Trump to Invoke 1798 Alien Enemies Act

49,795 Views | 553 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by will25u
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:32a, 4/16/25
Bozoberg;


I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
3
damiond
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:34a, 4/16/25
lets purge the judge
Reply Quote
7
JayHowdy!
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:35a, 4/16/25
This is my shocked face.
Reply Quote
3
JFABNRGR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 11:38a, 4/16/25
AG
Im Gipper said:
Bozoberg;

WTF I thought the SC said he didn't have standing???

How does that work??
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Reply Quote
6
aezmvp
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to JFABNRGR • 11:42a, 4/16/25
Dude is the definition of bad behavior. Time to start some new case law. Johnson should be on this.
Reply Quote
9
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to JFABNRGR • 11:45a, 4/16/25
According to the Order, (not my words):


Quote:
Instead, it is a foundational legal precept that every judicial order "must be obeyed" no matter how "erroneous" it "may be" until a court reverses it. Walker v. City of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307, 314 (1967). If a party chooses to disobey the order rather than wait for it to be reversed through the judicial process such disobedience is punishable as contempt, notwithstanding any later-revealed deficiencies in the order. See id. at 314, 320. That foundational "rule of law" answers not just how this compliance inquiry can proceed, but why it must. See id. at 320. The rule "reflects a belief that in the fair administration of justice no man can be judge in his own case," no matter how "exalted his station" or "righteous his motives." Id. at 32021.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69741724/jgg-v-trump/

Document 81

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
1
KerrAg76
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:50a, 4/16/25
A liberal idiot with feelings always searching to save face. He's going down swinging but this could be his final hoorah. He's about to be told to sit down and shut up, if not resign or be removed
Reply Quote
6
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:52a, 4/16/25
AG
Boasberg is determined to be the belle of the ball on the DC cocktail circuit, isn't he?
Reply Quote
11
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:54a, 4/16/25
GOOD LUCK getting this to happen!

Quote:
The most obvious way for Defendants to do so here is by asserting custody of the individuals who were removed in violation of the Court's classwide TRO so that they might avail themselves of their right to challenge their removability through a habeas proceeding. See J.G.G., 2025 WL 1024097, at *2. Per the terms of the TRO, the Government would not need to release any of those individuals, nor would it need to transport them back to the homeland.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
2
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:04p, 4/16/25
AG
One of my thoughts is that Boasberg is doing this to put a scare into all the attorneys defending the government. Basically to deter/prevent them from challenging these cases brought against the government.

If you can't get DOJ attorneys willing to work on these cases out of fear they'll be unjustly held in contempt, then the left wins by default. The left doesn't play fair or by the rules.
Reply Quote
10
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:22p, 4/16/25
Time to impeach this anti Constitutional federal judge?
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
9
KillerAg21
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to richardag • 12:52p, 4/16/25
AG
Time to impeach our Anti Constitutional president! Kill all the birds with one stone
Reply Quote
1
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:55p, 4/16/25
Quote:
The next step would be for the Court, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to "request that the contempt be prosecuted by an attorney for the government." Fed. R. Crim. P. 42(a)(2). If the Government "declines" or "the interest of justice requires," the Court will "appoint another attorney to prosecute the contempt." Id.
So he's going to appoint a prosecutor if DoJ won't.

Cue the pardon pen!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
4
HoustonAg9999
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 12:59p, 4/16/25
Ag with kids said:
One of my thoughts is that Boasberg is doing this to put a scare into all the attorneys defending the government. Basically to deter/prevent them from challenging these cases brought against the government.

If you can't get DOJ attorneys willing to work on these cases out of fear they'll be unjustly held in contempt, then the left wins by default. The left doesn't play fair or by the rules.
Trump will just pardon all of them at end of this term
Reply Quote
6
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:35p, 4/16/25


US senator putting on a show like he going to rescue Nelson Mandela from prison.
Reply Quote
4
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to JFABNRGR • 1:41p, 4/16/25
Quote:
WTF I thought the SC said he didn't have standing???

How does that work??
He is just obstructing. Make no mistake, the only plan democrats have is to obstruct policies that are good for America.
Reply Quote
6
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KillerAg21 • 1:43p, 4/16/25
KillerAg21 said:
Time to impeach our Anti Constitutional president! Kill all the birds with one stone
The President is following the law. Boasberg is obstructing while knowing he doesn't even have jurisdiction. He is denying Americans the government they overwhelmingly voted for in November.

THAT is a threat to democracy.
Reply Quote
12
Queso1
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 1:46p, 4/16/25
AG
I didn't vote for deporting law abiding residents and sending the to El Salvador. I voted for mass deportation of illegals.
Reply Quote
2
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Queso1 • 1:49p, 4/16/25
Queso1 said:
I didn't vote for deporting law abiding residents and sending the to El Salvador. I voted for mass deportation of illegals.
Gang members are not "law abiding residents." And this guy beat up his wife.

Try again.
Reply Quote
19
swimmerbabe11
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Queso1 • 1:51p, 4/16/25
Queso1 said:
I didn't vote for deporting law abiding residents and sending the to El Salvador. I voted for mass deportation of illegals.

100%
Reply Quote
1
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:57p, 4/16/25
Y'all are demanding that illegal gang members have rights they do not actually have under our laws. Why?
Reply Quote
13
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 2:02p, 4/16/25
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:
Y'all are demanding that illegal gang members have rights they do not actually have under our laws. Why?
Under the AEA, what Trump and Rubio are doing is legal. People who don't like it, can try to get Congress to amend or repeal that statute.
Reply Quote
15
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Queso1 • 2:03p, 4/16/25
AG
Queso1 said:
I didn't vote for deporting law abiding residents and sending the to El Salvador. I voted for mass deportation of illegals.

That's what we're trying to do.
Reply Quote
11
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:06p, 4/16/25
AG
I just hope Republicans are paying attention, ESPECIALLY Republican appointed judges, so the next time a Dem POTUS tries, for instance, to fly in 50,000 Haitians to a small town in Ohio they will fight it every step of the way and obstruct as much as possible.

It shouldn't take Trump talking about dog and cat eating on a public debate to shine a light on the issue. There should have been a bright light on it the first time a Haitian was flown into this country.
Reply Quote
14
Matt Hooper
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:40p, 4/16/25
AG
Edit - wrong subject


Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Matt Hooper • 2:44p, 4/16/25
That's the other case, not the one in this court with Bozoberg!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Matt Hooper
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 2:46p, 4/16/25
AG
Thank you.
I got crisscrossed on threads.
Reply Quote
1
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:54p, 4/16/25
People still don't seem to understand that visas, green cards, LPR status and people admitted under asylum is conditional admission to the United States that can be revoked under a number of circumstances. Committing certain types of crimes can get you summarily deported. Also at the will of the executive authority controlling immigration which is also the case here.
Reply Quote
7
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 3:28p, 4/16/25
AG
aggiehawg said:
Ellis Wyatt said:
Y'all are demanding that illegal gang members have rights they do not actually have under our laws. Why?
Under the AEA, what Trump and Rubio are doing is legal. People who don't like it, can try to get Congress to amend or repeal that statute.
couldn't Trump simply pardon any criminal contempt?
Reply Quote
1
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Stat Monitor Repairman • 3:31p, 4/16/25
AG
Yes but everyone with a keyboard is a licensed immigration and constitutional law attorney nowadays. I
Reply Quote
1
MelvinUdall
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KillerAg21 • 3:34p, 4/16/25
KillerAg21 said:
Time to impeach our Anti Constitutional president! Kill all the birds with one stone


So you were proven wrong on the climate change thread you started and have yet to return and now you're wrong about this…color me shocked.
Reply Quote
8
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ThunderCougarFalconBird • 3:39p, 4/16/25
AG
Quote:
couldn't Trump simply pardon any criminal contempt?
I'd like to see how the judge words his final order on contempt and the referral. To whom does it specifically apply?
Reply Quote
2
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Stat Monitor Repairman • 6:44p, 4/16/25
Stat Monitor Repairman said:


US senator putting on a show like he going to rescue Nelson Mandela from prison.
Hope the President of El Salvador arrests him for aiding and abetting a known criminal and terrorist.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
4
richardag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KillerAg21 • 6:47p, 4/16/25
KillerAg21 said:
Time to impeach our Anti Constitutional president! Kill all the birds with one stone
Sarcasm duly noted.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Reply Quote
2
Noctilucent
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:02p, 4/16/25
AG
Anyone defending this gang banger, who happens to be an illegal alien and citizen of El Salvador, is bereft of their senses.

I'd like to see any of these nitwits defending this turd tell Rachel Morin's mother how he's such a great guy! Yeah, Maryland "Dad"!

Btw, wasn't Joe "Bidet" Biden a Senator for Maryland before he was installed as President of our country? Hmmmmmm, must be something in the water.
Reply Quote
3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.