***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

577,311 Views | 4055 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by We fixed the keg
Cru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sigh

Richard Nixon (bowling alley, 1973): Nixon had a one-lane bowling alley built under the North Portico. It was privately funded by friends (including Charles Rebozo, Robert Abplanalp, and Walter Annenberg) at a cost of about $40,700. This replaced or supplemented an earlier Truman-era alley. No congressional appropriation was needed for this private addition.

fordlibrarymuseum.gov

Gerald Ford (outdoor swimming pool, 1975): Ford installed an outdoor pool on the South Lawn after Nixon converted the indoor pool into the Press Briefing Room. It was fully privately funded (around $52,000$67,000 via donations, with limits per donor) to avoid using taxpayer money during a time of inflation and budget concerns. Construction proceeded without federal funds or apparent direct congressional approval for the build.

whitehousehistory.org

Harry Truman (balcony and earlier bowling alley): Truman personally funded the Truman Balcony addition from his household account. He also received the first White House bowling alley in 1947 as a gift (installed in the West Wing basement). These were modest and did not require congressional votes.

opb.org

Other minor additions: Presidents like Dwight Eisenhower (putting green), Barack Obama (basketball court conversion), and others made recreational or decorative changes, often with private or existing resources. Franklin D. Roosevelt's indoor pool (1930s) was funded by public/private campaigns and small donations, not direct congressional action for that specific feature.

Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump should just fire the judge. The authority is the same either way.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Appeal already in.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL. Think they were prepared for such a loony ruling? Apparently so.
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



Quote:

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington granted a preservationist group's request for a preliminary injunction that temporarily halts President Donald Trump's White House ballroom project.
Leon, who was nominated to the bench by Republican President George W. Bush, concluded that the National Trust for Historic Preservation is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims because "no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have."
"The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!" the judge wrote.

Leon suspended enforcement of his order for 14 days, acknowledging that the case "raises novel and weighty issues, that halting an ongoing construction project "may raise logistical issues." He also recognized that the administration is likely to appeal his decision.



Judge: I know this will be overturned but I just wanted to be famous for something/anything......and because, Trump!!
I don't think you know me.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NEWSFLASH: Parole can be revoked.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Obama judge. Guy has a history of blocking anything and everything Trump does if it goes before his court.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aezmvp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Standing is a magical th8ng. Unrelated parties have unlimited standing when it fits a judges political desires and if not... you have none. Serious reforms are desperately needed.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aezmvp said:

Standing is a magical th8ng. Unrelated parties have unlimited standing when it fits a judges political desires and if not... you have none. Serious reforms are desperately needed.

What is desperately needed is for Thune to get his thumb out of his backside and start confirming some judicial nominees to dilute the pool filled with liberals.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Quote:

Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) pummels DEI SCOTUS Justice Ketanji Jackson as a hypocrite, after she was the lone dissent in today's ruling against Colorado's ban on LGBTQ conversion therapy for kids

"To illustrate the total absurdity of Justice Jackson, she ruled last year that states *do not* have the right to ban child s*x changes, but ruled today that states *do* have the right to ban counselors from telling boys they are not girls."

She doesn't belong on the court.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So how will Talarico operate?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't want to make new thread.

Civil suit against Trump personally for J6...

txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deerdude said:

So how will Talarico operate?

That's (D)ifferent.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



Obama judge of course.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judge Allison Burroughs has a history with the Trump administration, and looks exactly as one would expect.

Birthright citizenship case piece might be worth working around the WSJ paywall;
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump will be at Scotus today for oral arguments re: his birthright citizenship EO, and the usual propagandists such as this CBS hack who undoubtedly knows even less about the constitution than KBJ are very upset about it.

Wish I could get to this piece:
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Quote:

The New Civil Liberties Alliance has reached a settlement in our The Daily Wire, The Federalist, Texas v. State Dep't lawsuit against State Department-funded censorship of American media. The Department acknowledges that our clients engaged in constitutionally protected speech concerning Covid-19, sexual ethics, the biological reality concerning sex, and election integrity. Defendants agree they will not use, finance, or promote technology that suppresses or fact-checks the constitutionally protected speech of Americans and domestic media outlets. The settlement also bars the State Department from working with foreign governments or NGOsformally or informallyfor those purposes. Representing The Daily Wire and The Federalist, NCLA celebrates this important victory safeguarding American free speech and press.

Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mathguy64 said:

So they want it put back. Go for it.

Tell the judges that if Trump loses the appeal, he'll just leave a huge pile of **** there the way it is right now.

And point out to the judges that there is NO ****ING way that any current makeup of Congress will approve a plan or even agree on anything to do with the current situation...probably for the next generation.

So, now the White House will have a huge pile of **** for decades. But, if that's what the courts want, go for it...

Congrats liberals...you've succeeded in making the WH look like a total piece of **** for generations.

But, at least you "GOT TRUMP!!!!!"
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?




will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting OLC opinion.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



Just remember that Parloff works at Lawfare...



That said, the attorneys filing the appeal make some good points...
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



Guess F. Dennis Saylor IV (Bush 43 appointee) forget all about the Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.

That said, the judge basically admits the Dept. of Education has the right to collect the data. Clearly he is just gumming up the works because he can.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



How DARE he criticize a STRONG BLACK WOMAN!!!!
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She doesn't even know she's a woman ...
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The CJ has brought a bit of structure to oral arguments -- at least to the beginning.

The Attorney takes 60-120 seconds to give a "30,000 foot" overview of his client's position.

The CJ then starts the questioning with Justice Thomas, and then goes in order of tenure on the Court.

Twice in the Birthright Citizenship case Justice Jackson jumped in ahead of her turn, and stepped on the answers to questions that were posed by Justices on the Court longer than she has been.

She first did it at page 23 of the transcript, while Gorsuch was in the middle of asking a question. He ignored her and kept asking his question.

She then did it to Justice Barrett -- trying to jump in after Justice Gorsuch finished, when Justice Barrett was next. Justice Kavanaugh opted to not ask any questions in the first round.

In fact, she did it twice to Barrett -- coming back and trying to interject a question again when Barrett was still asking questions during the first round.

When she did it a 3rd time, Barrett just let her go.

Her inability to control herself, and her seeming indifference to the protocol the others all respect are the kinds of little things that end up with you occupying the William O. Douglas seat on the Court.

KBJ doesn't even know the word "decorum".
First Page Last Page
Page 97 of 116
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.