

---

Yet, you have posters on here that would follow Kelly off a mountain.

This is getting worse and worse, news cycle wise.

🚨 JUST IN: Democrats who served in the military and support sedition against President Trump are now saying SecWar Pete Hegseth's Pentagon "better be prepared to recall ALL OF US" if they recall Mark Kelly for a court-martial.

YOUR TERMS ARE ACCEPTABLE. pic.twitter.com/vMgDtbRtPL

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) November 25, 2025

These people are not too smart.

Also this guy (Language warning.)

Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) tells Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, “F*** you.”

This was after Gallego drops other F-bombs in response to Hegseth opening a Pentagon investigation into seditious Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) for “serious allegations of misconduct.”

(rubengallegoaz on TT) pic.twitter.com/rQ6mrgGD94

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) November 25, 2025

SMH dumb.

Quote:

---

Yet, you have posters on here that would follow Kelly off a mountain.

---

Not just here. See my post right below yours.

usmcbrooks said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Game on?

Uh-oh! https://t.co/fxsysbHZah

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) November 25, 2025

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

So....above the law then?

---

Explain how it's "above the law" to not talk to law enforcement.

richardag said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Game on?

Uh-oh! https://t.co/fxsysbHZah

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) November 25, 2025

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

The only way they can get out of this is to lie to the FBI about their intent, which is also a crime. That's what they'll do, because Democrats are pathological liars with no ethical boundaries.

They also know they only need one left wing juror to get them out of any felony and since all of these cases will be tried in urban liberal enclaves, they can do whatever they want with impunity. Hopefully this at least has severe personal financial consequences.

---

Court Marshals Maritals Martials have juries?

edit spelling

---

The FBI scheduling interviews with these seditionists has nothing to do with a potential court-martial for Kelly.

Quote:

---

The FBI scheduling interviews with these seditionists have nothing to do with a potential court-martial for Kelly.

---

Not necessarily. Kelly lies to the FBI, gets indicted? That alone could be grounds for a potential court martial. It is not considered double jeopardy, is my understanding.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Yet, you have posters on here that would follow Kelly off a mountain.

---

Not just here. See my post right below yours.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

The FBI scheduling interviews with these seditionists have nothing to do with a potential court-martial for Kelly.

---

Not necessarily. Kelly lies to the FBI, gets indicted? That alone could be grounds for a potential court martial. It is not considered double jeopardy, is my understanding.

---

I was under the assumption that these FBI interviews are for federal crimes committed as a civilian and that the JAG would have their own investigative teams for any violations of the USCMJ? The latter would of course only apply to Kelly. You think these FBI interviews have anything to do with the DOW investigation into Kelly's violations of the USCMJ?

Quote:

---

I was under the assumption that these FBI interviews are for federal crimes committed as a civilian and that the JAG would have their own investigative teams for any violations of the USCMJ? The latter would of course only apply to Kelly. You think these FBI interviews have anything to do with the DOW investigation into Kelly's violations of the USCMJ?

---

They will be on separate tracks of course but what happens in a federal investigation will be noted in an investigation under UCMJ too.

Remember UCMJ is a Code of Conduct which is different than statutory criminal law. Not the same animal at all although they can intersect, at times.

Hegseth going in dry

HTownAg98 said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Game on?

Uh-oh! https://t.co/fxsysbHZah

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) November 25, 2025

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

So....above the law then?

---

Explain how it's "above the law" to not talk to law enforcement.

---

Do you really need to me to explain this to you?

HTownAg98 said:

---

They could also be looking at it knowing there's a clown show going on now, and they're not going to talk to anyone. Plus, I doubt anyone on the left is going to care that they refused to talk to the FBI.

---

Now that is rich! Did you type that with a straight face?

aggieforester05 said:

---

richardag said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Game on?

Uh-oh! https://t.co/fxsysbHZah

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) November 25, 2025

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

The only way they can get out of this is to lie to the FBI about their intent, which is also a crime. That's what they'll do, because Democrats are pathological liars with no ethical boundaries.

They also know they only need one left wing juror to get them out of any felony and since all of these cases will be tried in urban liberal enclaves, they can do whatever they want with impunity. Hopefully this at least has severe personal financial consequences.

---

Court Marshals Maritals Martials have juries?

edit spelling

---

The FBI scheduling interviews with these seditionists has nothing to do with a potential court-martial for Kelly.

---

Are you thinking this is another one of those where a show of force is made, only for it to end up being nothing more than a nothing burger that everyone involved knew it would be when it all began?

usmcbrooks said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

usmcbrooks said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Game on?

Uh-oh! https://t.co/fxsysbHZah

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) November 25, 2025

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

So....above the law then?

---

Explain how it's "above the law" to not talk to law enforcement.

---

Do you really need to me to explain this to you?

---

Then yes, because if there's something different that I'm not aware of, they have the same rights as a regular citizen to remain silent. If this is an ethics committee issue, then that's different. If this has to do with military issues, I don't know what those are.

Quote:

---

Are you thinking this is another one of those where a show of force is made, only for it to end up being nothing more than a nothing burger that everyone involved knew it would be when it all began?

---

Don't know at this point.

No Spin Ag said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

richardag said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Game on?

Uh-oh! https://t.co/fxsysbHZah

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@HarmeetKDhillon) November 25, 2025

---

Oh noes! Scheduling interviews where the people they want to interview can (and should) tell the FBI to go pound sand.

---

The only way they can get out of this is to lie to the FBI about their intent, which is also a crime. That's what they'll do, because Democrats are pathological liars with no ethical boundaries.

They also know they only need one left wing juror to get them out of any felony and since all of these cases will be tried in urban liberal enclaves, they can do whatever they want with impunity. Hopefully this at least has severe personal financial consequences.

---

Court Marshals Maritals Martials have juries?

edit spelling

---

The FBI scheduling interviews with these seditionists has nothing to do with a potential court-martial for Kelly.

---

Are you thinking this is another one of those where a show of force is made, only for it to end up being nothing more than a nothing burger that everyone involved knew it would be when it all began?

---

We were discussing FBI interviews (which implies federal crimes) and I basically stated that left wing juries will get these people off. Richard asked me if court-martials have juries, which is irrelevant when discussing FBI interviewing all six of the seditionists about potential violations of federal crime. I'm not sure why.

It's not a nothing burger, these people knew what they were doing and should be severely punished for their reckless crimes. That being said, probably won't happen, because Democrats are not held to same standards as Republicans by the media, federal law enforcement, or juries in Democrat enclaves. Just because they won't be held accountable doesn't mean that their crimes should be ignored. An attempt to hold them accountable should be executed to the full extent of the law.

Which one of you degenerate Aggies was this?