Incoming FCC Chair has a warning for Bob Iger

3,086 Views | 22 Replies | Last: 22 hrs ago by Gilligan
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I recommend reading the whole thing but some tidbits:

Quote:

"Dear Bob, Nice fake news network you have there. It would be a shame if anything were to happen to it. Love, Brendan."

That isn't quite what incoming FCC chair Brendan Carr wrote to Disney CEO Bob Iger this week, but it was pretty dang close.
Quote:

Carr has served on the Federal Communications Commission since 2017 and is President-elect Donald Trump's choice to serve as chairman next year.
Quote:

In an official FCC letter dated Dec. 21 (and just released on X by Rasmussen), Carr opened by reminding Iger that "Americans no longer trust the national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly" and that "ABC's own conduct has certainly contributed to this erosion in public."
Quote:

When we talk about trust in media, though, it is important to draw a distinction between national programming outlets like ABC," Carr continues, "and the many local broadcast TV stations that are working to serve their local communities. Indeed, Americans view those two types of media entities very differently." Viewers increasingly tune out ABC News and all the other big-name, three-letter outlets but still trust their KXXX or WXXX affiliate.

"It is against this backdrop the vast divide in trust between the national news media and local outlets that I write you today" because "My understanding is that ABC is attempting to extract onerous financial and operational concessions from local broadcast TV stations under the threat of terminating long-held affiliations, which could result in blackouts and other harms to local consumers of broadcast news and content."
Quote:

ABC wants to pull the programming you've been enjoying for free or as part of your existing cable package away from your local affiliate and stick it behind ABC's streaming paywall.

"This is not how Congress envisioned the retransmission consent process working," and the "massive trust divide has emerged between local news outlets and national programmers like ABC only increases the importance of retransmission consent revenues remaining available for local broadcast TV stations to invest in their local news operations and content that serves their communities." Carr sharply reminds Iger.
More:
Quote:

Not only does this raise localism concerns under the FCC's statutory public interest standard, but it calls into question the extent to which some national programming networks are able to influence station operations and whether the various terms of network affiliation agreements could unduly inhibit the ability of local broadcast TV stations to make programming decisions that best reflect the needs and interests of their communities.
Carr then moved on to this not-so-veiled threat to jerk ABC's broadcast license if they crack the whip on local stations: "If the network/affiliate relationship is jeopardizing either of those objectives, then the FCC will be compelled to act, particularly considering the American peoples' interest in trusted local news outlets."
LINK

That TV deal between the SEC and Disney not looking so great right now, if ABC decides sporting events cannot be shown on local affiliates.
TTUArmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not so-veiled threat...at all.
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did he send a similar latter to NBC? They put stuff on Peacock and expect me to pay for it even though I already pay for NBC. F them.
AnScAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:


That TV deal between the SEC and Disney not looking so great right now, if ABC decides sporting events cannot be shown on local affiliates.


Well looks like every conference tu joins immediately starts circling the drain. We'll see how long this one takes.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dmart90 said:

Did he send a similar latter to NBC? They put stuff on Peacock and expect me to pay for it even though I already pay for NBC. F them.
A letter needs to go to Netflix and Amazon, seeing as how they have football games that one has to get a membership just to watch.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
From same article.

Quote:

Carr goes into the details of ABC's negotiations, which are technical and probably not of much interest to laymen like you and me. But the crux is that "ABC is reportedly pulling the marquee programming, including local sports, from broadcast TV stations in favor of co-owned cable networks or those same subscription streaming services."
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

dmart90 said:

Did he send a similar latter to NBC? They put stuff on Peacock and expect me to pay for it even though I already pay for NBC. F them.
A letter needs to go to Netflix and Amazon, seeing as how they have football games that one has to get a membership just to watch.



Try again!

I'm Gipper
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dmart90 said:

Did he send a similar latter to NBC? They put stuff on Peacock and expect me to pay for it even though I already pay for NBC. F them.


Yeah, no EPL and other things on local NBC as much these days.

But what has ABC pulled behind streaming paywalls? Seems like the sports are all still there, at least?

He should go after it all or go after none, don't selectively enforce.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

No Spin Ag said:

dmart90 said:

Did he send a similar latter to NBC? They put stuff on Peacock and expect me to pay for it even though I already pay for NBC. F them.
A letter needs to go to Netflix and Amazon, seeing as how they have football games that one has to get a membership just to watch.



Try again!


Well that just sucks.

Oh well, Cest la vis
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see a lot of conservative comments on this thread. In summary, government should tell private business how to run their business and should give me everything like football for free.

Can someone remind me where the right to free football broadcasts can be found?!?!?

PS. The irony is that watching all these games started only after ESPN came around and it has always been a subscription service.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You didn't read the letter I see.

The right of people to free football broadcasts is in the same spot as ABC's right to use public airwaves. Neither exists!

I'm Gipper
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kansas Kid said:

I see a lot of conservative comments on this thread. In summary, government should tell private business how to run their business and should give me everything like football for free.

Can someone remind me where the right to free football broadcasts can be found?!?!?

PS. The irony is that watching all these games started only after ESPN came around and it has always been a subscription service.
Boy did you miss the forest for the trees. It's a public service licensing issue, not a free market issue.
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do you already pay for those services via some other mechanism? I already pay for ABC, CBS, and NBC. Why should I have to pay for their streaming services, too?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly!

I'm Gipper
bangobango
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Holy cow some of you really do not understand what is going on here.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Kansas Kid said:

I see a lot of conservative comments on this thread. In summary, government should tell private business how to run their business and should give me everything like football for free.

Can someone remind me where the right to free football broadcasts can be found?!?!?

PS. The irony is that watching all these games started only after ESPN came around and it has always been a subscription service.
Boy did you miss the forest for the trees. It's a public service licensing issue, not a free market issue.

Again go look at the comments to the OP saying even letters need to be sent to Amazon and Netflix about NFL games even though they use zero public airways bandwidth. People were commenting about the loss of sports broadcasting not the loss of watching The View. Why do people think that Disney has to put any specific content on the public airways vs on their streaming or cable networks. By definition there is no way they could put everything they have to show on the public airways because there aren't enough hours in the day.

I for one see no issue if the NFL or other sports go to an all streaming package for every game. It is their right to broadcast as many or as few of games as they see fit on whatever platform they choose.

I ask you who gets to decide what is shown on the local channels (which by the way are showing more games these days than ever)? The government or private enterprise. This issue between the local stations and ABC/Disney is between those parties and the only possible government involvement is the courts in case there is a contract breach.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Exactly!
What government can giveth (license to use public airwaves) the government can also taketh away for failure to abide by the terms of said license.
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why does the government get to decide what programming goes on the free channels vs. the paid channels. Seems like a reach.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Im Gipper said:

Exactly!
What government can giveth (license to use public airwaves) the government can also taketh away for failure to abide by the terms of said license.


To be clear, he's not really threatening to take licenses away. The local affiliates have the license.

He's threatening to intervene (in the contracts or some other way) between ABC and the local affiliates because he thinks ABC is making it too hard for the local affiliates with the licenses to make money.
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXAggie2011 said:

aggiehawg said:

Im Gipper said:

Exactly!
What government can giveth (license to use public airwaves) the government can also taketh away for failure to abide by the terms of said license.


To be clear, he's not really threatening to take licenses away. The local affiliates have the license.

He's threatening to intervene (in the contracts or some other way) between ABC and the local affiliates because he thinks ABC is making it too hard for the local affiliates with the licenses to make money.

The interesting thing here is let's say the government somehow pulled the public airways licenses, would it matter. How many people use an antenna these days to get the local channels. I know the answer isn't zero but it has to be close.
bmc13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
what really sucks are all the retransmission fee disputes.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hate despise SEC (conference). Whatever, ABC is fake news but no one is going to pay more to watch their national news. Sports is going to get more expensive to watch, inevitably imho.
Gilligan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When Family Feud has this question on the show:

Q: Things that are bad for you?

A: Smoking
A: Drinking
A: Drugs
A: The News...
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.