*****OFFICIAL 2024 ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

1,113,628 Views | 8902 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by will25u
WhoopN06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

aggie93 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?


Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.

The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
Lose the House and lose the Leg agenda for Trump.


Personally I prefer a lot of deadlock at the federal level. My ideal scenario is always the republicans controlling the presidency and one house of congress, preferably the senate, while the democrats control the other. Allows for a republican to wield the executive powers while keeping government expansion via long lasting policy to a minimum.
I never agree with InfectionAg but this is spot on.
the most cool guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWAppraiser said:

Yep

Nice. Not arguing, but any data to back that up?
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?


Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.

The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
I don't really mind gridlock.

Senate & Presidency would suffice.


I agree
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

oh no said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
yeah; senate should be closer to 95% just because of MT and WV alone, right? ...or is Cruz in trouble in TX? even if so, Moreno in OH should cover.

...concerning the house could be flipping though..


Cruz is fine

The only question regarding the senate is whether republicans have 51, 52, 53 or 54 seats. Looking more and more like 52 is probably what it will be.

If I was betting on it, I'd bet on the house to flip. If Kamala wins the general it's definitely going to flip because she will bring more over the finish line than Trump will be able to just based on where the races are.


I think where the house polling gets dicey is turnout. If Ds are not turning out for districts bordering urban areas that are competitive, the polling means nothing. I am cautiously hopeful that we keep the house.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just tried this. It is true.

the most cool guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

aggie93 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?


Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.

The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
Lose the House and lose the Leg agenda for Trump.


Personally I prefer a lot of deadlock at the federal level. My ideal scenario is always the republicans controlling the presidency and one house of congress, preferably the senate, while the democrats control the other. Allows for a republican to wield the executive powers while keeping government expansion via long lasting policy to a minimum.

I don't usually agree with you, but I agree here. If the only thing that happens over the next four years is that Congress does almost nothing, and Trump dismantles the federal bureaucracy, closes the border, unwinds Biden's executive orders, and maybe appoints another SC justice, that is fine by me.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?


Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.

The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
I don't really mind gridlock.

Senate & Presidency would suffice.


I agree


As long as we keep the Senate, we keep the ability to get Trump judges confirmed.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WhoopN06 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

aggie93 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?


Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.

The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
Lose the House and lose the Leg agenda for Trump.


Personally I prefer a lot of deadlock at the federal level. My ideal scenario is always the republicans controlling the presidency and one house of congress, preferably the senate, while the democrats control the other. Allows for a republican to wield the executive powers while keeping government expansion via long lasting policy to a minimum.
I never agree with InfectionAg but this is spot on.

Generally I'd agree but we really need a full GOP sweep of control so that they can wind back the last four years legislatively (and wipe all of Biden's executive orders).

Plus do some election reform to address the nonsense of the last two elections.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gigemJTH12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iraq2xVeteran said:

I think Ted Cruz will beat Colin Allred 52% to 47% in another close reelection bid to a 3rd term in the Senate, and the results will be announced by 10:00 PM.


We need to get Ted Cruz the hell out of their before next election before he loses
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A lot of curing to do

oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?


Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.

The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
I don't really mind gridlock.

Senate & Presidency would suffice.


I agree
I disagree... then we'd have to put up with more impeachments.
StandUpforAmerica
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gigemJTH12 said:

Iraq2xVeteran said:

I think Ted Cruz will beat Colin Allred 52% to 47% in another close reelection bid to a 3rd term in the Senate, and the results will be announced by 10:00 PM.


We need to get Ted Cruz the hell out of their before next election before he loses
For someone who supposedly isn't likeable, he just keeps on winning.
Cru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Yep. That.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is it just me or is other % tracking very high?

Is this the new steal algorithm under the guise voters didn't like either candidate!
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Leander
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
while florida and nevada results are great, PA is quite literally the state that will decide the election.

any news there?
Leander
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Lol. Trump going to disallow history books folks.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leander said:

while florida and nevada results are great, PA is quite literally the state that will decide the election.

any news there?
Nothing on PA until this evening except for pictures of lines in whatever counties.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So far lots of pictures of dudes standing in line
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheEternalOptimist said:

FTAG 2000 said:

Dems were running ads threatening lawyers with disbarment in swing states if they helped Trump.

It's obvious the Dems are going to drag this thing into court to be decided.
And if they steal this thing.... the people will rise up and drag them elsewhere.



Nobody is going to "rise up", give me a break.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
StandUpforAmerica said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Aggie_2463 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

Surprised by the senate being only 82%

It's a near mathematical impossibility at this point for the republicans to not have at least 51 senate seats after today
I haven't been following the house race, are we in danger of losing the majority there?


Yes, in fact if you look at the individual races it would be a mild surprise if the democrats don't achieve a very slight majority in the house. Republicans have to either pull a few mild upsets, or sweep 5 genuinely 50/50 races.

The problem is so many close races this year in the house are in purple districts within blue states, or blue districts in red states. So Trump will have a hard time carrying many of these races over the finish line even if he wins.
I don't really mind gridlock.

Senate & Presidency would suffice.


I agree
I disagree... then we'd have to put up with more impeachments.


That will go nowhere and just further frustrate the American electorate with democrats for the next election.

Hardly a scenario worth losing sleep over
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alrighty... Here are my predictions on the states we have information on... Not that what I think means a damn.

FLORIDA IS RED! (110%)
ARIZONA IS RED! (100%)
NEVADA IS MEDIUM RED! (>75%) Likely Republicans have too high of a lead before ED for Dems to overcome, even with an extra 3 days for (no postmark)mail.
1836er
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

From CNN exit polling, Independents broke 50% Biden, 44% Trump in NV. in 2020
Unfortunately, the latest NYT and Emerson polls don't have the crosstabs available for free, but the latest Atlas poll does.

Latest AtlasIntel poll for NV: Trump winning crossover voters by 4.5% and Trump winning independents by 5.4%.

If these splits are to be believed Dems in NV would have to outvote Reps by a considerable margin because they're losing independents and crossover voters according to AtlasIntel.
Vance in '28
Ginormus Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any exit poll data? Or will there not be any announced until polls close? I remember in 2004 exit polls coming out at about 2:00 pm heavily favoring Kerry and the media going orgasmic.
McInnis 03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Eric Hovde (WI-R Sen Candidate) just said on Clay & Buck that Madison Dem turnout is solid and expected but that Milaukee Dem turnout is supressed and that's a bit surprising.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JFABNRGR said:

Is it just me or is other % tracking very high?

he guise voters didn't like either candidate!
It's been well documented that lots of people struggle to vote for either.
gigemJTH12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Serious question..

Why are we just assuming the Others will vote for trump?

ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leander said:

while florida and nevada results are great, PA is quite literally the state that will decide the election.

any news there?
Partly correct.

You must be assuming Fla is Trumps because it is much bigger than PA with 30EV's and 23,000,000 pop

GA 16, 11,400,000
NC 16, 11,100,000
PA 19, 12,700,000

Those three dwarf the rest of the BG's. Take those and its over.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Alrighty... Here are my predictions on the states we have information on... Not that what I think means a damn.

FLORIDA IS RED! (110%)
ARIZONA IS RED! (100%)
NEVADA IS MEDIUM RED! (>75%) Likely Republicans have too high of a lead before ED for Dems to overcome, even with an extra 3 days for (no postmark)mail.


That's all good and well but still need a Midwest state to go red
First Page Last Page
Page 23 of 255
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.