HTownAg98 said:

---

Daddy said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Dems fell into the trap on this one. Habba is hot but a terrible lawyer that went to a joke of a law school and was cringe in her legal arguments for Trump. She's great on TV though and will play the role of martyr very well. This just gave Trump some great ammo and he now can actually replace her with someone that is a real bulldog and actually understands the law.

---

Would Trump hire a stupid person to keep his ass out of jail?

Did Trump get nailed by any of the a thousand charges the Democrats falsely went after him for?
Considering the CIA FBI doj Obama Clinton
Biden all were against Trump and he still beat him
That say he's done pretty well. And habba obviously has done well for him. Do I think that she had lawyers underneath Him doing the heavy lifting sure but Trump also wins the court of public appeals and having a lady who's gorgeous and smart and talented as the face every time they interview her that's winning.

There's effective and ineffective it sounds like she was effective.

---

Alina was not a part of the criminal cases; she was only involved in the civil cases. In those cases, she went 0-fer and got hit with a $937,000 sanction in the lawsuit against Hillary Clinton. You have to royally F up to get that kind of a sanction. Of course, maybe you and I have a different definition of effective.

---

937k was peanuts in the civil cases and again Trump's president right now despite 100 charges against his ass so guess what she was effective he won the court of public appeals and that was her job.

One more thing is any of you guys that follow me posting football God tends to be fair

The lady that tall that beautiful that smart isn't going to be a smart as an ugly nerdy woman that's got nothing going for like Greta

Trump uses both to get effective results

Some of you guys get your feelings hurt because it's how you gain value in life instead of through God.

As I said the results speak Trump keeps winning and he's hiring her and he's doing it for his ass

RGLAG85 said:

---

You made it 6 months 93, I'm proud of you!


Unfortunately, we now have too read your drivel for the next 3.5 years.

---

So you think Habba is a great legal mind? Or are you saying that Trump only hires amazing lawyers and people and never makes a mistake? I have praised and criticized Trump the same as always, based on what he does. Still very happy to have voted for him and with the job he is doing overall for sure, just don't agree with everything.

Of course my guess is you don't want to make any of those arguments and actually discuss them, you would rather just make some vague attack at me that's even more confusing than normal. I bet you feel really clever though so I'm happy for you.

Daddy said:

---

One more thing is any of you guys that follow me posting football God tends to be fair

The lady that tall that beautiful that smart isn't going to be a smart as an ugly nerdy woman that's got nothing going for like Greta

Trump uses both to get effective results

Some of you guys get your feelings hurt because it's how you gain value in life instead of through God.

As I said the results speak Trump keeps winning and he's hiring her and he's doing it for his ass

---

She's hot but she's also a fighter and very vocal, which is exactly what Trump needs since conservatives are always on the defense.

Daddy said:

---

One more thing is any of you guys that follow me posting football God tends to be fair

The lady that tall that beautiful that smart isn't going to be a smart as an ugly nerdy woman that's got nothing going for like Greta

Trump uses both to get effective results

Some of you guys get your feelings hurt because it's how you gain value in life instead of through God.

As I said the results speak Trump keeps winning and he's hiring her and he's doing it for his her ass

---

FIFY

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Yes, but it's always democrats breaking down traditions. It's always democrats attacking the rule of law. This is just the most recent example.

---

Reagan broke down a lot of traditions and it did this country a world of good.

Challenging the anti-war movement's influence on foreign policy

• Reagan openly rejected the notion of dtente, insisting on the superiority of representative government, free-market capitalism, and freedom of conscience over what he viewed as godless, collectivist, Communism.
• He also rejected the "Vietnam Syndrome," the public's reluctance to use military force in foreign countries for fear of embarrassment or defeat

Labor relations

• Reagan took a firm stance against striking air traffic controllers and fired all of them

Judicial appointments

• Reagan departed from the tradition of appointing judges with a proven track record of independence

Fiscal policy

• Reagan prioritized military spending in a time of peace

Direct Appeal to the people via using surrogates and media.
Etc

Is this the end of the habbanera?

Kansas Kid said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Yes, but it's always democrats breaking down traditions. It's always democrats attacking the rule of law. This is just the most recent example.

---

Reagan broke down a lot of traditions and it did this country a world of good.

---

This is not for the good of the country. It is for the good of the democrat party and lawlessness. There is a concerted effort to lock out Trump's nominees for US Attorney and judges. Not a single US Attorney has been confirmed. And only one federal judge.

But you know that.

IIIHorn said:

---

Is this the end of the habbanera?

---

Habbanera's are really hot.

🚨 BREAKING: Alina Habba STEPPED DOWN from her role as Interim US Attorney… and then President Trump IMMEDIATELY appointed her as ACTING US Attorney 🤣

CHECKMATE!

Activist judges who tried to get rid of Habba lose AGAIN! 😂🔥

She’ll remain in her office for several more… pic.twitter.com/DEGfI1QN3d

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 24, 2025

I said the traditions Reagan broke down were for the good of the country. Just pointing out that it isn't just Dems that have broken from tradition. It seems like most modern Presidents have done it to some extent.

Daddy said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Daddy said:

---

aggie93 said:

---

Dems fell into the trap on this one. Habba is hot but a terrible lawyer that went to a joke of a law school and was cringe in her legal arguments for Trump. She's great on TV though and will play the role of martyr very well. This just gave Trump some great ammo and he now can actually replace her with someone that is a real bulldog and actually understands the law.

---

Would Trump hire a stupid person to keep his ass out of jail?

Did Trump get nailed by any of the a thousand charges the Democrats falsely went after him for?
Considering the CIA FBI doj Obama Clinton
Biden all were against Trump and he still beat him
That say he's done pretty well. And habba obviously has done well for him. Do I think that she had lawyers underneath Him doing the heavy lifting sure but Trump also wins the court of public appeals and having a lady who's gorgeous and smart and talented as the face every time they interview her that's winning.

There's effective and ineffective it sounds like she was effective.

---

Alina was not a part of the criminal cases; she was only involved in the civil cases. In those cases, she went 0-fer and got hit with a $937,000 sanction in the lawsuit against Hillary Clinton. You have to royally F up to get that kind of a sanction. Of course, maybe you and I have a different definition of effective.

---

937k was peanuts in the civil cases and again Trump's president right now despite 100 charges against his ass so guess what she was effective he won the court of public appeals and that was her job.

---

This is a word casserole of nonsense.

Ship seems to think the judges will ignore this, and as well that her nomination will be withdrawn.

What seems to have happened in connection with the dispute over Alina Habba as U.S. Attorney for New Jersey is the following:

Habba was named "Interim U.S. Attorney" while her name is pending in the Senate to be the appointed U.S. Attorney.

But the "Interim" position is…

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) July 25, 2025

I think he's wrong, in this instance, but he may be partially correct and Trump will use this to challenge this law as unconstitutional (which I think it is, giving the judiciary a right to appoint an officer in the executive branch).

No doubt Trump is going to fight on the who is in charge in NJ issue, but he has no choice but to withdraw Habba's nomination. You can't be the nominee and be the acting.

She will just be "Acting" for the next 3.5 years**


**it looks like she may be only able to serve as Acting for 210 days, so until February.

Frivolous filings.

NEW: A criminal defendant filed the first of what could be many challenges to the authority of Acting U.S. attorney Alina Habba.

The matter has been sent to a district judge in PA because all the NJ judges are conflicted out.

w/ @ryrivard @joshgerstein https://t.co/OYCs7vzI6j pic.twitter.com/hOvHWQb69M

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) July 28, 2025

IMO, Habba is acting US attorney. But even if she's not, this motion is garbage.

JUST IN: The Trump administration says Leigh Grace should never be U.S. attorney for New Jersey, but just in case, Trump has fired her from the position. pic.twitter.com/NP54H8T1BP

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) July 29, 2025

District Judge with a TRO, telling the Executive Branch...which is tasked with appointments here, isn't allowed to appoint or un-appoint (fire) someone to/from that position in 3,2,1....

Ag with kids said:

---

IIIHorn said:

---

Is this the end of the habbanera?

---

Habbanera's are really hot.

---

I eat them, raw!!!


The peppers, too! ;-)

Same thing happening in CA. Except the Judge(s) didn't appoint anyone and stayed silent.

Breaking: Fox can confirm the Maga- aligned US attorney in Los Angeles Bill Essayli will become ‘Acting Atty’ after his 120 day interim period expires tomorrow. Chief Judge Dolly Gee declined to take action on Essayli appointment, basically denying him a permanent spot. This is…

— Matt Finn (@MattFinnFNC) July 29, 2025

Thune is at least tweeting or retweeting (or whatever it's called) the right things.

.@POTUS is the only president on record to not have a single civilian nominee confirmed via voice vote or unanimous consent. Democrats have even forced cloture votes on 22 noncontroversial civilian nominees who were ultimately confirmed with at least 60 votes and as many as 83. pic.twitter.com/iFxjYbKSsE

— Senate Republican Communications Center (@SRCC) July 29, 2025

.@POTUS is the only president on record to be denied a voice vote or unanimous consent confirmation for any of his civilian nominees.

I’m hoping that Senate Democrats will work with us so that we can start getting folks – many of them with bipartisan support – into their… pic.twitter.com/fwoHs5CyVp

— Leader John Thune (@LeaderJohnThune) July 29, 2025

We'll see, I think we both know better than to expect any backbone from GOP legislators.

Thune talks but has gone out of his way to obstruct the President's authority to make recess appointments by not having a real recess. That's the difference between rhetoric and leadership.

Thune doesn't support President Trump.

Quote:

---

The lady that tall that beautiful that smart isn't going to be a smart as an ugly nerdy woman that's got nothing going for like Greta

---

The heck?

Well here is a little constitutional crisis after lunch. A federal judge based in Pennsylvania, sitting for the New Jersey court, finds U.S. Attorney Alina Habba was not properly appointed. He declares her post-July 1 acts void. I am not sure this holds up on appeal . . . pic.twitter.com/IbIvTjk5kv

— Eric W. (@EWess92) August 21, 2025

To Judge Brann's credit, he puts forth a thorough summary of his holdings at the start of his discussion pic.twitter.com/qSEPS4ZYbW

— Eric W. (@EWess92) August 21, 2025

Obama appointed judges… everywhere.

Gonna need pix

A 77-page opinion?

Is that normal for a case like this?

Biz Ag said:

---

A 77-page opinion?

Is that normal for a case like this?

---

There's never been a case like this.

She 77 pages of fine!

Bob Knights Liver said:

---

She 77 pages of fine!

---

TTIWWOP....

Habba: What they don't understand is Article III judges do not pick the U.S. Attorney for the state. The President, Pam Bondi—that's who picks it. They had a collusion, a plan. I'm aware of it, and the DOJ is aware of it, and soon enough it'll come out. pic.twitter.com/LUwA4UNeqN

— Acyn (@Acyn) August 24, 2025

Can someone explain this to me like I'm 5? How do judges get to remove a presidential appointee?

ts5641 said:

---

Can someone explain this to me like I'm 5? How do judges get to remove a presidential appointee?

---

Technically, she is not a presidential appointee.

March 24, Habba is named interim US attorney "effective immediately". March 28 she is sworn in. by law she can be interim only 120 days.

In late June, Trump nominates her to be US attorney

120 days after March 24, the judges in New Jersey name first assistant Desiree Grace as US Attorney because Habba's term expired. The law expressly allows them to do this.

Trump argues the 120 days started when Habba was sworn in.

Bondi removes Grace as first assistant

Habba resigns as interim US attorney

Trump withdraws Habba nomination

Habba named new first assistant by Bondi

Beside Habba is highest ranking person in the office now, she becomes Acting US attorney.

" a person may not serve as an acting officer for an office under this section, if…. the President submits a nomination of such person to the Senate for appointment to such office."

Questions are:

(1) what date did the 120 day period start?

(2) does prohibition on a person nominated to the position not serving as acting include if the nomination is withdrawn

"120 days after March 24, the judges in New Jersey name first assistant Desiree Grace as US Attorney because Habba's term expired. The law expressly allows them to do this. "

The fact that any judges have any say in the appointment of any prosecutor is crazy to me and seems like a major conflict of interest.

BMX Bandit said:

---

ts5641 said:

---

Can someone explain this to me like I'm 5? How do judges get to remove a presidential appointee?

---

Technically, she is not a presidential appointee.

March 24, Habba is named interim US attorney "effective immediately". March 28 she is sworn in. by law she can be interim only 120 days.

In late June, Trump nominates her to be US attorney

120 days after March 24, the judges in New Jersey name first assistant Desiree Grace as US Attorney because Habba's term expired. The law expressly allows them to do this.

Trump argues the 120 days started when Habba was sworn in.

Bondi removes Grace as first assistant

Habba resigns as interim US attorney

Trump withdraws Habba nomination

Habba named new first assistant by Bondi

Beside Habba is highest ranking person in the office now, she becomes Acting US attorney.

" a person may not serve as an acting officer for an office under this section, if…. the President submits a nomination of such person to the Senate for appointment to such office."

Questions are:

(1) what date did the 120 day period start?

(2) does prohibition on a person nominated to the position not serving as acting include if the nomination is withdrawn

---

Is the law allowing the judges to do that constitutional?

it does seem a stretch to have Article III judges appointing Article II personnel like that...

Quote:

---

Is the law allowing the judges to do that constitutional?

---

Trump has not challenged the constitutionality of that law in anything I have seen. and thats likely because in this case (where a defendant is saying Habba didn't have authority to act) its not relevant.

after 120 days, she was no longer interim US attorney. That the judges appointed someone else is not really relevant here. but I expect that may come up in some other case or issue

Quote:

---

it does seem a stretch to have Article III judges appointing Article II personnel like that...

---

my guess is the law was put in place so the courts could still function in the face of non-action by the other two branches. someone has to do the job, so you don't want a situation where the senate won't confirm someone and executive won't name an interimm