I never agree with InfectionAg but this is spot on.Infection_Ag11 said:aggie93 said:Lose the House and lose the Leg agenda for Trump.Infection_Ag11 said:Aggie_2463 said:I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?Infection_Ag11 said:
Surprised by the senate being only 82%
It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.
The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
Personally I prefer a lot of deadlock at the federal level. My ideal scenario is always the republicans controlling the presidency and one house of congress, preferably the senate, while the democrats control the other. Allows for a republican to wield the executive powers while keeping government expansion via long lasting policy to a minimum.