Quote:

---

Well when is the damn Boasberg impeachment hearing going to happen?

---

nortex97 said:

---

Not sure why I am always disgusted when we agree.

---

Quote:

---

Once again democrat policies hurt the people the pretend to be helping. Are democrats ever not wrong?

---

agracer said:

---

…,,,…
Once again democrat policies hurt the people the pretend to be helping. Are democrats ever not wrong?

---

richardag said:

---

will25u said:

---

BREAKING - The government of El Salvador has denied a U.S.-based lawyer access to ten Tren de Aragua members she claims are her “clients” and is now stating that the government of El Salvador did not respect her clients’ “rights” to meet with a foreign lawyer.

— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) April 28, 2025

---

Who's paying for this lawyer and their bull*****
Need to track back those payments to ensure it wasn't the taxpayers.

---

Because POTUS can remove an acting US Attorney appointed by the Court, the two sides usually agree on who the individual is who gets appointed.

That's why most of the time it is not an outsider to the Office -- often times it is a "career" AUSA who has spent time in management… https://t.co/u8bdiSbTAK

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) May 7, 2025

agracer said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Democrats are morons. A large majority of the country wants us to secure our borders and have legal immigration only for those who go through the proper channels.

Allowing someone to just walk in and live here permanently is insane.

---

you voted for Biden.

---

Quote:

---

In the latest episode of legacy-media mental gymnastics, The New York Times argues that deporting criminal aliens somehow makes American communities less safe.

The article, written by Tim Arango, Hamed Aleaziz, and Miriam Jordan, first suggested that deporting criminal aliens is problematic because they might return to the United States "and commit more crimes."

Of course, that hypothetical assumes that the migrant could get back in, which would be a lot harder now that President Donald Trump has effectively shut down the southern border. The theory that the criminal migrant will return and "commit more crimes" only holds water if you plan on reopening the border which may be what Democrats do if they win in 2028.

Assistant District Attorney Ryan Brackley of Arapahoe County, Colorado, told the Times that he was prosecuting a case involving a migrant who allegedly pistol-whipped a victim. The migrant, Yerbis Manuel Garcia-Quintero, allegedly "sold gold and lent money to other immigrants, and used violence to collect debts," according to the Times. One of those beatings was caught on video and left the victim, Carlos Perez, bloodied and battered.

Despite being charged with several felonies, Garcia-Quintero posted bail and was set free, because nothing says "keeping communities safe" like giving an alleged violent alien a get-out-of-jail-for-the-right-price card.

Garcia-Quintero later failed to show up to court, however, because he was deported. This, somehow, is the tragedy according to the Times. Not that a foreign national came to this country to peddle Third World level lawlessness, nor that the same alien was then let out on bond despite the allegations stacked against him.

---

We now have 3 (?) District Court opinions on the legality of the invocation of the AEA and at least 2 (?) on the issue of the nature of the "due process" that is required.

These will all be appealed to the Circuits they are in.

My view now is that because this is a question of… https://t.co/ZUo174rEmn

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) May 9, 2025

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Once again democrat policies hurt the people the pretend to be helping. Are democrats ever not wrong?

---

Democrats only care about power. Illegals are only pawns in the game.

---

2/ Full order: https://t.co/iw4jKxwGq9

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 9, 2025

4/ The district court's order further illustrates problem with what SCOTUS did: SCOTUS an order barring an removal under AEA for plaintiffs that didn't exist because a class had not been certified (or not certified)...there was NO decision.

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 9, 2025

FlyRod said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Once again democrat policies hurt the people the pretend to be helping. Are democrats ever not wrong?

---

Democrats only care about power. Illegals are only pawns in the game.

---

Who has control of all three branches of the government at present? And most state governments as well? But tell me more about these…what did you call them, "Democrats?"

---

agracer said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

Democrats are morons. A large majority of the country wants us to secure our borders and have legal immigration only for those who go through the proper channels.

Allowing someone to just walk in and live here permanently is insane.

---

you voted for Biden.

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

These judges who have no jurisdiction and no power are not republicans. But you know that.

---

AggieVictor10 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

These judges who have no jurisdiction and no power are not republicans. But you know that.

---

Oh no, not checks on the executive

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

People who don't have jurisdiction do not have "checks." They're abusing their positions.

---

ETFan said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

People who don't have jurisdiction do not have "checks." They're abusing their positions.

---

You want an authoritarian government, just say it.

---

Judge Cedric Simpson held an unprecedented “evidentiary hearing” to determine if a Jewish prosecutor could prosecute Palestinian protesters based solely on the fact that the AG is a Jewish woman.

And when the Jewish Federation sent a letter to the court expressing shock at such… https://t.co/uO1AJ6LnKb pic.twitter.com/V9ZM7UD9Ef

— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) May 9, 2025

Today, I signed an Executive Order to launch the first-ever self-deportation program. Illegal aliens who stay in America face punishments, including—sudden deportation, in a place and manner solely of our discretion. TO ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS: BOOK YOUR FREE FLIGHT RIGHT NOW! pic.twitter.com/LO4eyfhZOq

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 10, 2025

ETFan said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

People who don't have jurisdiction do not have "checks." They're abusing their positions.

---

You want an authoritarian government, just say it.

---

FlyRod said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Once again democrat policies hurt the people the pretend to be helping. Are democrats ever not wrong?

---

Democrats only care about power. Illegals are only pawns in the game.

---

Who has control of all three branches of the government at present? And most state governments as well? But tell me more about these…what did you call them, "Democrats?"

---

txwxman said:

---

FlyRod said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Quote:

---

Once again democrat policies hurt the people the pretend to be helping. Are democrats ever not wrong?

---

Democrats only care about power. Illegals are only pawns in the game.

---

Who has control of all three branches of the government at present? And most state governments as well? But tell me more about these…what did you call them, "Democrats?"

---

Most of us on F16 want one party authoritarian rule. Freedumb

---

🚨 BREAKING - VICTORY: FIRST federal judge rules that Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan criminals is LEGAL.

U.S. District Judge Stephanie Haines made this decision. She is a TRUMP-appointed judge. pic.twitter.com/Pu73PLkYpu

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 13, 2025

So we have the first District Court to find that Pres. Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act was lawful -- in the Western District of Pennsylvania.

At least 2 (?) have come to the opposite conclusion, and a few others have begun to define what "due process" is required…

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) May 13, 2025

ETFan said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

People who don't have jurisdiction do not have "checks." They're abusing their positions.

---

You want an authoritarian government, just say it.

---

ETFan said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

People who don't have jurisdiction do not have "checks." They're abusing their positions.

---

You want an authoritarian government, just say it.

---

will25u said:

---

🚨 BREAKING - VICTORY: FIRST federal judge rules that Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan criminals is LEGAL.

U.S. District Judge Stephanie Haines made this decision. She is a TRUMP-appointed judge. pic.twitter.com/Pu73PLkYpu

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 13, 2025

---

Quote:

---

To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18, and we grant temporary injunctive relief to preserve our jurisdiction while the question of what notice is due is adjudicated. See post, at 13 (ALITO, J., dissenting). We did not on April 19and do not nowaddress the underlying merits of the parties' claims regarding the legality of removals under the AEA. We recognize the significance of the Government's national security interests as well as the necessity that such interests be pursued in a manner consistent with the Constitution. In light of the foregoing, lower courts should address AEA cases expeditiously.

---

Quote:

---

we really stepped in here, someone file something quickly so we can end this

---

Quote:

---

I read that as

Quote:

---

Quote:
we really stepped in here, someone file something quickly so we can end this

---

---

Quote:

---

JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS joins, dissenting. I cannot join the decision of the Court. First and most important, we lack jurisdiction and therefore have no authority to issue any relief. Second, even if we had such authority, the applicants have not satisfied the requirements for the issuance of injunctive relief pending appellate review. Third, granting certiorari before any decision on the merits has been made by either the District Court or the Court of Appeals is unwarranted. I A "Jurisdiction is power to declare the law," and "[w]ithout jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all." Ex parte McCardle, 7 Wall. 506, 514 (1869). So in order for us to do anything in this matter, "we must assure ourselves that we have jurisdiction." Abbott v. Perez, 585 U. S. 579, 594 (2018). The Court's theory of jurisdiction, as I understand it, is as follows. Under 28 U. S. C. 1254, we have jurisdiction to review a "case" that is properly before one of the federal courts of appeals. This case was properly before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit because the two habeas petitioners, A. A. R. P. and W. M. M., took an appeal from a District Court order that refused to issue "an injunction.

---