Zachary Klement said:

---

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Epstein took a photo during his 2015 dinner with Zuckerberg and Musk and sent it to himself over email.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/AJxrfDZ8VQ

— AF Post (@AFpost) February 7, 2026

---

ORRRRRRR he snagged a photo off the internet and emailed it to himself with no proof he was even there, he's not in the photo. His pattern of emailing himself is crap or mocked up back and forth communications is very telling

---

Maybe, maybe not. Elon was begging to get out there to the island, he has pics with Ghislaine.

---

Believe it was Epstein begging Elon.

Do you think Elon flew to someone else's island for some tang he could have on his plane cruising around with completely anonymity?

flown-the-coop said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Epstein took a photo during his 2015 dinner with Zuckerberg and Musk and sent it to himself over email.

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/AJxrfDZ8VQ

— AF Post (@AFpost) February 7, 2026

---

ORRRRRRR he snagged a photo off the internet and emailed it to himself with no proof he was even there, he's not in the photo. His pattern of emailing himself is crap or mocked up back and forth communications is very telling

---

Maybe, maybe not. Elon was begging to get out there to the island, he has pics with Ghislaine.

---

Believe it was Epstein begging Elon.

Do you think Elon flew to someone else's island for some tang he could have on his plane cruising around with completely anonymity?

---

Did you read any of the email exchanges between Musk and Epstein in the latest release???

Have they been validated as authentic?

Rep. Thomas Massie is publicly calling for the resignation of U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick.

The call comes after revelations that Lutnick visited Epstein Island with his children on a family vacation and was also a business partner of Jeffrey Epstein.

Massie points… pic.twitter.com/KJ3GUZ0DVt

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) February 8, 2026

flown-the-coop said:

---

Have they been validated as authentic?

---

I think Musk would be shutting them down if they were fake.

So he has confirmed they are legit?

AgDev01 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

So he has confirmed they are legit?

---

Why don't you answer his question or just admit that you were wrong instead of trying to crawfish out of it?

You weren't questioning the authenticity when making your claim, why question it when being called out?

---

He didn't ask me a question other than whether I read them.

There are millions of pages of mostly redundant information and lots of emails that are obviously fake, unhinged, etc.

No, I have not, will not read those exchanges then come to TexAgs and preach them as confirmed, verifies, validated, authenticate biblical truth.

That's no crawfishing and you are weak to level such an accusation.

Elon has made several X posts on Epstein. It's not on me to link them every time someone reads an email about HW eating pickles kids feet.

flown-the-coop said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

So he has confirmed they are legit?

---

Why don't you answer his question or just admit that you were wrong instead of trying to crawfish out of it?

You weren't questioning the authenticity when making your claim, why question it when being called out?

---

He didn't ask me a question other than whether I read them.

There are millions of pages of mostly redundant information and lots of emails that are obviously fake, unhinged, etc.

No, I have not, will not read those exchanges then come to TexAgs and preach them as confirmed, verifies, validated, authenticate biblical truth.

That's no crawfishing and you are weak to level such an accusation.

Elon has made several X posts on Epstein. It's not on me to link them every time someone reads an email about HW eating pickles kids feet.

---

Sure, many of the things in the files are likely fake. The HW stuff is surely nonsense.

There is also uncertainty about a lot of the things in the files, but much of the information is worth scrutinizing and not just writing off as nonsense, IMO.

I'd rather question it and continue to talk about it and demand answers rather than just accept whatever narrative politicians want to make up this time.

oops already posted

Zachary Klement said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

So he has confirmed they are legit?

---

Why don't you answer his question or just admit that you were wrong instead of trying to crawfish out of it?

You weren't questioning the authenticity when making your claim, why question it when being called out?

---

He didn't ask me a question other than whether I read them.

There are millions of pages of mostly redundant information and lots of emails that are obviously fake, unhinged, etc.

No, I have not, will not read those exchanges then come to TexAgs and preach them as confirmed, verifies, validated, authenticate biblical truth.

That's no crawfishing and you are weak to level such an accusation.

Elon has made several X posts on Epstein. It's not on me to link them every time someone reads an email about HW eating pickles kids feet.

---

Sure, many of the things in the files are likely fake. The HW stuff is surely nonsense.

There is also uncertainty about a lot of the things in the files, but much of the information is worth scrutinizing and not just writing off as nonsense, IMO.

I'd rather question it and continue to talk about it and demand answers rather than just accept whatever narrative politicians want to make up this time.

---

Sure, Elon and others are more than welcome to defend themselves for what has been released. But Elon has publicly addressed this stuff (unless this is even more stuff for him to address) and at some point you have to sort fact from fiction.

Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lutnick, Elon and others participated in underage sex trafficking? I think it's pretty clear Ghislaine and Jeffrey did along with Prince Andrew.

Clinton has some pictures to explain. But giving credence to these emails seems like tabloid fodder to me. But investigate away and let us know what you come up with.

flown-the-coop said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

So he has confirmed they are legit?

---

Why don't you answer his question or just admit that you were wrong instead of trying to crawfish out of it?

You weren't questioning the authenticity when making your claim, why question it when being called out?

---

He didn't ask me a question other than whether I read them.

There are millions of pages of mostly redundant information and lots of emails that are obviously fake, unhinged, etc.

No, I have not, will not read those exchanges then come to TexAgs and preach them as confirmed, verifies, validated, authenticate biblical truth.

That's no crawfishing and you are weak to level such an accusation.

Elon has made several X posts on Epstein. It's not on me to link them every time someone reads an email about HW eating pickles kids feet.

---

Sure, many of the things in the files are likely fake. The HW stuff is surely nonsense.

There is also uncertainty about a lot of the things in the files, but much of the information is worth scrutinizing and not just writing off as nonsense, IMO.

I'd rather question it and continue to talk about it and demand answers rather than just accept whatever narrative politicians want to make up this time.

---

Sure, Elon and others are more than welcome to defend themselves for what has been released. But Elon has publicly addressed this stuff (unless this is even more stuff for him to address) and at some point you have to sort fact from fiction.

Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lutnick, Elon and others participated in underage sex trafficking? I think it's pretty clear Ghislaine and Jeffrey did along with Prince Andrew.

Clinton has some pictures to explain. But giving credence to these emails seems like tabloid fodder to me. But investigate away and let us know what you come up with.

---

FWIW, I think Elon is clean. He clearly was connected to Epstein in some sense, but he has been so adamant about 1) releasing the files and 2) punishing people who are implicated. He has seemed confident that there are people that should be arrested, which I find interesting.

Lutnick has clearly lied about his connections to Epstein though. He said that he cut Epstein off in 2005, but their correspondence continued until at least 2012 and seemed to be of a personal and professional nature. That should be enough to end a political career, IMO.

To be clear, do you think everything in the files is just complete bull**** and worth writing off? If so, why carry on in this thread?

Zachary Klement said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

So he has confirmed they are legit?

---

Why don't you answer his question or just admit that you were wrong instead of trying to crawfish out of it?

You weren't questioning the authenticity when making your claim, why question it when being called out?

---

He didn't ask me a question other than whether I read them.

There are millions of pages of mostly redundant information and lots of emails that are obviously fake, unhinged, etc.

No, I have not, will not read those exchanges then come to TexAgs and preach them as confirmed, verifies, validated, authenticate biblical truth.

That's no crawfishing and you are weak to level such an accusation.

Elon has made several X posts on Epstein. It's not on me to link them every time someone reads an email about HW eating pickles kids feet.

---

Sure, many of the things in the files are likely fake. The HW stuff is surely nonsense.

There is also uncertainty about a lot of the things in the files, but much of the information is worth scrutinizing and not just writing off as nonsense, IMO.

I'd rather question it and continue to talk about it and demand answers rather than just accept whatever narrative politicians want to make up this time.

---

Sure, Elon and others are more than welcome to defend themselves for what has been released. But Elon has publicly addressed this stuff (unless this is even more stuff for him to address) and at some point you have to sort fact from fiction.

Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lutnick, Elon and others participated in underage sex trafficking? I think it's pretty clear Ghislaine and Jeffrey did along with Prince Andrew.

Clinton has some pictures to explain. But giving credence to these emails seems like tabloid fodder to me. But investigate away and let us know what you come up with.

---

FWIW, I think Elon is clean. He clearly was connected to Epstein in some sense, but he has been so adamant about 1) releasing the files and 2) punishing people who are implicated. He has seemed confident that there are people that should be arrested, which I find interesting.

Lutnick has clearly lied about his connections to Epstein though. He said that he cut Epstein off in 2005, but their correspondence continued until at least 2012 and seemed to be of a personal and professional nature. That should be enough to end a political career, IMO.

To be clear, do you think everything in the files is just complete bull**** and worth writing off? If so, why carry on in this thread?

---

I do NOT think the files are completely BS. But I am equally not surprised the files boxes are filled with so much disinformation, unverified information, redundant information, information inconsistent within the files and versus previous public knowledge.

In short, it is the utter cluster**** one would have expected from the FBI stuffing the file with anything and everything and the politicization of it only increased the contents of that file exponentially.

And I think page after page focusing on which big name can be tweeted about next is not in the pursuit of any "justice" for the victims.

And I will say it again for clarity. Whomever is shown to have broken the law here (criminal law) should be persecuted and prosecuted to the greatest extent. But that doesn't start with believing Trump murdered young girls and buried them on golf courses and that Robin Leach was a serial killer of children.

flown-the-coop said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

AgDev01 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

So he has confirmed they are legit?

---

Why don't you answer his question or just admit that you were wrong instead of trying to crawfish out of it?

You weren't questioning the authenticity when making your claim, why question it when being called out?

---

He didn't ask me a question other than whether I read them.

There are millions of pages of mostly redundant information and lots of emails that are obviously fake, unhinged, etc.

No, I have not, will not read those exchanges then come to TexAgs and preach them as confirmed, verifies, validated, authenticate biblical truth.

That's no crawfishing and you are weak to level such an accusation.

Elon has made several X posts on Epstein. It's not on me to link them every time someone reads an email about HW eating pickles kids feet.

---

Sure, many of the things in the files are likely fake. The HW stuff is surely nonsense.

There is also uncertainty about a lot of the things in the files, but much of the information is worth scrutinizing and not just writing off as nonsense, IMO.

I'd rather question it and continue to talk about it and demand answers rather than just accept whatever narrative politicians want to make up this time.

---

Sure, Elon and others are more than welcome to defend themselves for what has been released. But Elon has publicly addressed this stuff (unless this is even more stuff for him to address) and at some point you have to sort fact from fiction.

Is there any evidence whatsoever that Lutnick, Elon and others participated in underage sex trafficking? I think it's pretty clear Ghislaine and Jeffrey did along with Prince Andrew.

Clinton has some pictures to explain. But giving credence to these emails seems like tabloid fodder to me. But investigate away and let us know what you come up with.

---

FWIW, I think Elon is clean. He clearly was connected to Epstein in some sense, but he has been so adamant about 1) releasing the files and 2) punishing people who are implicated. He has seemed confident that there are people that should be arrested, which I find interesting.

Lutnick has clearly lied about his connections to Epstein though. He said that he cut Epstein off in 2005, but their correspondence continued until at least 2012 and seemed to be of a personal and professional nature. That should be enough to end a political career, IMO.

To be clear, do you think everything in the files is just complete bull**** and worth writing off? If so, why carry on in this thread?

---

I do NOT think the files are completely BS. But I am equally not surprised the files boxes are filled with so much disinformation, unverified information, redundant information, information inconsistent within the files and versus previous public knowledge.

In short, it is the utter cluster**** one would have expected from the FBI stuffing the file with anything and everything and the politicization of it only increased the contents of that file exponentially.

And I think page after page focusing on which big name can be tweeted about next is not in the pursuit of any "justice" for the victims.

And I will say it again for clarity. Whomever is shown to have broken the law here (criminal law) should be persecuted and prosecuted to the greatest extent. But that doesn't start with believing Trump murdered young girls and buried them on golf courses and that Robin Leach was a serial killer of children.

---

Fair. I agree with a lot of this, it certainly is a cluster.

It seems less and less likely that anyone will face significant consequences. I'd bet the most meaningful stuff has been torched already or will never see the light of day, sadly.

Zachary Klement said:

---

Draft statement on Epstein's death from Aug 9 2019

He was found dead on Aug 10th at 6:30 in the morning

Reference: https://t.co/lqvvI2NGkF pic.twitter.com/OQlSdmIHdJ

— AlexandruC4 (@AlexandruC4) February 8, 2026

---

WTF…

Philip J Fry said:

---

---

Seems like they had more imagination in their skits back then.

Tomorrow I will go to DOJ to view the unredacted Epstein files.

Which docs should I view?
Include EFTA link in reply

I will sort the replies to this post by “number of likes,” so instead of making redundant posts, please “like” replies that contain docs you think are important.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) February 8, 2026

I will pay for the defense of anyone who speaks the truth about this and is sued for doing so

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 8, 2026

Doing what I can for justice. It’s messed up that so many people are getting away with hurting minors. The prosecution counter for Epstein clients can’t be zero.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 9, 2026

FBI: Epstein Didn't Run a Sex-Trafficking Ring for the Powerful
Ed Morrissey 9:20 AM | February 09, 2026

Consider this a spoiler alert for those still searching through the three million pages of documents released by the Department of Justice last week, hoping to find the smoking gun on Jeffrey Epstein and the moneyed elite. As has been clear now for a few years, the smoking gun doesn't exist, at least according to the FBI. Epstein trafficked underage girls to feed his own perversity, but the vast Epstein trafficking and extortion ring didn't exist.

The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein's bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world's most influential people.

But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.

But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.

Is it possible that prosecutors missed a sex-trafficking ring of the proposed enormity suggested by accusers? Theoretically, sure. In practical terms, no way. The DoJ didn't just collect three million pages of testimony and evidence as an afterthought, nor did they catalog 180,000 images and thousands of hours of video.

The FBI and prosecutors clearly wanted to build a case on Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, along with anyone else implicated in potential trafficking. The DoJ under two presidents spent thousands of man-hours maybe tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands building a massive trove of testimony and evidence, and they didn't do that to shrug off Epstein or protect his super-rich pals.

If Maxwell had evidence of a wider operation, she would have cut a plea deal to expose it at that point.

More to the point, though, the DoJs of Joe Biden and Donald Trump had ample motive to dig for dirt in the Epstein files. Neither came up with anything significant. Democrats convinced themselves that the files had a political kill shot hidden on Trump over the past year, but Merrick Garland wouldn't have hesitated for a second to publicize it before the 2024 election if it existed. Pam Bondi couldn't find anything either, despite her suspicions of a vast conspiracy.

LMCane said:

---

FBI: Epstein Didn't Run a Sex-Trafficking Ring for the Powerful
Ed Morrissey 9:20 AM | February 09, 2026

Consider this a spoiler alert for those still searching through the three million pages of documents released by the Department of Justice last week, hoping to find the smoking gun on Jeffrey Epstein and the moneyed elite. As has been clear now for a few years, the smoking gun doesn't exist, at least according to the FBI. Epstein trafficked underage girls to feed his own perversity, but the vast Epstein trafficking and extortion ring didn't exist.

The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein's bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world's most influential people.

But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.

But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.

Is it possible that prosecutors missed a sex-trafficking ring of the proposed enormity suggested by accusers? Theoretically, sure. In practical terms, no way. The DoJ didn't just collect three million pages of testimony and evidence as an afterthought, nor did they catalog 180,000 images and thousands of hours of video.

The FBI and prosecutors clearly wanted to build a case on Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, along with anyone else implicated in potential trafficking. The DoJ under two presidents spent thousands of man-hours maybe tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands building a massive trove of testimony and evidence, and they didn't do that to shrug off Epstein or protect his super-rich pals.

If Maxwell had evidence of a wider operation, she would have cut a plea deal to expose it at that point.

More to the point, though, the DoJs of Joe Biden and Donald Trump had ample motive to dig for dirt in the Epstein files. Neither came up with anything significant. Democrats convinced themselves that the files had a political kill shot hidden on Trump over the past year, but Merrick Garland wouldn't have hesitated for a second to publicize it before the 2024 election if it existed. Pam Bondi couldn't find anything either, despite her suspicions of a vast conspiracy.

---

In other words, it really was all a big hoax.

LMCane said:

---

FBI: Epstein Didn't Run a Sex-Trafficking Ring for the Powerful
Ed Morrissey 9:20 AM | February 09, 2026

Consider this a spoiler alert for those still searching through the three million pages of documents released by the Department of Justice last week, hoping to find the smoking gun on Jeffrey Epstein and the moneyed elite. As has been clear now for a few years, the smoking gun doesn't exist, at least according to the FBI. Epstein trafficked underage girls to feed his own perversity, but the vast Epstein trafficking and extortion ring didn't exist.

The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein's bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world's most influential people.

But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.

But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.

Is it possible that prosecutors missed a sex-trafficking ring of the proposed enormity suggested by accusers? Theoretically, sure. In practical terms, no way. The DoJ didn't just collect three million pages of testimony and evidence as an afterthought, nor did they catalog 180,000 images and thousands of hours of video.

The FBI and prosecutors clearly wanted to build a case on Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, along with anyone else implicated in potential trafficking. The DoJ under two presidents spent thousands of man-hours maybe tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands building a massive trove of testimony and evidence, and they didn't do that to shrug off Epstein or protect his super-rich pals.

If Maxwell had evidence of a wider operation, she would have cut a plea deal to expose it at that point.

More to the point, though, the DoJs of Joe Biden and Donald Trump had ample motive to dig for dirt in the Epstein files. Neither came up with anything significant. Democrats convinced themselves that the files had a political kill shot hidden on Trump over the past year, but Merrick Garland wouldn't have hesitated for a second to publicize it before the 2024 election if it existed. Pam Bondi couldn't find anything either, despite her suspicions of a vast conspiracy.

---

Is that article sarcasm?

Are all of these emails fake?

Rex Racer said:

---

LMCane said:

---

FBI: Epstein Didn't Run a Sex-Trafficking Ring for the Powerful
Ed Morrissey 9:20 AM | February 09, 2026

Consider this a spoiler alert for those still searching through the three million pages of documents released by the Department of Justice last week, hoping to find the smoking gun on Jeffrey Epstein and the moneyed elite. As has been clear now for a few years, the smoking gun doesn't exist, at least according to the FBI. Epstein trafficked underage girls to feed his own perversity, but the vast Epstein trafficking and extortion ring didn't exist.

The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein's bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world's most influential people.

But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.

But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.

Is it possible that prosecutors missed a sex-trafficking ring of the proposed enormity suggested by accusers? Theoretically, sure. In practical terms, no way. The DoJ didn't just collect three million pages of testimony and evidence as an afterthought, nor did they catalog 180,000 images and thousands of hours of video.

The FBI and prosecutors clearly wanted to build a case on Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, along with anyone else implicated in potential trafficking. The DoJ under two presidents spent thousands of man-hours maybe tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands building a massive trove of testimony and evidence, and they didn't do that to shrug off Epstein or protect his super-rich pals.

If Maxwell had evidence of a wider operation, she would have cut a plea deal to expose it at that point.

More to the point, though, the DoJs of Joe Biden and Donald Trump had ample motive to dig for dirt in the Epstein files. Neither came up with anything significant. Democrats convinced themselves that the files had a political kill shot hidden on Trump over the past year, but Merrick Garland wouldn't have hesitated for a second to publicize it before the 2024 election if it existed. Pam Bondi couldn't find anything either, despite her suspicions of a vast conspiracy.

---

In other words, it really was all a big hoax.

---

We don't need some legacy blogger to explain what we can read for ourselves from the emails lol

I've now seen what several people pointed out -- Epstein's references to using a SCIF. Obviously, if Epstein meant that literally, it'd mean he was accessing classified material, or had escorted access for non-classified material in a SCIF setting. Not sure what to make of it 🧵 pic.twitter.com/16MjnrmvRv

— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) February 9, 2026

Is this email real? Heartbreaking and blood boiling if so. Super frustrating that it's almost impossible to tell what's real and what's not.

https://instagr.am/p/DUiXZP5jfX5

Yes it's real and entirely unsurprising considering what demonic cult he belongs to.

Why would ANY of that be redacted? If this is real and we are not being massively trolled with these emails about torture rape and murder, F*** TRUMP...and F basically every politician on the left and right, aside from maybe 1 or 2. Anyone who protects these people in any way deserves unthinkable punishment.

If these are real emails, a good president would be absolutely raising hell.

This is truly how I feel seeing some of these emails:

LMCane said:

---

FBI: Epstein Didn't Run a Sex-Trafficking Ring for the Powerful
Ed Morrissey 9:20 AM | February 09, 2026

Consider this a spoiler alert for those still searching through the three million pages of documents released by the Department of Justice last week, hoping to find the smoking gun on Jeffrey Epstein and the moneyed elite. As has been clear now for a few years, the smoking gun doesn't exist, at least according to the FBI. Epstein trafficked underage girls to feed his own perversity, but the vast Epstein trafficking and extortion ring didn't exist.

The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein's bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world's most influential people.

But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.

But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.

Is it possible that prosecutors missed a sex-trafficking ring of the proposed enormity suggested by accusers? Theoretically, sure. In practical terms, no way. The DoJ didn't just collect three million pages of testimony and evidence as an afterthought, nor did they catalog 180,000 images and thousands of hours of video.

The FBI and prosecutors clearly wanted to build a case on Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, along with anyone else implicated in potential trafficking. The DoJ under two presidents spent thousands of man-hours maybe tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands building a massive trove of testimony and evidence, and they didn't do that to shrug off Epstein or protect his super-rich pals.

If Maxwell had evidence of a wider operation, she would have cut a plea deal to expose it at that point.

More to the point, though, the DoJs of Joe Biden and Donald Trump had ample motive to dig for dirt in the Epstein files. Neither came up with anything significant. Democrats convinced themselves that the files had a political kill shot hidden on Trump over the past year, but Merrick Garland wouldn't have hesitated for a second to publicize it before the 2024 election if it existed. Pam Bondi couldn't find anything either, despite her suspicions of a vast conspiracy.

---

The fakest of news.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Why would ANY of that be redacted? If this is real and we are not being massively trolled with these emails about torture rape and murder, F*** TRUMP...and F basically every politician on the left and right, aside from maybe 1 or 2. Anyone who protects these people in any way deserves unthinkable punishment.

If these are real emails, a good president would be absolutely raising hell.

This is truly how I feel seeing some of these emails:

---

The fact that there is a whole bunch of useless stuff that potentially does more harm than good is in those files was mentioned by many people. But the TDS troopers would have none of it. They were so convinced they got im now, they didn't care about anything else. Not the truth, not the victims, not anything. They kept beating the drum to release the files, release the files, release the files.

Well, they're released now and guess what? There's nothing in there that hurts Trump. So, congrats I guess?

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Why would ANY of that be redacted? If this is real and we are not being massively trolled with these emails about torture rape and murder, F*** TRUMP...and F basically every politician on the left and right, aside from maybe 1 or 2. Anyone who protects these people in any way deserves unthinkable punishment.

If these are real emails, a good president would be absolutely raising hell.

This is truly how I feel seeing some of these emails:

---

Why should someone's name be dragged through the mud because Epstein sent him an e-mail?

Quote:

---

To: Bob
From: Jeff

Hi Bob, we met last week at that party for Jill's 50th birthday and talked about you possibly joining other inventors in a business venture I'm launching in the new year.

Wanted to see if you were still interested?

Jeff

******************************

To: Jeff
From Bob

Jeff, after careful consideration, I'm going to pass, but thanks for the offer.

Bob

---

Should Bob have his name thrown out there so the mob can go after him for absolutely nothing?

Talking to Epstein does not make someone guilty of a crime. Even doing business with him does not make someone guilty of a crime. Even if Epstein said someone did something illegal in an e-mail to himself, that is not proof of anything; certainly not enough to arrest someone.

Based on the majority of the posters in this thread, most of the die hard Epsteiners only care about one thing now, using Epstein to get Trump. It is why Massie has made it his pet issue.

Rapier108 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Why would ANY of that be redacted? If this is real and we are not being massively trolled with these emails about torture rape and murder, F*** TRUMP...and F basically every politician on the left and right, aside from maybe 1 or 2. Anyone who protects these people in any way deserves unthinkable punishment.

If these are real emails, a good president would be absolutely raising hell.

This is truly how I feel seeing some of these emails:

---

Why should someone's name be dragged through the mud because Epstein sent him an e-mail?

Quote:

---

To: Bob
From: Jeff

Hi Bob, we met last week at that party for Jill's 50th birthday and talked about you possibly joining other inventors in a business venture I'm launching in the new year.

Wanted to see if you were still interested?

Jeff

******************************

To: Jeff
From Bob

Jeff, after careful consideration, I'm going to pass, but thanks for the offer.

Bob

---

Should Bob have his name thrown out there so the mob can go after him for absolutely nothing?

Talking to Epstein does not make someone guilty of a crime. Even doing business with him does not make someone guilty of a crime. Even if Epstein said someone did something illegal in an e-mail to himself, that is not proof of anything; certainly not enough to arrest someone.

Based on the majority of the posters in this thread, most of the die hard Epsteiners only care about one thing now, using Epstein to get Trump. It is why Massie has made it his pet issue.

---

I am talking about in the emails surrounding apparent abuse (or worse) of children. No one cares about the mundane things. There are tons of emails to/from Epstein that seem to heaviily imply rape/torture/murder.

Like the email I posted above of him apparently mocking a girl who thought Jesus would protect her from harm...unless completely fake, how on earth could that be construed in any normal fashion whatsoever?

In many of these highly disurbing emails, Epstein's name appears, but other individuals are redacted...even in emails where they are the ones basically confessing to evil and highly illegal sh**.

Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell says the convicted Epstein accomplice can clear President Trump's name in the Epstein probe in exchange for clemency. Follow live updates: https://t.co/yL3rj1Ds8N pic.twitter.com/DJg1D5xiVT

— CNN Breaking News (@cnnbrk) February 9, 2026