Texas Tea said:It just means more.20ag07 said:
The same people who heard the term "affidavit" and went crazy that that meant something will now see "SEC" and think that means something.
ABC whistleblower
33,917 Views |
226 Replies |
Last: 18 days ago by BMX Bandit
Well this fizzled out.
I'm Gipper
I'm Gipper
Either it was always BS or dude got a bag to STFU.Im Gipper said:
Well this fizzled out.
Im Gipper said:
Well this fizzled out.
Well when the MSM will neve touch it and more honest media doesn't know how to hold someone's feet to the fire...
ABC's original denial was weak as hell was was phrased in a way not to deny 90% of what was in the alleged affidavit. That alone should have pressed any media that cared to dig much more into this.
We knew MSM wouldn't care.
Conservative media also dropped it quickly.
Speaker Johnson, other MAGA in Congress all ignored it!
I'm Gipper
Conservative media also dropped it quickly.
Speaker Johnson, other MAGA in Congress all ignored it!
I'm Gipper
20ag07 said:You don't think there are plenty of places that would dig into this, if this were actually a thing with any legitimacy?Quote:
ABC's original denial was weak as hell was was phrased in a way not to deny 90% of what was in the alleged affidavit. That alone should have pressed any media that cared to dig much more into this.
People, including alleged "attorney"s, who should know better, got drawn off sides by wishful thinking.
There was never anything here.
I don't. Matt Taibbi explains that the profession of journalism has morphed in a few short years from digging to uncover evidence and report the story to looking the other way for fear of being fired for it. Scientists and especially physicians are afraid of deviating from the party line of the CDC, AMA, and APA for fear of having their certifications revoked and their career terminated for following the scientific method. Judges are scared to hear evidence in cases that would subject them and their families to a 24/7 spotlight and peraonal destruction campaign that would make the demonization of the Florida Supreme Court and SecState Katherine Harris in the afternath of Gore v Bush looks friendly and collegial by comparison.
Our institutions have been thoroughly captured. Trump was corrupted by Russian influence until it was all determined to be a Clinton Campaign hoax. Hunter's laptop was a disinformation campaign until it wasn't. The whistleblower claims will be proven 100% accurate after the election and the media will refuse to publish the news. The identity of the person whose DNA is on the baggie of cocaine found in the White House will be revealed after Biden is out of office.
How do you not see the template as it has been applied 100 times?
Because she doesn't tweet mean stuff and call people names.
There are plenty of media arms that would still capture this if it was a thing.
They aren't, because it's not a thing, and never was.
Some people heard the term "affidavit", said that must be "important" (though it wasn't), and here we are.
They aren't, because it's not a thing, and never was.
Some people heard the term "affidavit", said that must be "important" (though it wasn't), and here we are.
sam callahan said:
But does she hate Taylor Swift?
Is Trump the only person that can do that and not be affected in the polls?
Dude is bulletproof this cycle
Quote:
Matt Taibbi explains that the profession of journalism has morphed in a few short years from digging to uncover evidence and report the story to looking the other way for fear of being fired for it.
That explains why legacy media and the cnn and foxnews types didn't run with this story. But why didn't Taibbi?
Tucker Carlson?
Matt Walsh?
Why isn't Cruz sounding the bell on this? Hawley? Comer? Jordan?
Sometimes stories are just made up. We've seen in 100s of times. Though interestingly if it was alleged FoxNews was giving Trump the questions for a debate, every legacy media outlet would have it front and center. Facts be damned.
I just don't think any stories shedding light on dem corruption are allowed to get any traction. The media literally will not follow the story.BMX Bandit said:Quote:
Matt Taibbi explains that the profession of journalism has morphed in a few short years from digging to uncover evidence and report the story to looking the other way for fear of being fired for it.
But explains why legacy media and the cnn and foxnews types didn't run with this story. But why didn't Taibbi?
Tucker Carlson?
Matt Walsh?
Why isn't Cruz sounding the bell on this? Hawley? Comer? Jordan?
Sometimes stories are just made up. We've seen in 100s of times. Though interestingly if it was alleged FoxNews was giving Trump the questions for a debate, every legacy media outlet would have it front and center. Facts be damned.
You don't think Carlson & Walsh are willing to shed light on Dem corruption?
They'd be all over this if it had credibility
They'd be all over this if it had credibility
Yeah…sure…OK…Quote:
I just don't think any stories shedding light on dem corruption are allowed to get any traction. The media literally will not follow the story.
They're also not talking about Trump being shot on live TV that much anymore. Must've been fake too.
Let's just get a sense of the room here.
If you think this didn't happen then copy and paste the following:
"I actually believe that Kamala was not given any form of help that violated the rules or spirit of a fair debate from the hosting network"
Let's see who is willing to actually go on record
*crickets chirping*
If you think this didn't happen then copy and paste the following:
"I actually believe that Kamala was not given any form of help that violated the rules or spirit of a fair debate from the hosting network"
Let's see who is willing to actually go on record
*crickets chirping*
It wouid not surprise me one bit if ABC broke the rules to help Kamala.
One can understand that ABC and other MSM works hand in hand with Kamala and other democrats yet still have the sense to see this "whistleblower" story was a fraud.
One can understand that ABC and other MSM works hand in hand with Kamala and other democrats yet still have the sense to see this "whistleblower" story was a fraud.
BMX Bandit said:Quote:
Matt Taibbi explains that the profession of journalism has morphed in a few short years from digging to uncover evidence and report the story to looking the other way for fear of being fired for it.
That explains why legacy media and the cnn and foxnews types didn't run with this story. But why didn't Taibbi?
Tucker Carlson?
Matt Walsh?
Why isn't Cruz sounding the bell on this? Hawley? Comer? Jordan?
Sometimes stories are just made up. We've seen in 100s of times. Though interestingly if it was alleged FoxNews was giving Trump the questions for a debate, every legacy media outlet would have it front and center. Facts be damned.
Facts be ignored. It took over two years and after a Special Counsel sham investigation before the Russia hoax details were fully debunked in every detail. It took 15 months before the media acknowledged that Hunter Biden's laptop was acknowledged as legitimate and unaltered. Ashley Biden's diary was actually her diary and in her handwriting but it was never acknowledged as such despite the woman who found it abandoned at a halfway house being charged and prosecuted for theft.
There is no justice in out courts and there is no truth in our press when it comes to Democrat political scandals. As I said in my post, the ABC debate fraud will be substantiated but not until after everything at stake in the political race has been decided. When it is decided, no one will be prosecuted and no one will be fired. It is "anarcho tyranny" where the legal system is used to punish those who expose the truth rather than those who commit crimes. Just ask Aimee Harris.
Quote:
It took over two years and after a Special Counsel sham investigation before the Russia hoax details were fully debunked in every detail. It took 15 months before the media acknowledged that Hunter Biden's laptop was acknowledged as legitimate and unaltered.
And conservative media was all over those stores until the facts came out. They were relentless. Thanks for helping make the point!
Crickets still chirping
Still waiting for a Concerned Moderate to copy paste their belief that everything was above board and Kamala wasn't given unfair help
Still waiting for a Concerned Moderate to copy paste their belief that everything was above board and Kamala wasn't given unfair help
Quote:
Since the allegations became public, we have been trying to verify this claim and can now report that we have been informed by a person with knowledge that the Speaker's office did NOT receive any such letter. The whistleblower has not surfaced, nor have his alleged audio tapes been published. The X account posting the whistleblower's claims reported that complaints had been filed with the FEC and SEC, who declined to comment when we attempted to verify these submissions.
I don’t know whether the stuff being peddled by a certain X account re: Tim Walz has even a scintilla of truth behind it. I see the many obvious red flags.
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) October 14, 2024
What I can report is that a month ago this same account claimed he had an ABC whistleblower (1) alleging serious ethical…
I'm Gipper
Sounds concerning.
Based on past Dem behavior, I thought there was a real chance it was real. Alas, it was made up.
Kudos to those on the thread that saw through it.
I'm Gipper
Kudos to those on the thread that saw through it.
I'm Gipper
Nick Sortor commented that this guy was a fraud. Looks like this and some Tim Walz stuff were made up.
Yet now people will believe this stuff because "they read it somewhere" and it fits their worldview. (And before the whataboutisms start, dems do it all the time too.)
Megyn Kelly hates Trump. She is covering up the filed affidavit. Something something time travel, perjury.
Stillllll waiting for a very Concerned Moderate to go on record and tell us that Kamala definitely received no unethical help from the hosting network
Soooooooo weird how no CM us willing to go on record and say this
Soooooooo weird how no CM us willing to go on record and say this
They will post right after people admit they were duped by something with more red flags than a Chinese restaurant next to an animal
Shelter.
Shelter.
Looks like a conservative has trotted out the Dem playbook of make sh*t up and see if it gets legs (pee tape, Russia collusion, etc..)..
Unfortunately, he doesn't have a collusive MSM to help him spread the story…
Unfortunately, he doesn't have a collusive MSM to help him spread the story…
maroonthrunthru said:
Looks like a grifter pretending to be a conservative has trotted out the Dem playbook of make sh*t up and see if it gets legs (pee tape, Russia collusion, etc..)..
Unfortunately, he doesn't have a collusive MSM to help him spread the story…
The issue is most people (rightfully) just have practically zero trust in the media so stuff like this runs for a while even if unproven/sourced.
For the third consecutive year, more U.S. adults have no trust at all in the media (36%) than trust it a great deal or fair amount. pic.twitter.com/Eg1Xy1ZHCa
— Gallup (@Gallup) October 14, 2024
Interesting how all three basically align in 2024, hovering around 33%. Although you could read it as 31% trust it a great deal (remainder of the olds?) and 69% who have little to no trust in MSM.nortex97 said:
The issue is most people (rightfully) just have practically zero trust in the media so stuff like this runs for a while even if unproven/sourced.For the third consecutive year, more U.S. adults have no trust at all in the media (36%) than trust it a great deal or fair amount. pic.twitter.com/Eg1Xy1ZHCa
— Gallup (@Gallup) October 14, 2024
BMX Bandit said:
They will post right after people admit they were duped by something with more red flags than a Chinese restaurant next to an animal
Shelter.
So just to be clear on your position: You fully admit there was collusion and cheating between Kamala and the host network but you're upset because you think someone is lying about knowing what we already know?
Prosperdick said:Either it was always BS or dude got a bag to STFU.Im Gipper said:
Well this fizzled out.
Plata o plomo
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Maroon Dawn said:BMX Bandit said:
They will post right after people admit they were duped by something with more red flags than a Chinese restaurant next to an animal
Shelter.
So just to be clear on your position: You fully admit there was collusion and cheating between Kamala and the host network but you're upset because you think someone is lying about knowing what we already know?
Try reading the thread.
Featured Stories
See All
SEC Round-Up: Dawgs facing possible playoff elimination this week
by Olin Buchanan
33:59
9h ago
1.0k
Pick 'Em & Rip 'Em sponsored by PrizePicks: Week 12
by Matthew Dawson
14:58
9h ago
994
Assessing Earley's first signing class at the helm of Texas A&M baseball
by Ryan Brauninger
Tom Kazansky 2012
Number of football tickets A&M provided to t.u.
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
2
LosAngelesAg00
Instead of scheduling tough non-conference games like ND...
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
2
ElkoSZN
Instead of scheduling tough non-conference games like ND...
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
2