Tom Fox said:I guess that depends on whether you think we will be playing the same game 10 years from now. I do not. I'm looking for a short term strategic victory to reset the board.PanzerAggie06 said:Tom Fox said:PanzerAggie06 said:Tom Fox said:Then go after Collins. Have Elon and Co put billions into her challenger and have Trump campaigning against her weekly.BMX Bandit said:
The only senators up in 2026 that might go against Trump on nominations are more worried about a general election than the primary. Like Collins & Tillis
Hell if you lose the primary, stump for democratic opponent.
Send the message.
Primary Collins and you put a Democrat in her seat. She's as good as it gets in regards to Republicans when it comes to Maine. She's votes with the GOP about 91% of the time. I'll take that.
Nope put her to pasture and make an example.
That's some brilliant political strategy. Truly first rate thinking.
Replace a GOP Senator who votes with the party an overwhelming percentage of the time with a liberal to "send a message". Who the actual **** is suppose to receive this message? Other somewhat moderate Republican Senators whom if they suddenly vote hard right will lose their seats also to liberals? Yep, let's give the Senate to the Dems again… quite the message you want to send.
Giving the Dems the Senate is somehow a strategic victory? Interesting.
Either way you haven't thought this through… clearly. Collins and Murkowski aren't up for reelection until 28' which is a lifetime in politics. Thus they have more than enough time to survive any petulant attempts to dethrone them. And the notion that Alaska and Maine are suddenly going to change their voting habits based on one election cycle is a bit naive. Trends are hardly determined on one nights vote. Time will tell. I hope the nation is shifting right but it's way too soon to pop the cork on the champagne bottle.