California UIF rule on trans athletes - High school girls sports

7,547 Views | 83 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by Science Denier
Ridgeback85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am in favor of allowing trans athletes to compete as trans athletes. I just think they should do it within their biological group. Why is this complicated?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ridgeback85 said:

I am in favor of allowing trans athletes to compete as trans athletes. I just think they should do it within their biological group. Why is this complicated?
Its not, but its part of progressive ideoloy they be seen as real girls for some reason. Its one of the reasons voters rejected them (Democrats).

Good luck convincing Democrats of your position....
TexasAggiesWin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ridgeback85 said:

I am in favor of allowing trans athletes to compete as trans athletes. I just think they should do it within their biological group. Why is this complicated?
"Easy decisions do not come with theatre"
Zachary Klement
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is devoid of any logic.

If you are to argue that trans women are the same as real women, why would you make an exception to move biological women forward in a competition because they were knocked out by a trans girl? That seems to acknowledge that there is a difference there.
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zachary Klement said:

This is devoid of any logic.

If you are to argue that trans women are the same as real women, why would you make an exception to move biological women forward in a competition because they were knocked out by a trans girl? That seems to acknowledge that there is a difference there.
Shhhh, progs don't run on logic, only feelz.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.
That's because I have daughters.

Actual daughters - females from birth, XX chromosomes, able to have kids. You know - actual females. And I want them involved in athletics. Against other females, not mentally ill boys that couldn't hack it against other boys and instead of grinding and working harder to get better they decided to take the lazy way out and compete against girls to make themselves feel better.
schmellba99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Lot of assumptions in this thread.

I don't think biological men should participate in women's sports. This also isn't in my top 50 list of most important things that I want the federal government to focus on. What I find weird is that so many conservatives have made this one of their top 3 issues and spend so much time talking about it.
You have it completely backwards.

I'm guessing that isn't a surprise though.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaitShack said:

If I'm reading this correctly California is changing a rule to allow one additional athlete to advance to the next level. This is to offset the event where a girl gets bumped/beat out by a trans girl. Is this not an acknowledgement than trans women are not women? What happens if 2 trans folks are competing? Do they take an additional 2 along?

I'm sure my re-cap made no sense.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/27/newsom-transgender-athlete-00371572

Quote:

Under the new rules set out abruptly by the California Interscholastic Federation, which governs high school sports, athletes who were identified at birth as female and fell one spot short of making the cut for the upcoming statewide championship at qualifying meets around the state will now be allowed to compete.

Lol at the left having to come up with a workaround for their insane idea that men should be able to compete in women's sports.

This is a tacit admission that they really do understand how twisted and backwards their policies really are, but have painted themselves into a corner and can't say it to their hard left coalition members.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:

How about "boys compete with boys, even if they suffer from mental illness" ?
Only applies to sane people. California is run by insane morons.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.
Tell that to the Governor of California and future Democrat President hopeful
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biological men do not belong in women's sports. These biological males are taking away roster spots from biological females and finishing ahead of them in competitions because of their unfair genetic advantages, such as such as muscle mass and endurance, Also, biological females should not have to share locker rooms and showers with biological males. Transgender athletes should compete in a nonbinary category.

Democrats claim to advocate for the fairness and equality of women, but they fight for transgenders to compete in women's sports based on gender identity, emphasizing inclusivity, and equal opportunities. These Democrats are the true science deniers of biological reality, genetics, XX/XY chromosome science and they apparently have no qualms about transgender "women" (aka biological males) hijacking girls' and women's athletics and beating them at their own games. They claim to be for women's rights by advocating for on-demand abortion, but they disregard the fairness and safety of women's sports.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmellba99 said:

TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.
That's because I have daughters.

Actual daughters - females from birth, XX chromosomes, able to have kids. You know - actual females. And I want them involved in athletics. Against other females, not mentally ill boys that couldn't hack it against other boys and instead of grinding and working harder to get better they decided to take the lazy way out and compete against girls to make themselves feel better.
It's not the 20 mentally ill boys that are so much the concern. Rather, it's the 20 otherwise deserving biological female girls that are getting displaced.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cinco Ranch Aggie said:

BigRobSA said:

How about "boys compete with boys, even if they suffer from mental illness" ?
Only applies to sane people. California is run by insane morons.
I am from California, and I noticed how the liberal lunatics have continued to ruin the state. I am from Fremont, California, but I moved to Texas in August 2013. After graduating from Texas A&M in May 2017, I have continued to stay in Texas. My parents still live in Fremont, and I visit them twice a year. I have not looked back, and my parents actually encouraged me to move to Texas because of the high cost of living for a decreasing quality of life in California. I have always voted Republican and continue to do so.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would vote against this sham law faster than my 14-flat 100m. They acknowledge there's a difference, then refuse to do the right thing. No thanks. Girls don't need a wild card for accommodating a mediocre boy. They just need a level playing field. Period.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.

If it's "only" 20 mentally ill males involved, you'll forgive us if we don't upend women's sports to accommodate them.

The right was fine with the way things were. It sounds like it's the left that has the weird fixation.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why should boys compete with girls at all? Why should girls be forced to shower with boys?

Quote:

I don't think biological men should participate in women's sports. This also isn't in my top 50 list of most important things that I want the federal government to focus on. What I find weird is that so many conservatives have made this one of their top 3 issues and spend so much time talking about it.

If we can't call something what it is, there is no hope for dealing with complex issues.

There is nothing complex about gender. There are two choices. It is crazy that there is a Supreme Court justice too stupid to grasp the concept. That is fantasy land. We should not even entertain discussions on something so ****ing absurd.
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.


No, we think of the thousands that are affected by those 20, that cannot compete for a championship from the very beginning.

Why can't people understand that?
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Lot of assumptions in this thread.

I don't think biological men should participate in women's sports. This also isn't in my top 50 list of most important things that I want the federal government to focus on. What I find weird is that so many conservatives have made this one of their top 3 issues and spend so much time talking about it.


We care about our girls

Liberals don't

One Louder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

As Thomas Sewell once wrote, Communists don't push the fence down , they just keep moving it back until it's all theirs.


This. The left have always been masters of the long game. They make these incremental moves and when it finally gets the attention of conventional society, they ridicule the criticism as "trivial" or come up with an insult to shame people into shutting up about it.

Every once in a while, the backlash is too much and they pay a price for it but when they get back to the task at hand, they are starting further to the left than they did last time. In other words, even when they have to take one step back, they had already made two steps forward.

This isn't just about girls' amateur athletics. This is about denying reality and redefining the basics of society. Like another poster said, if we can't define the basics, we can't solve more complex problems.
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.

BaitShack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm confused. If a trans person wins, the runner up also gets 1st place? From another paywalled article.

Quote:

Hernandez beat out all other competitors in the triple jump, though the runner-up was also awarded 1st place under new rules established by the California Interscholastic Federation after Trump issued his threats.
newbie11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaitShack said:

If I'm reading this correctly California is changing a rule to allow one additional athlete to advance to the next level. This is to offset the event where a girl gets bumped/beat out by a trans girl. Is this not an acknowledgement than trans women are not women? What happens if 2 trans folks are competing? Do they take an additional 2 along?

I'm sure my re-cap made no sense.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/27/newsom-transgender-athlete-00371572

Quote:

Under the new rules set out abruptly by the California Interscholastic Federation, which governs high school sports, athletes who were identified at birth as female and fell one spot short of making the cut for the upcoming statewide championship at qualifying meets around the state will now be allowed to compete.

Completely the wrong way to handle the issue
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow, i was very impressed by her interview. Very well spoken for a high school senior.
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reminds me of My Cousin Vinny.

Vinny: I think I get the point … (with some attitude)

Judge: No, I don't think you do.

You can guess who is California and who is the judge. I hope they get kicked in the teeth for not protecting women sports.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Lot of assumptions in this thread.

I don't think biological men should participate in women's sports. This also isn't in my top 50 list of most important things that I want the federal government to focus on. What I find weird is that so many conservatives have made this one of their top 3 issues and spend so much time talking about it.


It's a politics / news aggregator message board that is online 24/7 with thousands of topics and hundreds of users. Do you understand how the internet works?

We are not limited to just 2-3 topics.
Henriques
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.
It wouldn't rank amongst my priorities. But no issue exemplifies the absolute ignorance and extremism of the Democrat Party and the American left than their infatuation with low-testosterone males using their limited advantages to win competitions they would never be able to win against their own gender. For many reasons, this particular bit of stupidity needs highlighting as standard Democrat Party/American leftist thinking on a wide variety of issues.

Regardless where this ranks with any of us individually, the fact this exists at all demands an extremely forceful legal rejection of it before it becomes pervasive throughout our society. It needs to be killed before it kills the entire concept of female athletics at all levels of competition amateur and professional.

If you don't believe this is important, then you have never had a daughter in competitive sport.

If Democrats no longer wish it to be an issue in elections, then perhaps they should consider returning to sanity and drop the psycho-babble gender quackery.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.


It's much bigger than whether 20 kids can play sports or not.

But you know.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaitShack said:

I'm confused. If a trans person wins, the runner up also gets 1st place? From another paywalled article.

Quote:

Hernandez beat out all other competitors in the triple jump, though the runner-up was also awarded 1st place under new rules established by the California Interscholastic Federation after Trump issued his threats.



It sounds like they've essentially relegated the males to an exhibition class in parallel with the girls. So, if a dude wins then the next best girl gets to win too to ensure the girls don't get displaced.

It's a passive aggressive, cowardly way to solve this.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How come no trans men compete in mens sports, if this is all about their supposed "right" to compete with the gender they identify as?

Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BadMoonRisin said:

How come no trans men compete in mens sports, if this is all about their supposed "right" to compete with the gender they identify as?




Good point. There's all the discussions from the left, most recently on CNN, on how there is no advantage for males playing female sports....

If that were the case, we're are all the transmen in men's sport winning titles?
Captain Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh BTW the male won 2 California girls state championships this weekend
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2 leagues. End the nonsense.

1) XX chromosomes.
2) Everyone else.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is going to kill the snake oil salesman's chance for POTUS. He was saying the right thing a few weeks ago but now is allowing this to happen. He done!
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TOUCHDOWN! said:

Y'all spend so much time thinking about whether or not 20 kids can play sports. It's super weird.
It's about doing the right thing. I'm sure you'd feel different if a naked dude was in the locker room with your daughter or seriously injured your daughter in a sport he had no business playing against women.
Just an awful take. I'm embarrassed for you.
AGpops1923
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a poised and courageous young lady for speaking out. As a proud grandpa of two young girls. I can't see where this issue will be in 5-10 years. If this continues, I see some verbal altercations in my future defending my girls.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.