BMX Bandit said:
I can answer that one.
Her buddying up to Assad;
Her love of the Obama Iran deal;
Her blaming Trump for Iran shooting down a passenger plane;
Her being mad Trump took out terrorist Soleimani;
That's a good list. Some remarks:
Her buddying up to Assad; = Depends on context. That's easy. He was quite manageable and better than ISIS. The drive to get rid of him partly created the European refugee disaster; repeating the Iraq mistake.
Her love of the Obama Iran deal; = That is serious. How could it have ever looked good--- unless just seen from the perspective she was just grateful for once Iran diplomacy not having the Bolton tone. Its important to remember what a bad taste the Bush-Cheney team left for just being bellicose and seemingly seeking more conflicts.
Her blaming Trump for Iran shooting down a passenger plane; = That's a solid point.
Her being mad Trump took out terrorist Soleimani; = That would be more interesting to know just what went into it --- its an easy call if you are some international law fan. Too controversial and out of the blue in a non-war situation. But that's just speculation. So two of those points require good answers for sure.
Edit: Perhaps more attention should be paid to the post itself --- what makes her good for DNI? Is that really a "house-cleaning" type position or more for an egghead, or even an American Putin? Is the post more arm-chair civilian in tone or `analytical autist' in tone?
