What do you think Iran's nuclear breakout time is now?

5,507 Views | 80 Replies | Last: 6 mo ago by David_Puddy
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teslag said:

rgvag11 said:

LOL. Sure they were.

And the give up.

I'm sorry, how are you going to prove this?

Quote:

China and russia were irritated that Iran ramped up enrichment

Yeah, I give up on your feelz debate.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Plenty of sources in my responses. Thanks for ignoring them.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Plenty" of sources = an X post and CNN. Great job
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David, No source is good enough to overcome your own biases.

ETA I also like how your argument went from ' no sources' to 'I don't like your sources'.
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgvag11 said:

Plenty of sources in my responses. Thanks for ignoring them.

From X and blowhard Medvedev? For real?
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgvag11 said:

David, No source is good enough to overcome your own biases.

ETA I also like how your argument went from ' no sources' to 'I don't like your sources'.

"sources"
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah. He's a nobody.

LOL
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgvag11 said:

Yeah. He's a nobody.

LOL

At this point yes, he is. Look at his rantings and ravings on the Ukraine war.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
David_Puddy said:

Your source - "trust me bro"

I don't expect you to think logically, but you really think Russia & China just saw our deceptive precision strikes and wants to f with our military? Hell Russia is losing thousands of soldiers per week just fighting with Ukraine.
Don't worry about that, they're used to it. Heck, I have to wonder if they still have their policy of one rifle per two soldiers, when the first is shot, the second picks up the rifle (and then is probably also shot).
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgvag11 said:

David, No source is good enough to overcome your own biases.

ETA I also like how your argument went from ' no sources' to 'I don't like your sources'.

You're claiming that Russia & China want to engage with not only Iran but us and you have "sources?" Not sure why I'm even entertaining this but do you sincerely believe that? Let me guess, you also believed that after Saturday, WW3 was about to start
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also, another point (which I know that you won't logically think about) is that we dropped 14-16 bombs on the nuclear sites (can't remember the exact #) and Iran just happened to send the same # of missiles to our military base. Which they gave us & Qatar ample warning that they were doing so so we could clear out of there beforehand. I know that you're trolling, but you can't sincerely believe that Iran is ready to engage with us in any sort of combat, whether that be by land, sea or air. Maybe with Israel, but we all saw how effective that was. If they continue to do so, then MOSSAD will continue to snipe all of their military heads one by one without many or any innocent civilian casualties.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.