H1-Bs and Trump's AI advisor

41,935 Views | 779 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by jwoodmd
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nanomachines son said:



This is just one of the myriad of scams with the system. There are numerous other ways it can be done.



This is silly. If a big company is hiring 40k workers and paying 200k for them, they can easily be out performed by companies that hire high level workers for 150k directly.

The market fixes all this.

Is it bad how h1s restrict how the workers can move companies, yes. Fix h1, don't stop bringing in hard workers.
7nine
McKinney Ag69
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lost in all this discussion is the fact that the Overton window has completely shifted in the sense that we used to debate whether or not we should import tens of millions of central and South Americans and now it's a foregone conclusion that they are here and never going back.

The discussion is now about whether we should import tens of millions of Indians, Pakistanis, and people from Africa and the Middle East. Funny how things change. Now the average American would be happy if the just the former was the case and we only brought in Hispanics since they are majority Christian and generally assimilate easier into American society
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Loomer has entered the battle!






I'm Gipper
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is just a distraction and an end around to confuse solving the problem getting rid of the illegals.

Keep focus debating this problem of tech jobs while the real problem festers.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texaggie7nine said:

You guys are commie dems. You see other business owners businesses as your property and feel entitled to tell them how they can hire and what they can pay. Go vote for AOC already.
So if you don't want to import millions of third worlders from trash countries, knowing they will dilute your culture on top of everything, you're a communist dem?

El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VerdeAg said:

I love how the defense is that we want these jobs for whites only. I want them for any and all qualified AMERICANS (white, black, hispanic, Asian, etc…). Another leftists talking point shut down
This...they have this warped media and movie-sculpted caricature vision of us.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Laura Loomer changed her profile picture, which automatically removes the blue verified checkmark. It comes back after the person is reverified.

It feels like Loomer intentionally did this to ****-talk.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

Texaggie7nine said:

You guys are commie dems. You see other business owners businesses as your property and feel entitled to tell them how they can hire and what they can pay. Go vote for AOC already.
So if you don't want to import millions of third worlders from trash countries, knowing they will dilute your culture on top of everything, you're a communist dem?




He apparently can't figure out how to hire quality workers. I'd say his judgment isn't reliable at all or he's just some cube dweller with no actual experience on the topic talking out of his ass
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SwigAg11 said:

Laura Loomer changed her profile picture, which automatically removes the blue verified checkmark. It comes back after the person is reverified.

It feels like Loomer intentionally did this to ****-talk.
Nope. Not true. This affected many accounts and Loomer posted proof of the fraudulent ban.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gbaby23 said:


This is nails GayBaby23

El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gbaby23 said:


Sorry for quoting this again...but I would like to see just one person try to refute this...I'm bored...someone please tell me why it is a clown tweet...dunk all over it!
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRADUCTOR said:

This is just a distraction and an end around to confuse solving the problem getting rid of the illegals.

Keep focus debating this problem of tech jobs while the real problem festers.
Tom Homan has his head down and is already making arrangements. Elon and Vivek are trying to push their infinite indians scam while people are distracted.
VerdeAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charlie Kirk currently live giving his take.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


That didn't work out so well.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

Texaggie7nine said:

You guys are commie dems. You see other business owners businesses as your property and feel entitled to tell them how they can hire and what they can pay. Go vote for AOC already.
So if you don't want to import millions of third worlders from trash countries, knowing they will dilute your culture on top of everything, you're a communist dem?




The people at the top of companies don't care about culture, they only care about squeezing more profits any way they can.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
H1b Interns.

GE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nanomachines son said:



Americans are just lazy and stupid and don't want to work anymore!
Can anyone find the link to the live database with that in it? It says all years, curious how long ago
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

Texaggie7nine said:

You guys are commie dems. You see other business owners businesses as your property and feel entitled to tell them how they can hire and what they can pay. Go vote for AOC already.
So if you don't want to import millions of third worlders from trash countries, knowing they will dilute your culture on top of everything, you're a communist dem?




The people at the top of companies don't care about culture, they only care about squeezing more profits any way they can.
Agreed...this applies to capitalism as well imo...I have nothing but utmost contempt for almost all modern CEO's.

gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GE said:

Nanomachines son said:



Americans are just lazy and stupid and don't want to work anymore!
Can anyone find the link to the live database with that in it? It says all years, curious how long ago
https://h1bdata.info/
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All this outrage is fine, but I wonder if Trump will actually do anything, because we know the House and Senate wont...
VerdeAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BANNON FROM THE TOP

Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

gbaby23 said:


Sorry for quoting this again...but I would like to see just one person try to refute this...I'm bored...someone please tell me why it is a clown tweet...dunk all over it!


It's the same argument we've used against the current, woke "diversity is our strength and is the key to success" BS.

Non diversity built the greatest country and economy to ever grace planet Earth.
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lomez, a great X poster, is currently on with Charlie Kirk.

He was a professor at UC Irvine in the English department until he got doxxed as a right wing online figure. Very intelligent and well spoken.
Nanomachines son
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gbaby23 said:

They say you cannot effectively communicate with people 2SD outside of your IQ range, and social issues increase greatly above ~140

Guy can't have a fulfilling conversation with anyone under a 150IQ, if the score is accurate.


Now imagine being Leonhard Euler, the smartest man who ever lived, who had an estimated IQ of 210. He must have felt like extremely lonely in a world of blithering idiots.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks Blanco, I love this quote:



Interesting side note, Both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died on July 4, 1836. Jefferson just a few hours before Adams (I think). I believe John Adams last words were, "Thomas Jefferson survives" or something like that.

Edit to correct quote.
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or Chris Langan, he is good for a gem post every so often when he decides to go online.
gbaby23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was actually "Thomas Jefferson survives." but TJ had died a few hours earlier.

A great story. From friends to rivals to great friends in the end.
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gbaby23 said:

It was actually "Thomas Jefferson survives." but TJ had died a few hours earlier.

A great story. From friends to rivals to great friends in the end.
Thanks, I remembered and corrected the quote.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

gbaby23 said:


Sorry for quoting this again...but I would like to see just one person try to refute this...I'm bored...someone please tell me why it is a clown tweet...dunk all over it!


It's the same argument we've used against the current, woke "diversity is our strength and is the key to success" BS.

Non diversity built the greatest country and economy to ever grace planet Earth.
Not sure about this TBH. For better or worse, we used a lot of slave labor for generations...and also have used Chinese and Mexican labor since at least the 1800's. Would be interesting to see where we would be without that...hell, maybe it held us back in the long run.

Also, if non-diversity was the end all be all, the Asian countries would have been THE absolute indisputable world leaders for many many years, and still to this day.
Nanomachines son
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gbaby23 said:

Or Chris Langan, he is good for a gem post every so often when he decides to go online.


I'd question Langan's IQ. Given Euler's accomplishments, I would not with him. Euler's list is so long as to be almost comical. Half of the theorems in any intro to calculus books would be named after him if they didn't name the theory after the 2nd person to discover them because otherwise it would be too confusing trying to determine which Euler theorem someone was speaking about. "No no I mean Euler theory number 87 not 78!"
Brother Shamus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:



That didn't work out so well.


Acceptable casualties.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nanomachines son said:

gbaby23 said:

They say you cannot effectively communicate with people 2SD outside of your IQ range, and social issues increase greatly above ~140

Guy can't have a fulfilling conversation with anyone under a 150IQ, if the score is accurate.


Now imagine being Leonhard Euler, the smartest man who ever lived, who had an estimated IQ of 210. He must have felt like extremely lonely in a world of blithering idiots.
Genuine question, how do we estimate the IQ's of people who lived hundreds of yrs ago?

EDIT: Nvmd, your subsequent post answered my question
Sharpshooter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gbaby23 said:

It was actually "Thomas Jefferson survives." but TJ had died a few hours earlier.

A great story. From friends to rivals to great friends in the end.
I remembered this from the John Adams book by McCullough. I remember thinking, and still believe, the fact that TJ died first and that quote by Adams, as additional proof of afterlife. I truly believe Adams was seeing TJ as Adams passed.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gbaby23 said:

It was actually "Thomas Jefferson survives." but TJ had died a few hours earlier.

A great story. From friends to rivals to great friends in the end.
They called eachother things like "half-breed" and "hermaphrodite"...if they could mend fences, surely you and I can make this thing work.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.