Bill Gates makes major climate change reversal after years of doomerism: ....

5,202 Views | 47 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Sooper Jeenyus
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Come on in, Bill! The water's fine! Thanks for realizing (and telling us) the world isn't going to end because of climate change.


https://nypost.com/2025/10/28/us-news/bill-gates-makes-major-climate-change-reversal-after-years-of-doomerism/
Quote:

Bill Gates makes major climate change reversal after years of doomerism: 'People will be able to live and thrive'
By Chris Nesi Published Oct. 28, 2025, 11:26 a.m. ET

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who has spent more than a decade warning that the world was on the brink of unimaginable peril due to rising global temperatures, now says climate change "will not lead to humanity's demise" in a stunning reversal.

Gates, 70, who has sunk billions of his vast fortune into initiatives ostensibly meant to combat global warming, penned a lengthy blog post this week urging a shift away from the "doomsday outlook" many climate activists have adopted to terrify nonbelievers into seeing things their way.

"Although climate change will have serious consequences particularly for people in the poorest countries it will not lead to humanity's demise," he wrote. "People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future."....

.....

....Gates, 70, who has sunk billions of his vast fortune into initiatives ostensibly meant to combat global warming, penned a lengthy blog post this week urging a shift away from the "doomsday outlook" many climate activists have adopted to terrify nonbelievers into seeing things their way....

.....

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So every few years he releases a new version making the old version obsolete? Makes sense.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AI and Datacenters need more power than windmills and solar can provide.

This mean Microsoft, Apple and all the other green energy tech giants are going to put climate 'science' on the back burner or their profits will erode.

As usual, money makes the world go around.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why are we even listening to this guy as any type of scientific authority? BC he is rich?
Pooh-ah95_ESL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We weren't listening to your bad advice before, and will continue not to listen to it now. Thanks for the input Bill.
Vitani
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone who is invested in the future of AI cannot be all in on climate change. The energy requirements to progress those tools cannot be met with green energy. Remember it was Microsoft that purchased the Three Mile Island facility. I know nuclear is clean energy but can you imagine a climate zealot doing that ten years ago?
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agracer said:

AI and Datacenters need more power than windmills and solar can provide.

This mean Microsoft, Apple and all the other green energy tech giants are going to put climate 'science' on the back burner or their profits will erode.

As usual, money makes the world go around.


100% this.

FF and Nuclear is the only option that can fuel the energy intense demands of AI data centers these companies have so look for them to toss the GW talking points and even start backing studies that show nuclear is safe (which it is) to get the energy production they need
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's over, libs
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agracer said:

AI and Datacenters need more power than windmills and solar can provide.

This mean Microsoft, Apple and all the other green energy tech giants are going to put climate 'science' on the back burner or their profits will
This is probably the angle. There definitely is one.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The leftist are shifting their focus from Climate Change to AI as a means to control the population. They know they've pushed the climate change narrative about as far as they can and it has failed. Now they need another way to control people, and AI offers the best opportunity.

They also know AI requires huge amounts of energy to function, and what do you know? All that anti-nuclear, anti fossil fuel mumbo jumbo isn't so important after all.

Never ever trust the leftists. They always have an ulterior motive.
CowPieAndFries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now do wokeism.
Formerly CowPieAndFries
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This thread was prophetic.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3570245
TheCurl84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not enough. I want an apology. And retribution. Make the check payable to "TheCurl84".
Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waffledynamics said:

This thread was prophetic.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3570245

Was thinking about that thread as well.

AI and the future demon it releases will finish the job of destroying humanity that the "Greens" fantasize about. So its a win/win for Bill.
BboroAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bill is still a genius when it comes to vaccines though
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waffledynamics said:

This thread was prophetic.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3570245

Quote:


Over_ed
8:11a, 10/24/25

AG

"The gap between the energy required for artificial intelligence and the global grid's capacity to generate and transmit electricity is vast and unlikely to be closed within our lifetimes," said Dave Stangis. Senior Executive at Apollo Global, a leading Private Equity firm where he led the sustainable (green) energy strategy.

..."renewable energy alone will not suffice to power the AI era. As a result, global investment and industry are shifting from the previous mindset of "energy transition" to a more urgent model of "energy expansion."

In short, he is saying that reducing CO2 is no longer a realistic consideration, because of AI demand. In 2024, AI uses ~.3% of current electricity demand. In 10 years, AI demand is expected to grow 20-30X.

What you are hearing is the end of Climate Doomsayers. Rightly or wrongly, governments and industry have decided green energy loses.

Bloomberg article - VERY paywalled. I'll put AI Summary in next post.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-22/apollo-says-ai-energy-gap-will-not-be-closed-in-our-lifetime


samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

Why are we even listening to this guy as any type of scientific authority? BC he is rich?


F16 is not, but plenty of other morons are
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheCurl84 said:

Not enough. I want an apology. And retribution. Make the check payable to "TheCurl84".
I'm guessing it's in the stack with Michael Young's $1,200 check for solving Isaih Martin's racism hoax.
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WolfCall said:

Come on in, Bill! The water's fine! Thanks for realizing (and telling us) the world isn't going to end because of climate change.


https://nypost.com/2025/10/28/us-news/bill-gates-makes-major-climate-change-reversal-after-years-of-doomerism/
Quote:

Bill Gates makes major climate change reversal after years of doomerism: 'People will be able to live and thrive'
By Chris Nesi Published Oct. 28, 2025, 11:26 a.m. ET

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who has spent more than a decade warning that the world was on the brink of unimaginable peril due to rising global temperatures, now says climate change "will not lead to humanity's demise" in a stunning reversal.

Gates, 70, who has sunk billions of his vast fortune into initiatives ostensibly meant to combat global warming, penned a lengthy blog post this week urging a shift away from the "doomsday outlook" many climate activists have adopted to terrify nonbelievers into seeing things their way.

"Although climate change will have serious consequences particularly for people in the poorest countries it will not lead to humanity's demise," he wrote. "People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future."....

.....

....Gates, 70, who has sunk billions of his vast fortune into initiatives ostensibly meant to combat global warming, penned a lengthy blog post this week urging a shift away from the "doomsday outlook" many climate activists have adopted to terrify nonbelievers into seeing things their way....

.....




So we got lied to by a member from the Terrible Trifecta and we are shocked??

Bill checks 2 of the 3 boxes. He will lie, he will be selfish, he will try to cheat and mislead.

PS: I am a Bill Gates fan for his tech achievements.
WolfCall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

TheCurl84 said:

Not enough. I want an apology. And retribution. Make the check payable to "TheCurl84".

I'm guessing it's in the stack with Michael Young's $1,200 check for solving Isaih Martin's racism hoax.

Post of the day!
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds like Bill made a big investment in AI and needs more coal, gas, and oil fueled power plants.
Fireman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So full of *****....they want energy for the AI boom that's coming, so the reversal is financially motivated. The climate hoax was also financially motivated. These people should be called before congress and forced to admit they are full of ****, liars or both and thrown in jail if they continue to lie.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gates has just been following his buddy Buffets game plan of using government manipulation as an opportunity to cash in.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

Why are we even listening to this guy as any type of scientific authority? BC he is rich?


Plus, did he get approval from AOC on all this? If not, consider it null and void.

He doesn't have that kind of authority. How dare he think he does.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

agracer said:

AI and Datacenters need more power than windmills and solar can provide.

This mean Microsoft, Apple and all the other green energy tech giants are going to put climate 'science' on the back burner or their profits will

This is probably the angle. There definitely is one.

I was at the Trane Chiller Factory a couple of months go. The one in LaCross, WI that makes their large centrifugal chillers.

They did a $250M upgrade and expansion, and the place was full of 2-shift work making chillers for AI and Datacenters. Data Centers are asking for up twenty 2,000 Ton Machines. That's an insane amount of cooling capacity for a single complex. Hell, it could provide enough cooling for half a mid-sized city office towers.
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
**** bill. all of the sudden he's pro-energy because he needs it for AI data centers. **** him.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To be honest, I've said this for years as well. When you say "thing x" will cause global extinction everyone just kind of tunes out because global extinction is such an abstract thing to worry about on a daily basis and something most rational humans know they have no ability to effect.

So I don't see this as Bill Gates reversing his position as much as admitting that the rhetoric used to talk about climate change was actually counter productive at getting people to care about the environment. He's still just as loony as ever, but he's arguing for the use of different language to discuss climate change because he can see how ineffective the doomsday language was.

I'd assume that in the coming years we'll see a new approach from the leftists in terms of rhetoric but it'll just be a new version of the same grift.

(ETA I'm a pragmatic environmentalist that believes in not deliberately being a dick by polluting the planet, but who will never accept environmental policies that cause current day suffering to protect the earth from some dire future that is thousands of years away.)
Martels Hammer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What industry are you in if you don't mind me asking?
CampSkunk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like he grabbed his ears and pulled his head out. The fresh air must be making him happy.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you needed further proof that the elites knew climate change was a scam and not an existential threat to mankind, here you go.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My impression of Gates improves a bit based on this.

Long live Global Warming.
HalifaxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Drink the hemlock you big liar....at least have the integrity of the Greeks.

At the very least, close shop and be silent forever
Matt_ag98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably to make him feel better about the environmental impact his 66,000 sq ft mansion does to the Earth
A.G.S.94
How long do you want to ignore this user?

REALLY relieved he changed his stance, now we can all finally breath easy.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

To be honest, I've said this for years as well. When you say "thing x" will cause global extinction everyone just kind of tunes out because global extinction is such an abstract thing to worry about on a daily basis and something most rational humans know they have no ability to effect.

So I don't see this as Bill Gates reversing his position as much as admitting that the rhetoric used to talk about climate change was actually counter productive at getting people to care about the environment. He's still just as loony as ever, but he's arguing for the use of different language to discuss climate change because he can see how ineffective the doomsday language was.

I'd assume that in the coming years we'll see a new approach from the leftists in terms of rhetoric but it'll just be a new version of the same grift.

(ETA I'm a pragmatic environmentalist that believes in not deliberately being a dick by polluting the planet, but who will never accept environmental policies that cause current day suffering to protect the earth from some dire future that is thousands of years away.)


This is a rational take but Occam's Razor says this is Gates reversing course because his first passion (AI / technology) is more important than his second passion (green myth).

He's a fraud who became an environmental and health expert simply because he has money. He's also an immoral dbag who had an open marriage before his wife ended it when that became public.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.