Quote:

---

We found weak evidence of association between unprocessed red meat consumption and colorectal cancer, breast cancer, type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. Moreover, we found no evidence of an association between unprocessed red meat and ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. We also found that while risk for the six outcomes in our analysis combined was minimized at 0 g unprocessed red meat intake per day, the 95% uncertainty interval that incorporated between-study heterogeneity was very wide: from 0200 g d1. While there is some evidence that eating unprocessed red meat is associated with increased risk of disease incidence and mortality, it is weak and insufficient to make stronger or more conclusive recommendations.

---

Jabin said:

---

Red meat is not a health risk, and apparently all the studies claiming it is were based on shoddy research:

Health effects associated with consumption of unprocessed red meat: a Burden of Proof study | Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation

Quote:

---

We found weak evidence of association between unprocessed red meat consumption and colorectal cancer, breast cancer, type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. Moreover, we found no evidence of an association between unprocessed red meat and ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke. We also found that while risk for the six outcomes in our analysis combined was minimized at 0 g unprocessed red meat intake per day, the 95% uncertainty interval that incorporated between-study heterogeneity was very wide: from 0200 g d1. While there is some evidence that eating unprocessed red meat is associated with increased risk of disease incidence and mortality, it is weak and insufficient to make stronger or more conclusive recommendations.

---

ETA: Just saw that article is 2 years old, so sorry/not sorry if it has already been posted.

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Trust "The Science"!

Seems like The Science gets it wrong quite often. This is another example.

---

The Banned said:

---

I'd also add, eat fatty red meat. If you're willing to cut processed carbs, none of this stuff is bad for you.

The research determined this was bad for you because most of the red meat eaters they were researching also smoked, drank, ate sweets, etc.

---

Quote:

---

Our ancestors agree. According to archeologist, we were much healthier hunting and eating red meat, then after we settled down to a mostly vegetarian diet.

---

rocky the dog said:

---

---

YouBet said:

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

Early on in the pandemic I started eating NY Strips with raw spinach at least 4-5 times per week. Usually Chicken or Salmon for the other meals. The health benefits were tremendous.

---

Rich.

---

BigFred said:

---

AggieVictor10 said:

---

Carnivores stay winning.
Soy ****libs stay losing.
Buckle up.

---

Vegan here:

Red meat is known a class A carcinogen. Tofu and jack fruit are great subs.

Buckle up!

---