BLM lied.

Yeah, that's all they do.

annie88 said:

---

BLM lied.

Yeah, that's all they do.

---

They also grift a lot of money.

annie88 said:

---

BLM lied.

Yeah, that's all they do.

---

Well, that and buy big houses with donations from Concerned Moderates.

BLM activists are saying she should have been tazed or subdued with a stun gun.

"Sydney Wilson should have been tazed, instead, but of course, she was black, so they took her out," according to the post.

Georgetown is honoring her.

https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/georgetown-faces-backlash-for-honoring-former-basketball-player-who-attacked-officer-sydney-wilson-police-cop-body-worn-camera-video-footage-welfare-check

I have timestamped the Matt Walsh news report and analysis



It is under the chapter: BLM Activists Mourn Woman Who Died Trying To Stab An Officer To Death

Walsh says: body cameras shut down another BLM narrative before it even gets started.

TheWoodlandsTxAg said:

---

BLM activists are saying she should have been tazed or subdued with a stun gun.

"Sydney Wilson should have been tazed, instead, but of course, she was black, so they took her out," according to the post.

Georgetown is honoring her.

https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/georgetown-faces-backlash-for-honoring-former-basketball-player-who-attacked-officer-sydney-wilson-police-cop-body-worn-camera-video-footage-welfare-check

---

BLM is not mentioned in that article.

He says it, but there's no citation or tweet or statement or anything else to back it up. It's no different than the OP.

So there was a Tweet mourning her loss, but with no mention of the details. Again, this whole case seems to have gone under the radar until the bodycam video was released.

I wish you better luck tomorrow in finding actual BLM outrage, outrage that predates the video release.

Are we going to find out that black lives matter was a socialist Marxist organization that the killing of George Floyd was preemptive and set up

And all of it was b*******

Done to get money transferred from certain organizations to others to make people rich just like all Marxist organizations are

This whole narrative of because she was black she was shot is getting really old. Do you know who gets shot? People who resist arrest or try to attack cops. I don't give a rats ass what color they are. I am so sick of this constant racism from the left. It's literally all they live for.

annie88 said:

---

This whole narrative of because she was black she was shot is getting really old. Do you know who gets shot? People who resist arrest or try to attack cops. I don't give a rats ass what color they are. I am so sick of this constant racism from the left. It's literally all they live for.

---

Yes, I know. You can find plenty of my posts about it over the years when police shootings get brought up. This shooting was completely justified and the cop should have shot sooner than he did.

The point I and others have been making is that the OP claimed "BLM lied about Sydney Wilson" and yet there is no evidence BLM, or any group calling itself BLM, said a peep about it. The basketball team she played for in college said something, and random people on social media did, but that is not "BLM."

The only people who are bringing BLM into this are people on the right. In this case, BLM did the smart thing and stayed out of it because it was not one they could score any points off.

Muy said:

---

frenchtoast said:

---

All I see is a proud lioness gunned down in the prime of her life.

---

Excuse me, but that is a Nigerian Queen!

---

Either way, that guy should have shot her in the dick.

weird seeing people defend BLM here

Quote:

---

LM activists are saying she should have been tazed or subdued with a stun gun.

"Sydney Wilson should have been tazed, instead, but of course, she was black, so they took her out," according to the post.

Georgetown is honoring her.

https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/georgetown-faces-backlash-for-honoring-former-basketball-player-who-attacked-officer-sydney-wilson-police-cop-body-worn-camera-video-footage-welfare-check

---

jr15aggie said:

---

Pretty sure I would have fired much sooner than the cop did! Cannot believe that this was ever spun as an unjust killing. What is wrong with these people!

---

Got to get the faux outrage machine spooled up for the election.

No one is defending BLM.

People are saying the OP's claim about BLM going off about this shooting since it happened is false and he has yet to provide any proof otherwise.

That's a crazy video. Went from 0 to 100 in a nanosecond. Good reminder to keep one in the chamber if you're gonna carry.

Rapier108 said:

---

No one is defending BLM.

People are saying the OP's claim about BLM going off about this shooting since it happened is false and he has yet to provide any proof otherwise.

---

see my post they did

Would have been cooler if the officer put his gun down and pulled out his knife.

schmellba99 said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Should have shot sooner, but also shows that 9mm just doesn't always get the job done right away, and why a mag dump is often necessary.

If I was a cop, I'd be carrying a 10mm or a .45ACP.

---

It pretty much doesn't matter, especially with pistol caliber rounds out of a pistol platform. All perform very close to the same, and things like this show that the hollywood acting when getting shot is just that - acting and special effects.

You need structural or CNS system damage to put somebody down quickly. Anything other than that and they have the ability to continue moving and attacking or fighting until bleedout comes into play.

---

Man didn't NW80 teach you anything?

If I remember it right, 9mm victims were in a panic. .45 victims were docile.

BLM is built on lies

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

GoAgs11 said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

No one is defending BLM.

People are saying the OP's claim about BLM going off about this shooting since it happened is false and he has yet to provide any proof otherwise.

---

see my post they did

---

Nope, try again.

As I told the OP, BLM is not mentioned in the article from Mynbc15.

Despite the fact he altered the quote from the article about the stun gun, BLM is never once mentioned.

The actual quote about the stun gun is this.

"A few defended Wilson. On Facebook, one person said Wilson should not have been killed but subdued by a stun gun."

Basically the OP, and now you, are saying anyone who said anything about shooting that wasn't on the side of the police must be "BLM", but have not presented any evidence to back up that claim. Some random person on Facebook, or a basketball team is not "BLM."

IndividualFreedom said:

---

Would have been cooler if the officer put his gun down and pulled out his knife.

---

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

Because it would be utter insanity for BLM to have done this, amiright?! lol, maybe society is absolutely worn down from BLM and LGBT bull**** and lies, and OP's post would have been one of the least crazy things they have ever gotten fake outraged over.

Muy said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

Because it would be utter insanity for BLM to have done this, amiright?! lol, maybe society is absolutely worn down from BLM and LGBT bull**** and lies, and OP's post would have been one of the least crazy things they have ever gotten fake outraged over.

---

hilarious people defending BLM you know what their stance is on this.

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

What difference does it make if they are officially BLM associated? Is that technicality really meaningful? Are we going to let the people who push Race hoax's off the hook because the perpetrators were not super duper official BLM card caring members?

Or is it an opportunity for said concerned moderates to virtue signal to the rest of us how much smarter they are than everyone else because they never ever would ever fall for stuff?

1.Thing didn't happen ( In this case the claim was BLM supporters pushed something.)
2.Thing happened but it wasn't as bad as people say (We are here) (Well it was pushed, but they were not official BLM people)
3.It's actually a good thing that thing happened (We are not yet here)
4.SHUT UP RACIST! (Soon we will be here)

GoAgs11 said:

---

Muy said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

Because it would be utter insanity for BLM to have done this, amiright?! lol, maybe society is absolutely worn down from BLM and LGBT bull**** and lies, and OP's post would have been one of the least crazy things they have ever gotten fake outraged over.

---

hilarious people defending BLM you know what their stance is on this.

---

Leftist goaltenders find an error and hold onto it as if it actually matters. I argue that most hard core leftists are on the spectrum and lack common sense and the ability to see the full picture.

and CM's/gullible right wingers sympathize to make themselves feel better about being moderately right wing.

They would hate to be accused of being actually right wing.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

What difference does it make if they are officially BLM associated? Is that technicality really meaningful? Are we going to let the people who push Race hoax's off the hook because the perpetrators were not super duper official BLM card caring members?

Or is it an opportunity for said concerned moderates to virtue signal to the rest of us how much smarter they are than everyone else because they never ever would ever fall for stuff?

1.Thing didn't happen ( In this case the claim was BLM supporters pushed something.)
2.Thing happened but it wasn't as bad as people say (We are here) (Well it was pushed, but they were not official BLM people)
3.It's actually a good thing that thing happened (We are not yet here)
4.SHUT UP RACIST! (Soon we will be here)

---

Whe. You said 'what difference does it make' You just asked me 'what difference does it matter if it is true or not'. Thats just crazy.

I will admit. I can't argue with any of that.

If I had anything for you it would be to take a step back, calm down a bit, and try to be more rational about all of this. I mean, we are on the same side, but truth and accuracy have to matter. If they don't than it's all lost.

agsalaska said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

What difference does it make if they are officially BLM associated? Is that technicality really meaningful? Are we going to let the people who push Race hoax's off the hook because the perpetrators were not super duper official BLM card caring members?

Or is it an opportunity for said concerned moderates to virtue signal to the rest of us how much smarter they are than everyone else because they never ever would ever fall for stuff?

1.Thing didn't happen ( In this case the claim was BLM supporters pushed something.)
2.Thing happened but it wasn't as bad as people say (We are here) (Well it was pushed, but they were not official BLM people)
3.It's actually a good thing that thing happened (We are not yet here)
4.SHUT UP RACIST! (Soon we will be here)

---

Whe. You said 'what difference does it make' You just asked me 'what difference does it matter if it is true or not'. Thats just crazy.

I will admit. I can't argue with any of that.

If I had anything for you it would be to take a step back, calm down a bit, and try to be more rational about all of this. I mean, we are on the same side, but truth and accuracy have to matter. If they don't than it's all lost.

---

I just dont get the point of constantly correcting your own side and running interference for the other. Which many of the usual suspects do.

TxAgPreacher said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

What difference does it make if they are officially BLM associated? Is that technicality really meaningful? Are we going to let the people who push Race hoax's off the hook because the perpetrators were not super duper official BLM card caring members?

Or is it an opportunity for said concerned moderates to virtue signal to the rest of us how much smarter they are than everyone else because they never ever would ever fall for stuff?

1.Thing didn't happen ( In this case the claim was BLM supporters pushed something.)
2.Thing happened but it wasn't as bad as people say (We are here) (Well it was pushed, but they were not official BLM people)
3.It's actually a good thing that thing happened (We are not yet here)
4.SHUT UP RACIST! (Soon we will be here)

---

Whe. You said 'what difference does it make' You just asked me 'what difference does it matter if it is true or not'. Thats just crazy.

I will admit. I can't argue with any of that.

If I had anything for you it would be to take a step back, calm down a bit, and try to be more rational about all of this. I mean, we are on the same side, but truth and accuracy have to matter. If they don't than it's all lost.

---

I just dont get the point of constantly correcting your own side and running interference for the other. Which many of the usual suspects do.

---

Because when you make an argument based on a lie or incorrect information it is not logically defendable. It's not necessary and makes you not credible in any educated debate. It may work for the masses but lot with educated people. Or courts. Or reporting.

I used to tell managers all the time when dealing with tough customers 'don't do anything I can't defend.' Lying or misrepresenting someone's position is not defendable, even if you are right.

agsalaska said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

TxAgPreacher said:

---

agsalaska said:

---

torrid said:

---

jagvocate said:

---

BLM is built on lies

---

So is this thread.

---

Right,

So if I read this thread right the logic went something like.... Link BLM to a story where there is no known associations.....get called out for making that link......people who call it out get blamed for defending BLM....of course concerned moderates.

But the most important goal for the OP is that at least some people read it and believed it. Truth doesn't matter. It happens all day every day on this board.

---

What difference does it make if they are officially BLM associated? Is that technicality really meaningful? Are we going to let the people who push Race hoax's off the hook because the perpetrators were not super duper official BLM card caring members?

Or is it an opportunity for said concerned moderates to virtue signal to the rest of us how much smarter they are than everyone else because they never ever would ever fall for stuff?

1.Thing didn't happen ( In this case the claim was BLM supporters pushed something.)
2.Thing happened but it wasn't as bad as people say (We are here) (Well it was pushed, but they were not official BLM people)
3.It's actually a good thing that thing happened (We are not yet here)
4.SHUT UP RACIST! (Soon we will be here)

---

Whe. You said 'what difference does it make' You just asked me 'what difference does it matter if it is true or not'. Thats just crazy.

I will admit. I can't argue with any of that.

If I had anything for you it would be to take a step back, calm down a bit, and try to be more rational about all of this. I mean, we are on the same side, but truth and accuracy have to matter. If they don't than it's all lost.

---

I just dont get the point of constantly correcting your own side and running interference for the other. Which many of the usual suspects do.

---

Because when you make an argument based on a lie or incorrect information it is not logically defendable. It's not necessary and makes you not credible in any educated debate. It may work for the masses but lot with educated people. Or courts. Or reporting.

I used to tell managers all the time when dealing with tough customers 'don't do anything I can't defend.' Lying or misrepresenting someone's position is not defendable, even if you are right.

---

Some people did try to misrepresent the shooting as a tragedy, and although they were not proven to be BLM, they acted the same way BLM acts.

It would be like anti facisism protestors causing problems then denying they are antifa because they arent officially a part of an antifa organization.

Calling them BLM may have been sloppy, but they are BLM types. I don't get why we have to pretend they arent.