DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

577,796 Views | 6607 Replies | Last: 35 sec ago by PaulsBunions
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie4Christ09 • 2:20p, 2/10/26
Aggie4Christ09 said:
It's like everyone is evil that runs the world. I'm honestly shocked.



So if a high profile person has a picture with another high profile person at a social event, that means they know everything about that person and what they are involved in? Not only that, but that they are in cahoots and engage in the exact same behavior?

Bill Cosby came to A&M numerous times and got pictures with hundreds, maybe thousands, of students. Does this mean those students are all date rapists by default?

Also, you heard that Trump alerted the authorities about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine back when you were in your young 20's (assuming 04 is your grad year), right? He has taken several actions against the creep...not sure what else you want.

We get it, you hate Trump with the fury of a thousand suns. Christ-like lol.
Reply Quote
18
2 edits
AggieVictor10
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 2:25p, 2/10/26
AG
Depends on the social event. Surely an event attended by evil minions of satan who can all be tied together should raise some eyebrows.

If not, moloch would be pleased.
Reply Quote
4
GeorgiAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Silent For Too Long • 2:39p, 2/10/26
AG
Silent For Too Long said:
I love how ya'll keep ignoring all the information about Trump working with law enforcement in 2006 to nail this creep.

It complete destroys your narrative so you just keep pretending not to see it.

That's because Epstein was taking all the hot minors for himself! Clearly, he was just taking out the competition.

(I kid.)
Reply Quote
1
Colonel Kurtz
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:29p, 2/10/26
AG
Welp, guess we're done here.
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
Aggie4Christ09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:32p, 2/10/26
Reply Quote
16
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Colonel Kurtz • 3:32p, 2/10/26
Colonel Kurtz said:
Welp, guess we're done here.

The ONLY way this is excusable and not a major blunder, is if they are really investigating the hell out of it behind the scenes. Which is the best way to investigate things.
Reply Quote
5
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie4Christ09 • 3:33p, 2/10/26
Aggie4Christ09 said:

Who is Brian Allen? Who are "lawmakers"? The opposition had this for years and refused to do anything for Trump out of "mercy"?

Need to see more. Not going to just blindly believe a bunch of people who have hated Trump with every fiber of their being ever since their girl Hillary lost.
Reply Quote
10
2 edits
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 3:47p, 2/10/26
1981 Monte Carlo said:
Aggie4Christ09 said:

Who is Brian Allen? Who are "lawmakers"? The opposition had this for years and refused to do anything for Trump out of "mercy"?

Need to see more. Not going to just blindly believe a bunch of people who have hated Trump with every fiber of their being ever since their girl Hillary lost.

Massie and Ro Khanna

Brian Allen is just some dude on X
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
David_Puddy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gig em G • 3:51p, 2/10/26
AG
Gig em G said:
How has no one implicated in this made an attempt to silence Massie, God forbid….

The man is doing the Lord's work right now


Yeah, I've changed my opinion on him drastically over this. This is all anyone should be talking about right now. Screw the Minnesota BS, ICE riot nonsense, halftime show, etc that they're trying to distract us with. It's time to start holding these people's feet to the fire. It's us vs. the elites. We want to see some serious charges brought on these people, or it's time for Bondi's ass to hit the road.
Reply Quote
17
AG512
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Silent For Too Long • 3:54p, 2/10/26
AG
Silent For Too Long said:
I love how ya'll keep ignoring all the information about Trump working with law enforcement in 2006 to nail this creep.

It complete destroys your narrative so you just keep pretending not to see it.

Reply Quote
1
FWTXAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to David_Puddy • 3:55p, 2/10/26
AG
David_Puddy said:
Gig em G said:
How has no one implicated in this made an attempt to silence Massie, God forbid….

The man is doing the Lord's work right now


Yeah, I've changed my opinion on him drastically over this. This is all anyone should be talking about right now. Screw the Minnesota BS, ICE riot nonsense, halftime show, etc that they're trying to distract us with. It's time to start holding these people's feet to the fire. It's us vs. the elites. We want to see some serious charges brought on these people, or it's time for Bondi's ass to hit the road.


Love this. The tide is going to overtake them all.

Make America Real Again is about to take over.
Reply Quote
4
BadMoonRisin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:59p, 2/10/26
AG


Wow this is pretty wild .

This aired in 2007, not 2001.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt1102620/?ref_=tt_eps_tp
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
David_Puddy
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 4:00p, 2/10/26
AG
1981 Monte Carlo said:
Aggie4Christ09 said:
It's like everyone is evil that runs the world. I'm honestly shocked.



So if a high profile person has a picture with another high profile person at a social event, that means they know everything about that person and what they are involved in? Not only that, but that they are in cahoots and engage in the exact same behavior?

Bill Cosby came to A&M numerous times and got pictures with hundreds, maybe thousands, of students. Does this mean those students are all date rapists by default?

Also, you heard that Trump alerted the authorities about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine back when you were in your young 20's (assuming 04 is your grad year), right? He has taken several actions against the creep...not sure what else you want.

We get it, you hate Trump with the fury of a thousand suns. Christ-like lol.


He's one of the few that is still on this Trump witch hunt. Despite all of the articles that have come out just like you mentioned, the fact that he is the most investigated man in history......they still don't have anything on him. It's just crazy to me that their hatred for Trump just has them wishcasting him into the same evil that people like Bill Gates and some of these world leaders were involved in.

People like him will be the reason why we will never be able to unite as a country and demand accountability. If there is one issue that all men (and women) should be able to unite for, it should be this.
Reply Quote
5
Line Ate Member
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie4Christ09 • 4:12p, 2/10/26
AG
Aggie4Christ09 said:
Too bad these congressmen say one thing public and then ask and say different things in the closed sessions.

I imagine that number is far less than what is reported here.
Reply Quote
2
Rapier108
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Line Ate Member • 4:13p, 2/10/26
Line Ate Member said:
Aggie4Christ09 said:

Too bad these congressmen say one thing public and then ask and say different things in the closed sessions.

I imagine that number is far less than what is reported here.

Last week it was 30,000 "mentions." Today it is 1 million.

That alone is nuclear grade bull*****
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Reply Quote
6
Aggie4Christ09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 4:31p, 2/10/26
[Talking and debating this subject is just fine. Calling other users fascists is not. -Staff]
Reply Quote
3
Edited by Staff
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Colonel Kurtz • 4:36p, 2/10/26
AG
Colonel Kurtz said:
Welp, guess we're done here.

Reply Quote
3
1981 Monte Carlo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:39p, 2/10/26
I see that the post about the girl talking about Jesus saving her was deleted. Please tell me this email was AI or turned out to be bogus? Please. It's too painful to think that may be real.
Reply Quote
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 4:45p, 2/10/26
AG
1981 Monte Carlo said:
I see that the post about the girl talking about Jesus saving her was deleted. Please tell me this email was AI or turned out to be bogus? Please. It's too painful to think that may be real.

Pretty sure it was deleted because it was a duplicate post. The original post of the same message is two pages back.
Reply Quote
2
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:55p, 2/10/26
AG
I would not lend much credence to emails, particularly without validation accompanying it.

Like with Lutnick. I absolutely believe he should explain himself, offer any context or information on the emails and whether they were valid, and if he lied he needs to go from the admin.

If it looks like he committed crimes, investigate it. And if he did he should pay the maximum in criminal and civil penalties.

There is a way to sort through this and I think some folks will. I have said previously this needs the sort of analysis as they did for the Twitter files with Matt Taibi and Miranda Devine.

Determine the population of victims. Take their sworn statements if that has not occurred. Investigate those crimes, again if it has not already been done.

The posting of the same bombastic allegations where some even reach beyond the wildest of imaginations does not bring justice.

If you want to build a case to take down the rich and powerful, build it. Else you are creating more noise that allows for innocent people to be smeared and guilty people to claim their perpetual innocence.

Get past the noise of pickled kids feet, drinking blood of fetuses, child torture and other nonsense that in almost absolute certainty did not occur.
Reply Quote
2
shiftyandquick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:06p, 2/10/26
who's going to do all this? Justice Dept certainly won't.
Reply Quote
9
Zachary Klement
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 5:08p, 2/10/26
AG
Agree with a lot of this.

With everything, you have to use your ability to discern what seems legit and what doesn't.

The hyper-sensationalized stuff like Bush eating kids, is not worth believing unless there is some evidence to substantiate that.

Him having lunch meetings with Lutnick? I will take that at face value, it seems legit. His extended correspondence with Bannon? Clearly legit. A number of other more mundane communications with people who don't want to be associated with him now, seem legit.

Someone who is in Lutnick's shoes should posture themself the way Musk has if they have nothing to hide. Come out, explain why you were hanging out with the dude. In Lutnick's case, own up that you lied about when you terminated your relationship with Epstein.
Reply Quote
1
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to shiftyandquick • 5:15p, 2/10/26
AG
shiftyandquick said:
who's going to do all this? Justice Dept certainly won't.

If there is truly a fire within the smoke then someone will pursue the story. See Harvey Weinstein. It was shutdown again and again but someone finally ran it down hard enough to break it.

Just be careful that you don't fall for a prescriptive narrative. Watergate was a complete setup as Nixon was as bucking the system. It's a similar MO to how they tried to loop Trump with Russigate.

If you fancy yourself a Reagan Republican, you should be holding MSM to account for feeding pissarse narratives vs doing their ****ing jobs.
Reply Quote
2
Texas velvet maestro
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Zachary Klement • 5:16p, 2/10/26
Zachary Klement said:


..The hyper-sensationalized stuff like Bush eating kids, is not worth believing unless there is some evidence to substantiate that. ..



But it seems like something he would do.
Reply Quote
1
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Texas velvet maestro • 5:19p, 2/10/26
AG
Chief liaison to China in the 1970's. Probably started with puppy's then pangolins then move into pickled pediatric podiatry.
Reply Quote
1
policywonk98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:39p, 2/10/26
AG
Unfortunately for all of us and for the victims of Epstein, the hoax emails and out of context outrage posts about various people in the trove of documents is precisely why the erosion of trust in our law enforcement and justice system has become such a detriment in the age of social media.

I realize saying this places me in the "trying to protect pedos" outrage incorporated crosshairs. But what is happening now is why the justice departments of four different presidential administrations didn't just dump all this stuff out into the public.

I want justice for human traffickers and their customers. I've paid good money supporting organizations that support victims of these vile acts and org that work on the Justice and law enforcement investigations side around the world. It's a worthy cause that every decent human being with means should support.

But this dumping of millions of pages of documents doesn't seem to be helping the cause very much. But none of this is about fighting the problems of the Epsteins of the world. It seems to be about feeding the purient interests of the masses and political operatives from all sides using out of context information for political gain.

I hope the real efforts to bring sex traffickers to justice dont take a step backwards in the middle of all of this.
Reply Quote
11
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to policywonk98 • 5:53p, 2/10/26
AG
You can go to the DOJ website where they provide updates on the many many things Trump demands focus on.

I truly think the entire concept of Epstein and sex trafficking of anyone but particularly children is something he takes to heart.

Is he perfect on that? No. Does it help when he calls the outrage over the release of files a hoax? No. He needs a much better framing of how to describe the ****nannery of mass dockamentz dump.
Reply Quote
1
blacksox
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 7:08p, 2/10/26
flown-the-coop said:
You can go to the DOJ website where they provide updates on the many many things Trump demands focus on.

I truly think the entire concept of Epstein and sex trafficking of anyone but particularly children is something he takes to heart.

Is he perfect on that? No. Does it help when he calls the outrage over the release of files a hoax? No. He needs a much better framing of how to describe the ****nannery of mass dockamentz dump.


You think the guy who calls this a Democrat hoax, who has had his name scrubbed 10s of thousands of time from the files, is desperately trying to change the subject every day and who is in violation of federal law for not having timely turned over the files is taking this thing to heart? Dear lord . . .
Reply Quote
22
Ervin Burrell
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blacksox • 7:21p, 2/10/26
AG
blacksox said:
flown-the-coop said:
You can go to the DOJ website where they provide updates on the many many things Trump demands focus on.

I truly think the entire concept of Epstein and sex trafficking of anyone but particularly children is something he takes to heart.

Is he perfect on that? No. Does it help when he calls the outrage over the release of files a hoax? No. He needs a much better framing of how to describe the ****nannery of mass dockamentz dump.


You think the guy who calls this a Democrat hoax, who has had his name scrubbed 10s of thousands of time from the files, is desperately trying to change the subject every day and who is in violation of federal law for not having timely turned over the files is taking this thing to heart? Dear lord . . .


The poster you're replying to would defend Trump even if he murdered every person in the world he cared about. HTH.
Reply Quote
22
1 edit
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:30p, 2/10/26
So Trump ratted on Epstein in 2005? Wait 2006

Reply Quote
1
1 edit
BQ78
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blacksox • 7:35p, 2/10/26
AG
What Federal law is Trump violating for not releasing the files Biden sat on for 4?years?
Reply Quote
6
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 7:49p, 2/10/26
flown-the-coop said:
Chief liaison to China in the 1970's. Probably started with puppy's then pangolins then move into pickled pediatric podiatry.


Perfectly pronounced.
Reply Quote
2
setsmachine
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to blacksox • 7:55p, 2/10/26
AG
blacksox said:
flown-the-coop said:
You can go to the DOJ website where they provide updates on the many many things Trump demands focus on.

I truly think the entire concept of Epstein and sex trafficking of anyone but particularly children is something he takes to heart.

Is he perfect on that? No. Does it help when he calls the outrage over the release of files a hoax? No. He needs a much better framing of how to describe the ****nannery of mass dockamentz dump.


You think the guy who calls this a Democrat hoax, who has had his name scrubbed 10s of thousands of time from the files, is desperately trying to change the subject every day and who is in violation of federal law for not having timely turned over the files is taking this thing to heart? Dear lord . . .

The title of this thread is from a memo where Trump's Justice Dept says there is no client list. The Epstein Files Transparency Act had to be passed because the DOJ was putting a lid on it. Obviously this is not the correct way to do an investigation, but Congress had to step up and do what they could when the Executive shut it down.
Reply Quote
6
Gig em G
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 1981 Monte Carlo • 8:14p, 2/10/26
AG
1981 Monte Carlo said:
I see that the post about the girl talking about Jesus saving her was deleted. Please tell me this email was AI or turned out to be bogus? Please. It's too painful to think that may be real.


The email is on the DOJ's website. Document EFTA00878421. I have no words…
Reply Quote
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:33p, 2/10/26
After listening to the mike Benz explanation, its clear epstein is far bigger than trump, Biden, republicans or democrats amd the reason most any politician or letter org is so ready to cover it up is because he was an intelligence asset for the usa and others. He was a conduit through which money flowed/was laundered for Cia actions all over the world.

But, it appears the real hesitation by the fbi, doj etc to clearly release the info is because it would likely harm said organizations, especially the cia.

I say do it. Time to reap what you've sowed.
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
First Page Last Page
Page 186 of 189 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.