I submit your conclusion is 100% correct based upon what has happened in the past, where diversity of thought was still present in the academia of old; however, tomorrow's "learned" historians will have been so thoroughly programmed for so long to bend factual norms & espouse only accepted narratives (however ludicrous) that it will take only the most courageous individuals to challenge such & be strong enough to weather the storm of peer condemnation, despite the presence of overwhelming incontrovertible facts on their side, to ever gain even a modicum of acceptance as even an 'alternative' theory. While your proposition may eventually be realized many, many decades later, I have a hard time believing (with my tinfoil hat firmly entrenched upon my head) that the same folks today who've disregard a thousand years of acceptance science about 'what defines a male vs. a female' in order to further a clearly politicized narrative can actually be counted upon to do the factually correct & morally responsible thing that'll be dictated by the available historical record.
Again, I mean no disrespect to you & pray you are right, but given the present climate & foreseeable future, I have zero faith such will be realized.
